https://repository.apache.org/service/local/repo_groups/snapshots-group/content/org/apache/wicket/wicket-bean-validation/10.0.0-M1-SNAPSHOT/wicket-bean-validation-10.0.0-M1-20221118.110647-167.pom
>
> Both seem to be there.
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 9:35 AM Francesco Chicchiriccò
> wro
-validation/10.0.0-M1-SNAPSHOT/wicket-bean-validation-10.0.0-M1-20221118.110647-167.pom
Both seem to be there.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 9:35 AM Francesco Chicchiriccò
wrote:
> Forgot to add that the same happens with wicket-devutils.
>
> Regards.
>
> On 2023/01/03 07:33:36 Francesco Chi
t seems however, that
>
> org.apache.wicket:wicket-bean-validation:10.0.0-M1-SNAPSHOT
>
> is not available from
>
> https://repository.apache.org/
>
> while the module seems to be regularly present in the source tree at
>
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/tree/master/wicket-bean-validatio
Hi there,
I am working to upgrade our Wicket apps to Spring Boot 3 and found that
10.0.0-M1-SNAPSHOT plays nicely with it.
It seems however, that
org.apache.wicket:wicket-bean-validation:10.0.0-M1-SNAPSHOT
is not available from
https://repository.apache.org/
while the module seems
sto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> reier...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 1:04 PM Maxim Solodovnik
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Zbynek,
> > >
> > > In our project we are customizing validation messages as follows
Yes,
ResourceModel seems to be much better to use in this case
Not the best example :(
On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 at 18:24, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 1:04 PM Maxim Solodovnik
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Zbynek,
> >
> > In our proj
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 1:04 PM Maxim Solodovnik
wrote:
> Hello Zbynek,
>
> In our project we are customizing validation messages as follows:
>
> Markup:
>
>
>
> Java:
> add(new
>
> RequiredTextField("wicketid").setLabel(Model.of(getString(&qu
Hello Zbynek,
In our project we are customizing validation messages as follows:
Markup:
Java:
add(new
RequiredTextField("wicketid").setLabel(Model.of(getString("label_key";
This way lots of built-in validation messages will be "auto-customized"
not sure if
at 11:44 AM Zbynek Vavros
wrote:
> So I am using localized version of validation message for required fields
>
> Required=My custom message for field '${label}'
>
> but the resulting message contains field ID as parameters and result is
> i.e.
>
> "My custom message fo
:
So I am using localized version of validation message for required fields
Required=My custom message for field '${label}'
but the resulting message contains field ID as parameters and result is i.e.
"My custom message for field 'password'"
since the whole page is not in English I
So I am using localized version of validation message for required fields
Required=My custom message for field '${label}'
but the resulting message contains field ID as parameters and result is i.e.
"My custom message for field 'password'"
since the whole page is not in English I
yes ,i find the key. thanks
--
Sent from: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Users-forum-f1842947.html
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
am using setMaxSize() to limit the file upload size.
> Looks like the validation message is default to "Upload must be less than
> "
> Is there any way to customize this validation message ?
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946
Hi ,
i am using setMaxSize() to limit the file upload size.
Looks like the validation message is default to "Upload must be less than "
Is there any way to customize this validation message ?
--
Sent from: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Users-forum-f18
Hi,
your code didn't make it into the mailing list, but I've checked it on
Nabble:
I don't see anything wrong and your example should work as you expect it.
Check your markup for misplaced open/close tags, maybe something is
misinterpreted by Chrome when you update part of the page.
Or
Hello everyone,
I am experiencing some strange behavior in Wicket when attempting to submit
a Form through ajax...
I have a custom panel (*FileUploadPanel* which extends *Panel*) that I
created. It is used to upload files, but it is more robust than a
FileUploadField.
I have also added a
g("CaptchaRequired"));
>
> Regards
> Sven
>
>
> Am 23.08.2017 um 19:18 schrieb Entropy:
>
> > Yeah, it's definitely related to the component that the
> > ComponentFeedbackPanel relates to. If I use a TextField, it finds the
> > message per
extField, it finds the
message perfectly. I change it to a web markup container or hiddenfield,
and it fails to find the message. Same name, same code doing the validation
and the adding of the validation key.
I tried a TextField with visibility set to false and that didn't even show
the error (w
Yeah, it's definitely related to the component that the
ComponentFeedbackPanel relates to. If I use a TextField, it finds the
message perfectly. I change it to a web markup container or hiddenfield,
and it fails to find the message. Same name, same code doing the validation
and the adding
what we do with all of our
> > messages. We fed a WebMarkupContainer (WMC) that is around the CFP in
> as
> > the Component for the CFP to relate to. We add the validation message
> to
> > that WMC, and the error DOES show.
> >
> > However, for some reason it's not finding the
MC) that is around the CFP in as
> the Component for the CFP to relate to. We add the validation message to
> that WMC, and the error DOES show.
>
> However, for some reason it's not finding the validation key from the
> property file. Every other error done the same way DOES, so i ha
in as
the Component for the CFP to relate to. We add the validation message to
that WMC, and the error DOES show.
However, for some reason it's not finding the validation key from the
property file. Every other error done the same way DOES, so i have to guess
that it's because we are binding to the WMC
ames that
a casual inspection by every pair of eyes that tried to help him missed the
difference.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/AjaxButton-not-calling-onError-after-required-validation-fail-tp4678346p4678393.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing
actually IS there, there's just nothing
> in it.
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.
> n4.nabble.com/AjaxButton-not-calling-onError-after-
> required-validation-fail-tp4678346p4678384.html
> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble
-not-calling-onError-after-required-validation-fail-tp4678346p4678384.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail
> Yes, form.onError() seems to be called. But with no ajax target, how can I
> add the right feedback panel components to the target?
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.
> n4.nabble.com/AjaxButton-not-calling-onError-after-
> required-va
, form.onError() seems to be called. But with no ajax target, how can I
add the right feedback panel components to the target?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/AjaxButton-not-calling-onError-after-required-validation-fail-tp4678346p4678362.html
Sent from
gt; .setOutputMarkupId(true)
> .setOutputMarkupPlaceholderTag(true)
> );
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.
> n4.nabble.com/AjaxButton-not-calling-onError-after-
> required-validation-fail-tp46
message
target.add(radioWmc2Step1);
};
}
.setOutputMarkupId(true)
.setOutputMarkupPlaceholderTag(true)
);
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/AjaxButton-not-calling-onE
Hi,
You can do this by adding OnChangeAjaxBehavior("change") to each and every
form component.
This way they will send their values to the server as soon as they are
edited. If the value is valid then it will be stored in the model, if not -
only this form component will render its invalid
Hey there, so I have a form with many textfields all of which have
validators on them. In a situation where I’m creating a “new” record, all
the fields are blank. I also have a DropDownChoice object with an
AjaxFormSubmitBehavior (“change”) attached.
If the user clicks “save” prematurely,
ul hints related to a ClassCastException and to
> a
> > missing call to tabbedPanel.setOutputMarkupId(true) .
> >
> > Thank you for quick response.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ulrich Knaack
> >
> >
> > > -Ursprüngliche N
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org]
> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 15:04
> > An: users@wicket.apache.org
> > Betreff: Re: Modal dialog, form validation in AjaxBootstrapTabbedPanel
> >
> > Hi,
> >
&g
> Von: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 15:04
> An: users@wicket.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Modal dialog, form validation in AjaxBootstrapTabbedPanel
>
> Hi,
>
> I think I see the problem.
> When using AjaxBootstrapTabbe
> Von: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 15:04
> An: users@wicket.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Modal dialog, form validation in AjaxBootstrapTabbedPanel
>
> Hi,
>
> I think I see the problem.
> When using AjaxBootstrapTabbe
/bootstrap-core/src/main/java/de/agilecoders/wicket/core/markup/html/bootstrap/tabs/ClientSideBootstrapTabbedPanel.java
instead. It will switch the tabs
via JavaScript and make the validation once you use the submit button.
If this doesn't help you then I'll try to take a look at your application
after
AbstractFormValidator and he is going that way.
The only odd part is that it seems like we've done this before and not had
this problem. But we haven't gone looking, so can't be sure.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/AjaxButton-submits-despite-form-validation
common
> pitfall that someone will recognize instantly.
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.
> n4.nabble.com/AjaxButton-submits-despite-form-
> validation-failure-tp4677463.html
> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/AjaxButton-submits-despite-form-validation-failure-tp4677463.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
endentFormComponents() should only return
> visible components.
>
> Have fun
> Sven
>
>
> Am 03.11.2016 um 21:40 schrieb Marcel Barbosa Pinto:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a form which has some fields with validation attached to them.
>> When the user authenti
:
Hello,
I have a form which has some fields with validation attached to them.
When the user authenticates I hide some form elements.
When the form is submitted I receive a Warn log entry:
o.a.wicket.markup.html.form.Form - IFormValidator in form `form` depends on
a component that has been removed
Hello,
I have a form which has some fields with validation attached to them.
When the user authenticates I hide some form elements.
When the form is submitted I receive a Warn log entry:
o.a.wicket.markup.html.form.Form - IFormValidator in form `form` depends on
a component that has been
Well, the user is entering a part number (SKU) and there are times where
we’ve specified replacement SKUs. If I find only 1, then I want to replace
and continue, but if I don’t, I want to continue the existing validation
and maybe it finds a valid part or maybe it gives the user a message
Hi,
I find it confusing that the user enters "A" and if the validation fails
(s)he sees "B".
Me, as a user, I'd ask myself: I've entered "A", why it tells me that "B"
is incorrect?!
Maybe a better way is to use better error feedback messages than repl
Okay, that works. Do you think my approach to use a converter is
appropriate or should I do it in another place (like validation)?
Thanks for your input,
Lon
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Martin Makundi <
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
> We have made an utility method
you doing that?”,
> but I have this need regardless and here’s what it is… :D
>
> User inputs “VALUEA”, I want to look up something in the database for
> “VALUEA”, and if conditions are met, replace that with “VALUEB” and
> continue with validation for the new value. However, the on
Okay, so I have a need…I’m sure I’m going to get “why are you doing that?”,
but I have this need regardless and here’s what it is… :D
User inputs “VALUEA”, I want to look up something in the database for
“VALUEA”, and if conditions are met, replace that with “VALUEB” and
continue with validation
Thanks for fast answer :)
--
Daniel
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The version is intended to be used by the browser for client side caching,
> not by Wicket. That's why it is just stripped off by Wicket withou
Hi,
The version is intended to be used by the browser for client side caching,
not by Wicket. That's why it is just stripped off by Wicket without any
validation.
Actually if Wicket rejects it then you won't be able to update your
resources in new application versions.
Martin Grigorov
Wicket
Hi,
By default Wicket (6.x) uses IResourceCachingStrategy which generates
resource urls like this one:
http://host/myapp/wicket/resource/com.mycompany.BootstrapBehavior/js/timepicker/bootstrap-timepicker-ver-1E0DAFB24FE33C93370DE13BF6FFE77F.js
But as a user I can generate almost any version
2016 00:23, Lon Varscsak wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hey guys,
> > >>
> > >> I have some business logic where when the set method is called, it
> first
> > >> validates the value. In finding a “bad” value, it then throws a
> custom
>
> >
> >
> > On 19.05.2016 00:23, Lon Varscsak wrote:
> >
> >> Hey guys,
> >>
> >> I have some business logic where when the set method is called, it first
> >> validates the value. In finding a “bad” value, it then throws a custom
>
Hey Martin, well the exception is being thrown during the form submit
processing, but it just ends up as a big error on the page.
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Wicket cares about validation errors only during form su
ates the value. In finding a “bad” value, it then throws a custom
>> validation exception. We use this pattern all over the place.
>>
>> Is there some way to handle this situation so that it’s a val
, it then throws a custom
validation exception. We use this pattern all over the place.
Is there some way to handle this situation so that it’s a valid wicket
validation error?
Thanks for any tips.
-Lon (Wicket Newb :D
Hi,
Wicket cares about validation errors only during form submit processing.
In your case you could throw ConversionException during the 'convertInput'
phase.
I.e. in the beginning of the form submit processing Wicket will try to
convert the String input to the backend object (e.g. a String
Hey guys,
I have some business logic where when the set method is called, it first
validates the value. In finding a “bad” value, it then throws a custom
validation exception. We use this pattern all over the place.
Is there some way to handle this situation so that it’s a valid wicket
Hi,
calling myTextField.clearInput() would be the recommended solution.
Have fun
Sven
On 11.05.2016 17:31, marco di gasbarro wrote:
Hey All,
I'm dealing with a user interaction problem after a failed Form validation.
In fact I have a Form with two components: a DropDownChoice and a TextField
Hey All,
I'm dealing with a user interaction problem after a failed Form validation.
In fact I have a Form with two components: a DropDownChoice and a TextField.
The DropDownChoice has an AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior attached, which
modifies the TextField's model object and then adds
Hi Martin,
Yes but the 42Lines library did contain ValidationForm which allowed
validation of class level constraints. This component is missing in the
merged library.
If it has been removed for some reason, is there another way to do class
level validation?
Eugen Berenstein
Hi
Hi,
I need to apply cross field constraints to an object with JSR-303. As I
understand class level constraints are the correct tool for this.
Is there a way in Wicket 7 or 8 to apply these on a Form's model object?
I have tried the 42lines:wicket-bean-validation library but the release
1.1
Hi,
42Lines Bean Validation has been merged to Wicket since 6.x
The code is at https://github.com/apache/wicket/tree/master/wicket-bean-
validation
Examples: http://examples7x.wicket.apache.org/bean-validation/
Documentation:
https://ci.apache.org/projects/wicket/guide/7.x/guide/forms2
)
When the entire form is submitted (via an AjaxButton)
the ajaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior.onEvent() is called
then the formComponent.validate() is called
and then when the form.validate() is called
formComponent.validate() is called again.
Could it possible to avoid this double validation ?
Do I
() is called
formComponent.validate() is called again.
Could it possible to avoid this double validation ?
Do I have to override AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior.onEvent() ? ... or
there is a simple way to do this ?
2) is it possible to remove a formComponent's validator just after the
button.submit
and then when the form.validate() is called
formComponent.validate() is called again.
Could it possible to avoid this double validation ?
Do I have to override AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior.onEvent() ? ...
or there is a simple way to do this ?
2) is it possible to remove
an AjaxButton)
the ajaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior.onEvent() is called
then the formComponent.validate() is called
and then when the form.validate() is called
formComponent.validate() is called again.
Could it possible to avoid this double validation ?
Do I have to override
)
the ajaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior.onEvent() is called
then the formComponent.validate() is called
and then when the form.validate() is called
formComponent.validate() is called again.
Could it possible to avoid this double validation ?
Do I have to override
it all right away. So they can enter the record in a sort of scratch way,
leaving fields blank initially. But, if they enter something, we will apply
full validation.
However, we want to tell the user that the field is required...but save it
anyway. So imagine the user fills out 50
,
leaving fields blank initially. But, if they enter something, we will apply
full validation.
However, we want to tell the user that the field is required...but save it
anyway. So imagine the user fills out 50% of the fields, sees errors on
blur for format failures, then hits save. The form
Thank you, Martin,
I have used ReuseIfModelsEqualStrategy and the validation message side of it
work but now I have a different problem.
When I navigate away from the form panel, update the list of objects and
navigate back to the FormComponentPanel that holds the RefreshingView, only
one item
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 3:16 PM, lucast lucastol...@hotmail.com wrote:
Thank you, Martin,
I have used ReuseIfModelsEqualStrategy and the validation message side of
it
work but now I have a different problem.
When I navigate away from the form panel, update the list of objects
the sense of
perspective, but I cannot see what I am doing wrong.
Kind regards,
Lucas
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/validation-in-form-component-panels-in-RefreshingView-tp4669068p4669088.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive
and I find it most puzzling.
Any tips, or hints in the right direction will be much appreciated.
Thanks, once more,
Lucas
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/validation-in-form-component-panels-in-RefreshingView-tp4669068p4669090.html
Sent from the Users
field FieldDecorators.
If I use RepeatingView, error messages are displayed as intended. But my
list is dynamic.
How can I get the proper validation message displayed inside the form
component panel, used in a RefreshingView?
Thanks in advance,
Lucas
--
View this message in context:
http
on the text field FieldDecorators.
If I use RepeatingView, error messages are displayed as intended. But my
list is dynamic.
How can I get the proper validation message displayed inside the form
component panel, used in a RefreshingView?
Thanks in advance,
Lucas
--
View this message
Hey all,
Recenty, probably after moving to Wicket 6.16, we see some strange behavior
for TextAreas.
We have been using a JavaScript library to limit the number of characters a
user can enter in a textbox for years. Now we started getting validation
exceptions on the server that the user entered
wrote:
Hey all,
Recenty, probably after moving to Wicket 6.16, we see some strange behavior
for TextAreas.
We have been using a JavaScript library to limit the number of characters a
user can enter in a textbox for years. Now we started getting validation
exceptions on the server that the user
. So I can't stop the pop-up from showing
if the questions were not answered correctly.
Does anyone know a way I can display the modal dialog only after validation
has run?
Thanks,
Bruce
-
To unsubscribe, e
seems to run as soon as the button is clicked - before onSubmit
or onValidate runs on the server. So I can't stop the pop-up from showing
if the questions were not answered correctly.
Does anyone know a way I can display the modal dialog only after validation
has run?
Thanks
dialog only after validation
has run?
Thanks,
Bruce
of class Form of the AjaxTabbedPanel but one
could as well submit a form containing the AjaxTabbedPanel)
- My own validation utility that validates objects using wicket's
validation framework. This is more or less an object that allows the
developer to attach validators to class properties
My recommendation would be to use bean validation and Ajax to update the UI.
On Tuesday, May 6, 2014, mscoon msc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I have a complex form for editing existing objects. I am planning to use
AjaxTabbedPanel with adapted ajax links for the tabs to submit the current
The easiest solution I can think of. Why do you want to avoid that?
Cheers,
-Tom
On 06.05.2014, at 16:13, mscoon msc...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way to solve this? Client side tabs are a solution I guess but
one I'd like to avoid if possible.
wicket validators to execute because the request will only contain post
data for the active tab.
Is there a way to solve this? Client side tabs are a solution I guess but
one I'd like to avoid if possible.
I did consider moving my validation logic to a server side validation
method. The problem here
.
New row is added between 161 - 192 lines of code which is called at line
118
in the uploaded file.
Thanks
Venky
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Validation-not-working-in-Model-Window-on-Dynamic-rows-addition-tp4665011p4665013.html
Sent from
Yes, it is just experiment.
Also, when the Addrow is clicked, the validation is not getting fired and
the form is getting null, as i'm clueless why it is not working only in
ModelWindow and how it is working in regular page.
Thanks
Venky
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket
Best regards
Venky
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Validation-not-working-in-Model-Window-on-Dynamic-rows-addition-tp4665011.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com
is added between 161 - 192 lines of code which is called at line 118
in the uploaded file.
Thanks
Venky
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Validation-not-working-in-Model-Window-on-Dynamic-rows-addition-tp4665011p4665013.html
Sent from the Users forum
org.wicketstuff.lazymodel.LazyColumnTest
Regards,
Gabriel.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicketstuff-lazymodel-and-wicket-bean-validation-tp4660857p4660935.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com
,
Gabriel.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicketstuff-lazymodel-and-wicket-bean-validation-tp4660857p4660935.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Looking further at my code, I see that the custom validators from the inner
form DO get called; but the one that doesn't get called is
.setRequired(true). There is one component in the inner form which is
setRequired(true). And that validation is bypassed for some reason, although
all the other
.nabble.com/Forcing-Form-Validation-from-another-Form-s-onValidate-tp4660895p4660918.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional
I have a Panel (P1) which contains its own form (P1_F1).
The P1 panel also contains another panel inside itself, P1_A, which has its
own inner form (let's call it P1_A_F1).
Whenever the P_F1's validation is called, I also have to call the P1_A_F1
form validation. It doesn't get called
@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Forcing Form Validation from another Form's onValidate()
I have a Panel (P1) which contains its own form (P1_F1).
The P1 panel also contains another panel inside itself, P1_A, which has its
own inner form (let's call it P1_A_F1).
Whenever the P_F1's validation is called, I
In the final HTML, my form is flattened out, there is only Form.
In my Wicket markup, the structure is:
PANEL - FORM - SecondPanel - SecondForm
The main PANEL's FORM is being submitted, and validated. But the
SecondForm validation never gets called.
--
View this message in context:
http
://wicket.apache.org/learn/books/freeguide.html
In my Wicket markup, the structure is:
PANEL - FORM - SecondPanel - SecondForm
The main PANEL's FORM is being submitted, and validated. But the
SecondForm validation never gets called.
So you want to validate the inner nested form when submitting the outer
parent
(), fieldName);
}
return null;
}
}
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicketstuff-lazymodel-and-wicket-bean-validation-tp4660857p4660872.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com
:
Hi,
I've been using wicketstuff-lazymodel for weeks now and I love it!
Now I'm trying to use it with wicket-bean-validation, but I've got the
following error :
/Could not resolve Property from component: [TextField [Component id =
code]]. Either specify the Property in the constructor or use
to
use them...
Any help on this would be nice also :-).
Gabriel.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicketstuff-lazymodel-and-wicket-bean-validation-tp4660857p4660871.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com
new Property(((IObjectClassAwareModel?)
lazyModel.getTarget()).getObjectClass(), fieldName);
}
return null;
}
}
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicketstuff-lazymodel-and-wicket-bean-validation-tp4660857p4660872
1 - 100 of 1043 matches
Mail list logo
