Re: WICKET-2882 Enclosures issue

2010-05-24 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
Fixed in 1.4.x. Can you try a snapshot build and verify? -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Chris Colman chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com wrote: Ditto bro! I'm very keen to migrate from 1.4.1 up to the latest 1.9.x. WHOA! You

RE: WICKET-2882 Enclosures issue

2010-05-24 Thread Chris Colman
Fixed in 1.4.x. Cool! Thanks for such a quick turn around on that one. Can you try a snapshot build and verify? Yes. By snapshot do you mean there is a prebuilt snapshot ready to download somewhere or will I need to create my own snapshot from svn and build it? -- Jeremy Thomerson

Re: WICKET-2882 Enclosures issue

2010-05-24 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Chris Colman chr...@stepaheadsoftware.comwrote: Fixed in 1.4.x. Cool! Thanks for such a quick turn around on that one. Can you try a snapshot build and verify? Yes. By snapshot do you mean there is a prebuilt snapshot ready to download somewhere or will I

RE: WICKET-2882 Enclosures issue

2010-05-24 Thread Chris Colman
Fixed in 1.4.x. Can you try a snapshot build and verify? I built a snapshot and tested it. It works beautifully! Thanks for fixing this one. Regards, Chris -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Chris Colman chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com wrote:

Re: WICKET-2882 Enclosures issue

2010-05-23 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Chris Colman chr...@stepaheadsoftware.comwrote: Ditto bro! I'm very keen to migrate from 1.4.1 up to the latest 1.9.x. WHOA! You guys must be working pretty hard in submarine mode. I mean, Igor's only working on 1.5.x and I thought he was on the

RE: WICKET-2882 Enclosures issue

2010-05-23 Thread Chris Colman
Ditto bro! I'm very keen to migrate from 1.4.1 up to the latest 1.9.x. WHOA! You guys must be working pretty hard in submarine mode. I mean, Igor's only working on 1.5.x and I thought he was on the bleeding edge :) Yeah, whoops! I meant to say 1.4.9 ... (I had intended to keep

Re: WICKET-2882 Enclosures issue

2010-05-22 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Chris Colman chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com wrote: Ditto bro! I'm very keen to migrate from 1.4.1 up to the latest 1.9.x. WHOA! You guys must be working pretty hard in submarine mode. I mean, Igor's only working on 1.5.x and I thought he was on the bleeding

RE: WICKET-2882 Enclosures issue

2010-05-22 Thread Chris Colman
Ditto bro! I'm very keen to migrate from 1.4.1 up to the latest 1.9.x. WHOA! You guys must be working pretty hard in submarine mode. I mean, Igor's only working on 1.5.x and I thought he was on the bleeding edge :) Yeah, whoops! I meant to say 1.4.9 ... (I had intended to keep our

WICKET-2882 Enclosures issue

2010-05-21 Thread Chris Colman
Enclosures have to be one of the top ten awesome features of wicket as they allow us to wrap the many optional components in our CMS. They're awesome because the 'wrapping' is automatically ditched if the 'wrappee' is not visible. I was just wondering if anyone was able to reproduce this issue

Re: WICKET-2882 Enclosures issue

2010-05-21 Thread Martin Makundi
Is this also same as: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2636 ? I whish this could be fixed for 1.4.9.1 ** Martin 2010/5/21 Chris Colman chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com: Enclosures have to be one of the top ten awesome features of wicket as they allow us to wrap the many optional

RE: WICKET-2882 Enclosures issue

2010-05-21 Thread Chris Colman
Is this also same as: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2636 ? It looks very similar though the conditions are slightly different. 2882 doesn't need to be in an 'extends' markup context to occur. I note this from the comments in 2636: wicket:component - Creates a Wicket component on