[ ] IDataProviderI,T
[ x ] IteratorIModelT , drop model
[ ] Leave as is.
Maarten
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I would have a better idea if I would have had the chance to actually
play with it, but here is mine:
[ ] IDataProviderI,T
[ x ]
%3A-Generics-of-IDataProvider-tp16871723p16957615.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I have a usecase where the current proposed generic Interface for IDataProvider
with upcoming v1.4 of Wicket would break the implementation concept working with
Wicket 1.3. The usecase needs different types for iterator + model. Example and
explanation are found below the vote:
VOTE:
[ ] IDataProviderI,T
[X] IteratorIModelT , drop model
[ ] Leave as is.
Regards,
Sebastiaan
Jan Kriesten wrote:
Hi,
I have a usecase where the current proposed generic Interface for
IDataProvider with upcoming v1.4 of Wicket would break the
implementation concept working with Wicket 1.3.
[ ] IDataProviderI,T
[X] IteratorIModelT , drop model
[X] Leave as is.
I dont care much between those 2.
But i definitely dont like option 1, because your example gives me exact
the feeling why i dont want that
It gives the wrong idea to peoples mind. If they would do what you do,
Integer list
[ ] IDataProviderI,T
[ X ] IteratorIModelT , drop model
[ ] Leave as is.
Thijs
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 4/24/08, Jan Kriesten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ ] IDataProviderI,T
[ ] IteratorIModelT , drop model
[X] Leave as is.
I don't see the additional benefit of removing the model method. It
only breaks API for nothing much gained.
Martijn
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:42 AM, Jan Kriesten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a usecase where the current proposed generic Interface for
IDataProvider with upcoming v1.4 of Wicket would break the implementation
concept working with Wicket 1.3. The usecase needs different types for
VOTE:
[ ] IDataProviderI,T
[ ] IteratorIModelT , drop model
[X] Leave as is.
-Matej
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would have a better idea if I would have had the chance to actually
play with it, but here is mine:
[ ] IDataProviderI,T
[ x ] IteratorIModelT , drop model
[ ] Leave as is.
Looks most elegant to me, and it is immediately clear what T is for.
Also, I think that generics are bloody verbose
10 matches
Mail list logo
