Hello,
Could you post some pseudo-code on what your request mapper looks like? I
have a similar use-case but I wasn't able to follow. I created a
MyRequestMapper class that wraps the default root mapper:
setRootRequestMapper(new MyRequestMapper(getRootRequestMapper()));
public
Try creating a method such as this;
private IRequestHandler renderPage(Class? extends IRequestablePage
pageClass, PageParameters pageParameters) {
PageProvider pageProvider = new PageProvider(pageClass,
pageParameters);
Thx!
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 14:11:56 +0300, Alexandros Karypidis
akary...@yahoo.gr wrote:
Hello,
Could you post some pseudo-code on what your request mapper looks like?
I have a similar use-case but I wasn't able to follow. I created a
MyRequestMapper class that wraps the default root
Hi,
I'm really keen to have a clearer understanding of the page mapping changes
in Wicket 1.5 - right now it is still not totally clear in my mind.
The best way to explain is by highlighting some requirements I have based on
the URL scheme we are trying to achieve in a project.
We have the
Hi,
Create a new IRequestMapper and set it as root mapper - see the
examples for HttpsMapper and CryptoMapper to see how.
This new mapper will process the URL and decide which page to use
(CategoryPage vs. LocationPage) and use BookmarkablePageRequestHandler
to render it.
The new mapper should
Hey Martin.
Thanks for the awesome reply speed!
It is amazing how committed you guys are to solving the real world problems
we face as developers. Wicket is such a cool framework and it's great to see
these new features constantly evolving to add the sort of flexibility needed
when there's an
Martin,
Just playing with the code now - I'm afraid I'm not sure exactly what you
mean by:
The new mapper should be compound (ICompoundRequestMapper) and
fallback to default mappers for Wicket internal works (link/form
listeners, ajax, ...)
Could you elaborate briefly on this piece?
Thanks,
Ignore this.
getRootRequestMapperAsCompound() will convert it for you anyway.
Just follow how Https and Crypto mappers work
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:54 PM, drewzilla80 andrew.eas...@gmail.com wrote:
Martin,
Just playing with the code now - I'm afraid I'm not sure exactly what you
mean by:
Thanks, Martin. That's what I already ended up doing as it turns out (I dug
into the code and noticed the method you specified). I've got my whole
original use case working very nicely indeed - thanks for your help.
dz
--
View this message in context:
