Hi igor,
that's exactly where I discovered the existence of Check ;-)
Being an almost complete newby I was surprised by the existence of 2 Classes
so closely related. That is functionally related, since as far as I can tell
from the javadoc they are not related in any way.
regards,
Minto
thats because they are not functionally related at all. just because
they both represent a checkbox doesnt mean they are functionally
equivalent.
CheckBox only works with a imodelboolean
while CheckGroup/Check can be used to populate a collection with
arbitrary items. eg Check uses IModelT while
Thanx for clearing that up :-)
Minto
igor.vaynberg wrote:
...
CheckBox only works with a imodelboolean
while CheckGroup/Check can be used to populate a collection with
arbitrary items. eg Check uses IModelT while CheckGroup uses
IModelCollectionT
...
--
View this message in
Messing around with unittesting a CheckBox, I discovered Check as well:
org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Check;
org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.CheckBox;
To me it's not very clean what the difference is, since they are both
attached to the same markup:
input type=checkbox ...
the main difference is that checks belong to a checkgroup (useful in
repeaters) and checkbox is convenient when used alone
check out http://www.wicketstuff.org/wicket13/forminput/ ;-)
regards,
Michael
Minto van der Sluis wrote:
Messing around with unittesting a CheckBox, I discovered
Hi,
I read about Wicket-spring integration at
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/spring.html and now I wonder what's the
difference between
- extending SpringWebApplication combined with doing
addComponentInstantiationListener(new SpringComponentInjector(this))
in init(), and
- just
://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/spring.html and now I wonder what's the
difference between
- extending SpringWebApplication combined with doing
addComponentInstantiationListener(new SpringComponentInjector(this))
in init(), and
- just doing
addComponentInstantiationListener
SpringWebApplication only helps if you are on jdk1.4 or cannot use
@SpringBean annotation.
-igor
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Martijn Lindhout
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I read about Wicket-spring integration at
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/spring.html and now I wonder what's
Dear all,
I don't konw what's the difference, Because they are both working well.
Have some significant performances different?
-rosenjiang
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/what%27s-the-difference-between-setResponsePage%28java.lang.Class-pageClass%29---setResponsePage
of the time you can use
hybrid url encoding)
johan
On Feb 10, 2008 2:20 PM, rosen jiang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all,
I don't konw what's the difference, Because they are both working well.
Have some significant performances different?
-rosenjiang
--
View this message in context:
http
if you want to pass information to pages on the
serverside
also this generates a session spefic url (most of the time you can use
hybrid url encoding)
johan
On Feb 10, 2008 2:20 PM, rosen jiang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all,
I don't konw what's the difference, Because they are both
11 matches
Mail list logo
