Re: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-08 Thread James Carman
of N <= 1. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >Jeremy Thomerson >>>>>>> >-- sent from my smartphone - please excuse formatting and spelling >>>>>>> errors >>>>>>> > >

Re: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-08 Thread Igor Vaynberg
and spelling >>>>>> errors >>>>>> > >>>>>> >On Jul 5, 2010 12:41 AM, "Arjun Dhar" wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> >Hi, >>>>>> > all the e

Re: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-08 Thread James Carman
;> but I >>>>> >cant >>>>> >break it up. The break up is essential when you want to merge common >>>>> parts >>>>> >of your MARKUP with multiple specific parts of the Child page. >>&

Re: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-08 Thread Ben Tilford
gt;> >Example: > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> >BASE TEMPLATE / PARENT PAGE > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > Some other Html common

Re: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-08 Thread Igor Vaynberg
> >>>> >Example: >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >BASE TEMPLATE / PARENT PAGE >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >       >>>> >       >>

Re: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-08 Thread James Carman
gt;       >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >----------- >>> > >>> > >>> >CHILD PAGE 1 >>> > >>> > >>> >       >>> >                   P

RE: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-08 Thread Chris Colman
Part 1 specific to Child Page >> > >> > Any HTML here can be ignored as conceptually anyway what appears >> in >> > is what should be rendered from a child page. >> > >> > Part 2 Specific to Child Page (will

Re: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-08 Thread Ben Tilford
t; Any HTML here can be ignored as conceptually anyway what appears > in > > is what should be rendered from a child page. > > > > Part 2 Specific to Child Page (will appear after > common > >HTML in parent page) > > > > > >

RE: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-08 Thread Chris Colman
Child Page (will appear after common >HTML in parent page) > > > > > >I tried this, only the first part renders. I'm wondering if we can add such >capability. Conceptually I don't see why not. If already possible do let me >know or consider as a feature reques

RE: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-08 Thread Chris Colman
s supported natively in Wicket. >-----Original Message----- >From: Arjun Dhar [mailto:dhar...@yahoo.com] >Sent: Monday, 5 July 2010 3:40 PM >To: users@wicket.apache.org >Subject: Single inheritence in parts > > >Hi, > all the examples etc suggest that Single inherit

Re: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-07 Thread Erik van Oosten
Indeed, multiple inheritance is not the correct term in this case. The point is that the parent class' markup may contain multiple places to place components from sub-classes. Regards, Erik. Op 06-07-10 18:03, Arjun Dhar wrote: On a last note; ..am confusedmultiple inheritance gen

Re: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-07 Thread Erik van Oosten
I must have been listening to the wrong people then. Sorry to continue any false hopes. Too bad; there is only a small sweet spot for markup inheritance, but with this extension it would be very sweet indeed. Thanks for the link Jeremy. Regards, Erik. On 06-07-10 22:08, Jeremy Thomerso

Re: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-06 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 4:38 AM, Erik van Oosten wrote: > Yes, this has been promised many times. And I am looking forward to it :) > > Regards, >Erik. > > > > Op 06-07-10 07:53, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote: > >> Hi Jeremy, >> >> Wasn't this on the which list for 1.5? [1] and [2]? >> >> Che

Re: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-06 Thread Arjun Dhar
parents). Here there is only ONE PARENT MARKUP required and ONE CHILD markup. Maybe my perspective is not right. I'll search more material on this and educate myself. thanks a lot -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Single-inheritence-in-

Re: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-06 Thread Erik van Oosten
Yes, this has been promised many times. And I am looking forward to it :) Regards, Erik. Op 06-07-10 07:53, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote: Hi Jeremy, Wasn't this on the which list for 1.5? [1] and [2]? Cheers, Ernesto 1-https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wicket-15-wish-list.html#Wicket1

Re: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-05 Thread Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
ould be rendered from a child page. >>       >>                   Part 2 Specific to Child Page (will appear after common >> HTML in parent page) >>       >> >> >> >> >> I tried this, only the first part render

Re: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-05 Thread Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
ific to Child Page (will appear after common > HTML in parent page) >       > > > > > I tried this, only the first part renders. I'm wondering if we can add such > capability. Conceptually I don't see why not. If already possible do let me > know or consider

Re: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-05 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
not. If already possible do let me know or consider as a feature request?! -Thanks Arjun -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Single-inheritence-in-parts-tp2278064p2278064.html Sent from the Wicket - User

Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-04 Thread Arjun Dhar
! -Thanks Arjun -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Single-inheritence-in-parts-tp2278064p2278064.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-m