Re: Default implementation of IChainingModel
Hi,
Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
I don't think one was ever created and it fell off my radar. If you create
one, can you post yours and post a link to it back on this thread?
Here is my implementation for Wicket 1.4 (with generics). It is a
little bit different than Scott's one.
import org.apache.wicket.model.IChainingModel;
import org.apache.wicket.model.IDetachable;
import org.apache.wicket.model.IModel;
/**
* Basic implementation of {...@link IChainingModel} interface.
*
* @author Daniel Stoch
*
*/
public class ChainingModelT implements IChainingModelT {
/** Any model object (which may or may not implement IModel) */
private Object target;
public ChainingModel(final Object modelObject) {
target = modelObject;
}
@Override
public IModel? getChainedModel() {
if (target instanceof IModel?) {
return (IModel?)target;
}
return null;
}
@Override
public void setChainedModel(IModel? model) {
target = model;
}
@SuppressWarnings(unchecked)
public T getObject() {
if (target instanceof IModel) {
return ((IModelT)target).getObject();
}
return (T)target;
}
@SuppressWarnings(unchecked)
public void setObject(T object) {
if (target instanceof IModel) {
((IModelT)target).setObject(object);
} else {
target = object;
}
}
public void detach() {
// Detach nested object if it's a detachable
if (target instanceof IDetachable) {
((IDetachable)target).detach();
}
}
@Override
public String toString() {
StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer(Model:classname=[);
sb.append(getClass().getName()).append(]);
sb.append(:nestedModel=[).append(target).append(]);
return sb.toString();
}
@Override
public int hashCode() {
final int prime = 31;
int result = 1;
result = prime * result + ((target == null) ? 0 : target.hashCode());
return result;
}
@Override
public boolean equals(Object obj) {
if (this == obj) return true;
if (obj == null) return false;
if (getClass() != obj.getClass()) return false;
ChainingModel? other = (ChainingModel?)obj;
if (target == null) {
if (other.target != null) return false;
} else if (!target.equals(other.target)) return false;
return true;
}
}
--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Default implementation of IChainingModel
I searched the JIRA for IChainingModel and didn't get any hits. Did
anyone create a JIRA issue? Here's an implementation of mine.
public class BaseChainingModel implements IChainingModel {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
private Object target;
public BaseChainingModel(Object modelObject) {
if (modelObject == null) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(Parameter
modelObject cannot be null);
}
else {
target = modelObject;
}
}
@Override
public void detach() {
if (target instanceof IDetachable)
((IDetachable) target).detach();
}
@Override
public IModel getChainedModel() {
if (target instanceof IModel)
return (IModel) target;
else
return null;
}
@Override
public void setChainedModel(IModel model) {
target = model;
}
@Override
public Object getObject() {
Object object = target;
while (object instanceof IModel) {
Object tmp = ((IModel) object).getObject();
if (tmp == object) {
break; // pathological
}
object = tmp;
}
return object;
}
@Override
public void setObject(Object obj) {
if (target instanceof IModel)
((IModel) target).setObject(obj);
else if (obj == null || obj instanceof Serializable)
target = obj;
else
throw new WicketRuntimeException(Model object must be
Serializable);
}
}
Scott
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
I think that's a good idea - I have done a similar thing in my own
projects. Please open a JIRA so this idea doesn't get lost, but this is one
I may try to do soon.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Juan G. Arias juangar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,First of all, I'm using wicket 1.3.5
I'm writing a model and ai need it to be chaineable. I mean, I need this
model to contain another model, so my model can obtain the data, for
example, from a property model.
Ok, I've been reading and this is solved by the IChainingModel.
But I couldn't find any default implementation of this interface.
There are two classes currently implementing this interface,
AbstractPropertyModel and CompoundPropertyModel.
Both classes has some code duplicated, specifically:
- void detach()
- IModel getChainedModel()
- void setChainedModel(IModel model)
- some lines of void setObject(Object object)
- the code in CompuntPropertyModel#getObject() and
AbstarctPropertyModel#getTarget() is different, but the logic is the same.
And I'm afraid my code will be the same as those classes.
So, finally, my point.
Is there any default implementation of this behavior? Is there a chance to
add a super-class with this code?
Thanks!
Juan Arias
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Default implementation of IChainingModel
I don't think one was ever created and it fell off my radar. If you create
one, can you post yours and post a link to it back on this thread?
Thanks!
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Scott Swank scott.sw...@gmail.com wrote:
I searched the JIRA for IChainingModel and didn't get any hits. Did
anyone create a JIRA issue? Here's an implementation of mine.
public class BaseChainingModel implements IChainingModel {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
private Object target;
public BaseChainingModel(Object modelObject) {
if (modelObject == null) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(Parameter
modelObject cannot be null);
}
else {
target = modelObject;
}
}
@Override
public void detach() {
if (target instanceof IDetachable)
((IDetachable) target).detach();
}
@Override
public IModel getChainedModel() {
if (target instanceof IModel)
return (IModel) target;
else
return null;
}
@Override
public void setChainedModel(IModel model) {
target = model;
}
@Override
public Object getObject() {
Object object = target;
while (object instanceof IModel) {
Object tmp = ((IModel) object).getObject();
if (tmp == object) {
break; // pathological
}
object = tmp;
}
return object;
}
@Override
public void setObject(Object obj) {
if (target instanceof IModel)
((IModel) target).setObject(obj);
else if (obj == null || obj instanceof Serializable)
target = obj;
else
throw new WicketRuntimeException(Model object must
be Serializable);
}
}
Scott
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
I think that's a good idea - I have done a similar thing in my own
projects. Please open a JIRA so this idea doesn't get lost, but this is
one
I may try to do soon.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Juan G. Arias juangar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,First of all, I'm using wicket 1.3.5
I'm writing a model and ai need it to be chaineable. I mean, I need
this
model to contain another model, so my model can obtain the data, for
example, from a property model.
Ok, I've been reading and this is solved by the IChainingModel.
But I couldn't find any default implementation of this interface.
There are two classes currently implementing this interface,
AbstractPropertyModel and CompoundPropertyModel.
Both classes has some code duplicated, specifically:
- void detach()
- IModel getChainedModel()
- void setChainedModel(IModel model)
- some lines of void setObject(Object object)
- the code in CompuntPropertyModel#getObject() and
AbstarctPropertyModel#getTarget() is different, but the logic is the
same.
And I'm afraid my code will be the same as those classes.
So, finally, my point.
Is there any default implementation of this behavior? Is there a chance
to
add a super-class with this code?
Thanks!
Juan Arias
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Default implementation of IChainingModel
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2498
We're still on Wicket 1.3.5, so I put in a 1 hour estimate for someone
to add generic typing.
Scott
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
I don't think one was ever created and it fell off my radar. If you create
one, can you post yours and post a link to it back on this thread?
Thanks!
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Scott Swank scott.sw...@gmail.com wrote:
I searched the JIRA for IChainingModel and didn't get any hits. Did
anyone create a JIRA issue? Here's an implementation of mine.
public class BaseChainingModel implements IChainingModel {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
private Object target;
public BaseChainingModel(Object modelObject) {
if (modelObject == null) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(Parameter
modelObject cannot be null);
}
else {
target = modelObject;
}
}
�...@override
public void detach() {
if (target instanceof IDetachable)
((IDetachable) target).detach();
}
�...@override
public IModel getChainedModel() {
if (target instanceof IModel)
return (IModel) target;
else
return null;
}
�...@override
public void setChainedModel(IModel model) {
target = model;
}
�...@override
public Object getObject() {
Object object = target;
while (object instanceof IModel) {
Object tmp = ((IModel) object).getObject();
if (tmp == object) {
break; // pathological
}
object = tmp;
}
return object;
}
�...@override
public void setObject(Object obj) {
if (target instanceof IModel)
((IModel) target).setObject(obj);
else if (obj == null || obj instanceof Serializable)
target = obj;
else
throw new WicketRuntimeException(Model object must
be Serializable);
}
}
Scott
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
I think that's a good idea - I have done a similar thing in my own
projects. Please open a JIRA so this idea doesn't get lost, but this is
one
I may try to do soon.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Juan G. Arias juangar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,First of all, I'm using wicket 1.3.5
I'm writing a model and ai need it to be chaineable. I mean, I need
this
model to contain another model, so my model can obtain the data, for
example, from a property model.
Ok, I've been reading and this is solved by the IChainingModel.
But I couldn't find any default implementation of this interface.
There are two classes currently implementing this interface,
AbstractPropertyModel and CompoundPropertyModel.
Both classes has some code duplicated, specifically:
- void detach()
- IModel getChainedModel()
- void setChainedModel(IModel model)
- some lines of void setObject(Object object)
- the code in CompuntPropertyModel#getObject() and
AbstarctPropertyModel#getTarget() is different, but the logic is the
same.
And I'm afraid my code will be the same as those classes.
So, finally, my point.
Is there any default implementation of this behavior? Is there a chance
to
add a super-class with this code?
Thanks!
Juan Arias
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Default implementation of IChainingModel
Hi all,First of all, I'm using wicket 1.3.5 I'm writing a model and ai need it to be chaineable. I mean, I need this model to contain another model, so my model can obtain the data, for example, from a property model. Ok, I've been reading and this is solved by the IChainingModel. But I couldn't find any default implementation of this interface. There are two classes currently implementing this interface, AbstractPropertyModel and CompoundPropertyModel. Both classes has some code duplicated, specifically: - void detach() - IModel getChainedModel() - void setChainedModel(IModel model) - some lines of void setObject(Object object) - the code in CompuntPropertyModel#getObject() and AbstarctPropertyModel#getTarget() is different, but the logic is the same. And I'm afraid my code will be the same as those classes. So, finally, my point. Is there any default implementation of this behavior? Is there a chance to add a super-class with this code? Thanks! Juan Arias
Re: Default implementation of IChainingModel
I think that's a good idea - I have done a similar thing in my own projects. Please open a JIRA so this idea doesn't get lost, but this is one I may try to do soon. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Juan G. Arias juangar...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all,First of all, I'm using wicket 1.3.5 I'm writing a model and ai need it to be chaineable. I mean, I need this model to contain another model, so my model can obtain the data, for example, from a property model. Ok, I've been reading and this is solved by the IChainingModel. But I couldn't find any default implementation of this interface. There are two classes currently implementing this interface, AbstractPropertyModel and CompoundPropertyModel. Both classes has some code duplicated, specifically: - void detach() - IModel getChainedModel() - void setChainedModel(IModel model) - some lines of void setObject(Object object) - the code in CompuntPropertyModel#getObject() and AbstarctPropertyModel#getTarget() is different, but the logic is the same. And I'm afraid my code will be the same as those classes. So, finally, my point. Is there any default implementation of this behavior? Is there a chance to add a super-class with this code? Thanks! Juan Arias
