Re: Testing wicket 1.3
ahh, yeah this are more flexible:) regards Nino Frank Bille wrote: One thing you also could consider is using the TagTester. Currently you can find a tag by using the getTagById and getTagByWicketId. My orignial plan was to have several helper methods for finding the html tags you want for testing. http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13doc/org/apache/wicket/util/tester/TagTester.html Frank On 9/19/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Kent hmm, while this could be okay. I just fear the possibility that tests may succeed if other components contains foo. This test does not take hierarchy into account.. For the simple Bbcodecomponent, it will work as I will be testing it isolated. However if others that are using the component wants to test that the out come are correct, this could be a potential pitfall. regards Nino Kent Tong wrote: Nino.Martinez wrote: I was wondering how I should be testing with wicket. I've created the bbcodecomponent, I have a bbcodeLabel. And I would like to write a test for that. I can see that I can't use the assertLabel as that just gets modelObjectToString, in the bbcodeLabel some formatting are done during onComponentTagBody. Is this completely wrong, how should testing be done? I can see that the dateLabel uses an approach with converters, although im not sure how this are done. But are this more propper? try something like: WicketTester tester = new WicketTester(); tester.startPage(Home.class); tester.assertContains(foo); - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Testing wicket 1.3
Hi Kent hmm, while this could be okay. I just fear the possibility that tests may succeed if other components contains foo. This test does not take hierarchy into account.. For the simple Bbcodecomponent, it will work as I will be testing it isolated. However if others that are using the component wants to test that the out come are correct, this could be a potential pitfall. regards Nino Kent Tong wrote: Nino.Martinez wrote: I was wondering how I should be testing with wicket. I've created the bbcodecomponent, I have a bbcodeLabel. And I would like to write a test for that. I can see that I can't use the assertLabel as that just gets modelObjectToString, in the bbcodeLabel some formatting are done during onComponentTagBody. Is this completely wrong, how should testing be done? I can see that the dateLabel uses an approach with converters, although im not sure how this are done. But are this more propper? try something like: WicketTester tester = new WicketTester(); tester.startPage(Home.class); tester.assertContains(foo); - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Testing wicket 1.3
Nino.Martinez wrote: I was wondering how I should be testing with wicket. I've created the bbcodecomponent, I have a bbcodeLabel. And I would like to write a test for that. I can see that I can't use the assertLabel as that just gets modelObjectToString, in the bbcodeLabel some formatting are done during onComponentTagBody. Is this completely wrong, how should testing be done? I can see that the dateLabel uses an approach with converters, although im not sure how this are done. But are this more propper? try something like: WicketTester tester = new WicketTester(); tester.startPage(Home.class); tester.assertContains(foo); -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Testing-wicket-1.3-tf4469190.html#a12758401 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Testing wicket 1.3
Hi I was wondering how I should be testing with wicket. I've created the bbcodecomponent, I have a bbcodeLabel. And I would like to write a test for that. I can see that I can't use the assertLabel as that just gets modelObjectToString, in the bbcodeLabel some formatting are done during onComponentTagBody. Is this completely wrong, how should testing be done? I can see that the dateLabel uses an approach with converters, although im not sure how this are done. But are this more propper? regards Nino - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
