Fixed in 1.4.x. Can you try a snapshot build and verify?
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Chris Colman chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com
wrote:
Ditto bro! I'm very keen to migrate from 1.4.1 up to the latest
1.9.x.
WHOA! You
Fixed in 1.4.x.
Cool! Thanks for such a quick turn around on that one.
Can you try a snapshot build and verify?
Yes. By snapshot do you mean there is a prebuilt snapshot ready to
download somewhere or will I need to create my own snapshot from svn and
build it?
--
Jeremy Thomerson
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Chris Colman
chr...@stepaheadsoftware.comwrote:
Fixed in 1.4.x.
Cool! Thanks for such a quick turn around on that one.
Can you try a snapshot build and verify?
Yes. By snapshot do you mean there is a prebuilt snapshot ready to
download somewhere or will I
Fixed in 1.4.x. Can you try a snapshot build and verify?
I built a snapshot and tested it. It works beautifully! Thanks for
fixing this one.
Regards,
Chris
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Chris Colman
chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com
wrote:
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Chris Colman
chr...@stepaheadsoftware.comwrote:
Ditto bro! I'm very keen to migrate from 1.4.1 up to the latest
1.9.x.
WHOA! You guys must be working pretty hard in submarine mode. I
mean,
Igor's only working on 1.5.x and I thought he was on the
Ditto bro! I'm very keen to migrate from 1.4.1 up to the latest
1.9.x.
WHOA! You guys must be working pretty hard in submarine mode. I
mean,
Igor's only working on 1.5.x and I thought he was on the bleeding
edge
:)
Yeah, whoops! I meant to say 1.4.9 ... (I had intended to keep
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Chris Colman chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com
wrote:
Ditto bro! I'm very keen to migrate from 1.4.1 up to the latest 1.9.x.
WHOA! You guys must be working pretty hard in submarine mode. I mean,
Igor's only working on 1.5.x and I thought he was on the bleeding
Ditto bro! I'm very keen to migrate from 1.4.1 up to the latest
1.9.x.
WHOA! You guys must be working pretty hard in submarine mode. I
mean,
Igor's only working on 1.5.x and I thought he was on the bleeding edge
:)
Yeah, whoops! I meant to say 1.4.9 ... (I had intended to keep our
Enclosures have to be one of the top ten awesome features of wicket as
they allow us to wrap the many optional components in our CMS. They're
awesome because the 'wrapping' is automatically ditched if the 'wrappee'
is not visible.
I was just wondering if anyone was able to reproduce this issue
Is this also same as: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2636
?
I whish this could be fixed for 1.4.9.1
**
Martin
2010/5/21 Chris Colman chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com:
Enclosures have to be one of the top ten awesome features of wicket as
they allow us to wrap the many optional
Is this also same as: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2636 ?
It looks very similar though the conditions are slightly different. 2882
doesn't need to be in an 'extends' markup context to occur.
I note this from the comments in 2636:
wicket:component - Creates a Wicket component on
11 matches
Mail list logo