Re: Wicket AJAX vs Echo AJAX

2007-10-12 Thread Igor Vaynberg
wicket's ajax requirements are somewhat unique, thus we have our own ajax implementation. there is a dojo integration in wicket-stuff if you want to use dojo components, but beware it is not supported by the wicket core team. -igor On 10/12/07, Chris Colman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Shor

RE: Wicket AJAX vs Echo AJAX

2007-10-12 Thread Chris Colman
> Short answer : You do not have to write a single line of javascriptcode > to use wicket ajax behaviors. This is already done for you. Great! > Regarding browser differences, I belive they are handled(by > wicket-ajax). AFAIK in beta 4 even safari works:) Another question: How does Dojo fit int

Re: Wicket AJAX vs Echo AJAX

2007-10-12 Thread Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
Short answer : You do not have to write a single line of javascriptcode to use wicket ajax behaviors. This is already done for you. Regarding browser differences, I belive they are handled(by wicket-ajax). AFAIK in beta 4 even safari works:) Chris Colman wrote: To date we've built all of our

Wicket AJAX vs Echo AJAX

2007-10-12 Thread Chris Colman
To date we've built all of our static pages in Wicket and all dynamic pages/user input forms etc., in Echo because it provides a pure Java (no need to write any JavaScript) solution to generating AJAX powered pages. The problem is when users switch from Echo pages back to Wicket pages using the br