Hi,
I have lots of RingoJS modules that can be accessed via a url in a browser.
I have decided to use RingoJS for building simple modules that I will like
to include in wicket application as Page web parts - especially for
features I need to be completely written in Javascript.
If there's anyone
Hi,
Isn't that very slow ?
Rhino is not the fastest script engine.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Kayode Odeyemi drey...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have lots of RingoJS modules that can be accessed via a url in a browser.
I have decided to use RingoJS for building simple modules that I will
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.orgwrote:
Hi,
Isn't that very slow ?
Rhino is not the fastest script engine.
I didn't compare rhino to the likes of node.js, rubyracer etc when I
started trying it out. My decision was based on use case and the fact that
it
