td2031552.html
>
> Jeremy
>
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Marek Šabo wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to know what's the status of wicket-security. I've been
> > using it for couple of months but only for simple tasks. I would like to
> > di
See the second message at this link (the one from Martijn):
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-1-4-upgrade-dependent-on-Wicket-Security-1-4-td2031552.html
Jeremy
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Marek Šabo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know what's the st
Hi,
I would like to know what's the status of wicket-security. I've been
using it for couple of months but only for simple tasks. I would like to
dig deeper but there is like on getting started and few mailing list
entries.
Is there someone who works on the project or is it fading? If s
Hmm yeah, I might see if I can get some time to look into it... However
I think Wayne pope Also mentioned that he would do something with it,
have heard nothing though my stack are a bit full at the moment..
http://www.nabble.com/WASP-SWARM-status-tt20318330.html#a20318997
Jeremy Thomerson w
Martijn,
Looking in the maven repo, it looks like there is also a version
1.4-SNAPSHOT of wicket-security. It has a build date of Nov 2008.
http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/apache/wicket/wicket-security/swarm/1.4-SNAPSHOT
It looks like the following might be the source. But these comm
Martijn,
I'm in the planning and estimating stages for this project, so no I
haven't tried it out. I was hoping to hear from someone who has to
help give me an idea of how much effort will be involved. Of course,
I will be giving it a try as well, I just haven't yet.
Thanks!
Tauren
On Fri, Fe
Brill,
At the moment, I just don't know. But I will certainly take your
comment to heart. I do have the feeling that this app will need more
than wicket-auth-roles can provide.
Thanks,
Tauren
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Brill Pappin wrote:
> Every time I think I want to move up from wic
Our company is quite invested in swarm/wasp (Maurice was a friend and
co-worker). Our current projects are still 1.3 based, and several
swarm/wasp based projects will move to wicket 1.4 as it becomes final.
Chances are we'll need to fix swarm/wasp as well, and invest into that
when that happens.
W
Every time I think I want to move up from wicket-auth-roles, I realize
that its YAGNI and never do.
that said, that are times when auth-roles is a pain, but thats always
because its written so its not easily extendable.
My advice would be "do you actually need such fine grained control
over
Jeremy,
Thanks for the response. I apologize for touching on a sensitive
subject like this, but I was unaware of the circumstances. My
condolences to anyone who knew Maurice.
It really does look like Wicket-security, and in particular version
1.3.1 might be the right solution for my application
I think since Maurice's death, there has not been much concrete discussion
as to the future of it. I suppose it needs a leader to pick it up and run
with it (and I nominate Nino :)
http://www.nabble.com/Future-of-Wicket-Security--td19176506.html
http://www.nabble.com/In-memoriam:-Maurice-Marrink-
Does anyone know the current status of the wicket-security project?
It looks like there has been no activity in svn for close to a year.
And it is unclear if it will work with wicket 1.4. What is the
preferred tool today for implementing a roles-based authorization and
authentication system with w
12 matches
Mail list logo
