Re: Our new and shiny Wicket site!

2008-03-04 Thread Jonathan Locke
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Our-new-and-shiny-Wicket-site%21-tp15710279p15835447.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail

Our new and shiny Wicket site!

2008-02-27 Thread Daniel Frisk
After a couple of months coding we have released our Wicket website! It has generally been a pleasure porting our jsp site and we have been able to add a lot of functionality as well. Check it out at http://jalbum.net // Daniel

Re: Our new and shiny Wicket site!

2008-02-27 Thread C.
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 11:22 +0100, Daniel Frisk wrote: After a couple of months coding we have released our Wicket website! It has generally been a pleasure porting our jsp site and we have been able to add a lot of functionality as well. Check it out at http://jalbum.net I think this sort

Re: Our new and shiny Wicket site!

2008-02-27 Thread Matej Knopp
I don't think there is anything wrong with posting emails about new wicket based sites. Not everyone has the time to be checking wiki pages constantly. -Matej On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 11:30 AM, C. Bergström [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 11:22 +0100, Daniel Frisk wrote:

Re: Our new and shiny Wicket site!

2008-02-27 Thread Nick Heudecker
+1 On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think there is anything wrong with posting emails about new wicket based sites. Not everyone has the time to be checking wiki pages constantly. -Matej On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 11:30 AM, C. Bergström [EMAIL

Re: Our new and shiny Wicket site!

2008-02-27 Thread Daniel Frisk
Thanks! We wrote our own grid for linking to the photo albums, and the actual albums are generated by our desktop client. The whole concept is a bit different than Flickr and it's not a one size fits all solution. // Daniel On 2008-02-28, at 02:41, Scott Swank wrote: Daniel, Nice

Re: Our new and shiny Wicket site!

2008-02-27 Thread Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
+1, it also kind of opens up allowing for questions to the site announced... regards Nino Matej Knopp wrote: I don't think there is anything wrong with posting emails about new wicket based sites. Not everyone has the time to be checking wiki pages constantly. -Matej On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at

Re: Our new and shiny Wicket site!

2008-02-27 Thread Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
Hi Daniel Looks nice, is a touch of ajax on its way(I think it kinds of makes the flow go a bit easyer) ? I noticed that your web container arent either picking up cookies thats why the jsession id are appended: http://jalbum.net/tour;jsessionid=B45F87100AAA623164CE4934FCB884B6 Theres a

Re: Our new and shiny Wicket site!

2008-02-27 Thread Fabrizio Giudici
+1, especially if the site is really shiny, you can understand things that can be done with the framework and have some inspiration. On 28/feb/08, at 08:19, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote: +1, it also kind of opens up allowing for questions to the site announced... regards

Re: Our new and shiny Wicket site!

2008-02-27 Thread Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
BTW have been thinking of doing a fade in fade out thing for ajax requests.. But hey maybe you could already do that with the scriptaculus contrib.. Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote: Hi Daniel Looks nice, is a touch of ajax on its way(I think it kinds of makes the flow go a bit

Re: Our new and shiny Wicket site!

2008-02-27 Thread Daniel Frisk
We are definately going with more ajax and stuff! But first things first so we need to get it running super smooth and then we'll add the bling :-) // Daniel On 2008-02-28, at 08:23, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote: Hi Daniel Looks nice, is a touch of ajax on its way(I think

Re: Our new and shiny Wicket site!

2008-02-27 Thread Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
True:) One told me once that if you try to capture all the stars on the sky then you will fail, try to capture one and you might succeed. - I'll go for capturing one and then expand:) Daniel Frisk wrote: We are definately going with more ajax and stuff! But first things first so we need to