Re: Junit required for WicketTester?

2008-03-13 Thread Timo Rantalaiho
On Fri, 07 Mar 2008, reikje wrote:
> Do you have to have junit.jar in the classpath if you want to use
> WicketTester? We are using TestNG here and in a regular TestNG test case

Supposedly BaseWicketTester is testing framework neutral,
and WicketTester the JUnit version of it. Theoretically you
might be able to do TestNgWicketTester by extending 
BaseWicketTester, but I don't know if it would work in practice.

Best wishes,
Timo

-- 
Timo Rantalaiho   
Reaktor Innovations Oyhttp://www.ri.fi/ >

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Junit required for WicketTester?

2008-03-09 Thread James Carman
On 3/9/08, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In 1.3 WicketTester is the Junit implementation of BaseWicketTester.
>
I don't think that will pose any problems.  TestNG (and Maven
Surefire) is supposed to be able to run JUnit-based tests (using JUnit
asserts) just fine.  As long as your test classes have the @Test
annotations, you should be ok.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Junit required for WicketTester?

2008-03-09 Thread Frank Bille
In 1.3 WicketTester is the Junit implementation of BaseWicketTester.
Frank

On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 3:33 PM, reikje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> Do you have to have junit.jar in the classpath if you want to use
> WicketTester? We are using TestNG here and in a regular TestNG test case
> (where the class is annotated with @Test), I get
> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: junit/framework/AssertionFailedError.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Junit-required-for-WicketTester--tp15892202p15892202.html
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


Re: Junit required for WicketTester?

2008-03-07 Thread Igor Vaynberg
i think tester uses junit's asserts, so yes.

-igor


On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 6:33 AM, reikje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  Do you have to have junit.jar in the classpath if you want to use
>  WicketTester? We are using TestNG here and in a regular TestNG test case
>  (where the class is annotated with @Test), I get
>  java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: junit/framework/AssertionFailedError.
>  --
>  View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/Junit-required-for-WicketTester--tp15892202p15892202.html
>  Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>  -
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Junit required for WicketTester?

2008-03-07 Thread reikje

Do you have to have junit.jar in the classpath if you want to use
WicketTester? We are using TestNG here and in a regular TestNG test case
(where the class is annotated with @Test), I get
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: junit/framework/AssertionFailedError.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Junit-required-for-WicketTester--tp15892202p15892202.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]