in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-Wicket-and-generics-tp2341004p2341500.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr
Betreff: Re: Question about Wicket and generics
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> i have written plenty forms and about 99% of them have Form.
> models on the form are just not that useful, its the fields that
> care.
That doesn't mean that's the way *
model? How are others doing this?
Mike
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-Wicket-and-generics-tp2341004p2341288.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> i have written plenty forms and about 99% of them have Form.
> models on the form are just not that useful, its the fields that
> care.
That doesn't mean that's the way *everyone* uses them. Then again, my
way isn't necessarily the way ev
just offering the other side of the coin...i didnt say we were going
to yank the generics from the Form, chill :)
-igor
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:38 AM, James Carman
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Igor Vaynberg
> wrote:
>> i have written plenty forms and about 99% of them have Form
i have written plenty forms and about 99% of them have Form.
models on the form are just not that useful, its the fields that
care.
-igor
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 5:45 AM, James Carman
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Mike Dee wrote:
>>
>> Also noticed in prior messages with similar to
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Mike Dee wrote:
>
> In my experience, there are lots of other situations too. For example, we
> have lots of forms for doing searches. The form gathers the search
> criteria. Maybe it would make sense to have a SearchFormCriteria class,
> which would be the mod
Great, didn't know there was a built in LoginForm.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-Wicket-and-generics-tp2341004p2341060.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabbl
e a login screen that
> simply capture username and password strings.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-Wicket-and-generics-tp2341004p2341026.html
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing li
-Wicket-and-generics-tp2341004p2341026.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Mike Dee wrote:
>
> Also noticed in prior messages with similar topic that someone suggested
> using "Void" (Form). Never knew there was a Void keyword (capital V).
> Is this a recommended technique for Form (ie. Form)?
It's certainly possible. Remember that th
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Mike Dee wrote:
>
> I'd like to try and understand this. What could possibly be?
>
It would be whatever your form is "editing."
> But isn't "TextField" implying text (or a string). Would TextField
> make sense (haven't tried it yet)? If it makes sense, then m
tion-about-Wicket-and-generics-tp2341004p2341007.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
hot either.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-Wicket-and-generics-tp2341004p2341004.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe
14 matches
Mail list logo
