RE: Wicket in a Dot Net World

2012-02-10 Thread Hielke Hoeve
] Sent: dinsdag 7 februari 2012 20:57 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Wicket in a Dot Net World Well friends, it's happened -- the company I work for has been bought by a larger competitor. Sadly, the new bosses prefer to work with .NET I don't suppose anyone has ported Wicket to .NET?

Re: Wicket in a Dot Net World

2012-02-09 Thread nino martinez wael
d -- the company I work for has been bought by a > larger competitor. Sadly, the new bosses prefer to work with .NET > > I don't suppose anyone has ported Wicket to .NET? > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-in-a-Dot-

RE: Wicket in a Dot Net World

2012-02-08 Thread Jeffrey Schneller
if done right (and very few are) a .NET site can be very clean and elegant in terms of the code architecture. Jeff -Original Message- From: shetc [mailto:sh...@bellsouth.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 2:57 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Wicket in a Dot Net World Well

RE: Wicket in a Dot Net World

2012-02-08 Thread Wilhelmsen Tor Iver
> I don't suppose anyone has ported Wicket to .NET? What, and lose all the "non-designable" ASP.Net or Razor goodness? :) - Tor Iver - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail

Re: Wicket in a Dot Net World

2012-02-07 Thread Martin Grigorov
to .NET? > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-in-a-Dot-Net-World-tp4366058p4366058.html > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ---

Wicket in a Dot Net World

2012-02-07 Thread shetc
Well friends, it's happened -- the company I work for has been bought by a larger competitor. Sadly, the new bosses prefer to work with .NET I don't suppose anyone has ported Wicket to .NET? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-in-a-Dot