On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 7:18 AM, MattyDE wrote:
> its not the
> wicket-way right?
>
It's *a* wicket way. I'd say it's better than Martin's suggestion of
copy-and-paste code. But, at the end of the day, it's up to your style
preference.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://wickettraining.com
*Need a CM
nately "getConverter" is final in CheckBox so i cant place my
>> own
>> converter there.
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
> Copy CheckBox to MyCheckBox and hack it however you want.
>
>>
>> Thanks :)
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>&g
unfornately "getConverter" is final in CheckBox so i cant place my own
> converter there.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks :)
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Use-Byte-vor-CheckBox-instead-of-Boolean-tp3236065p3236065.html
>
ckBox and hack it however you want.
>
> Thanks :)
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Use-Byte-vor-CheckBox-instead-of-Boolean-tp3236065p3236065.html
> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
Everyone know what i want Byte 0 = False Byte 1 = True.
But unfornately "getConverter" is final in CheckBox so i cant place my own
converter there.
Any ideas?
Thanks :)
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Use-Byte-vor-CheckBox-instead-