1. Design concern (Wicket vs. ZK)
Both frameworks are thin-client and generate AJAX, the biggest difference is
Wicket uses Java and HTML while ZK uses XUL or other scripting language.
What's the advantage and disadvantage in both cases?
Advantage of HTML is that you can work with web
hi eelco,
I agree: especially if you break your application up in many panels,
it can be hard to keep an overview. So sometimes, there is something
to say for following a more page based approach in favor of
reusability. However, part of the argument still holds as even broken
up in panels,
in fact, select, choices (and radio) are still a weak part in wicket (imho).
there are many classes to deal with them, but most aren't customizable enough
and/or require different markup (span instead of select) as the designer would
put in.
It's certainly not a perfect framework, and we need
Hi,
Slightly off topic, but this is the summer vacation season on this
hemisphere, so I'm sure no one will mind:
On 8/16/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wicket assumes that UI designers are *designers* (and not
half-programmers like ZK assumes) only dealing with laying out, and
We've been using wicket for a couple of months now, our first
application is about to be deployed, so I looked back at the templates
and started wondering how much this separation of concerns applies to
us.
We have a base page with some panels supplied by subclasses, then
those panels are
for MEAP (nope, it's not
free) you can help use make that chapter perfect by giving us feedback
when it is available :)
Thanks,
Julie
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-vs.-ZK-tf4276516.html#a12188293
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
. Design concern (Wicket vs. ZK)
Both frameworks are thin-client and generate AJAX, the biggest difference is
Wicket uses Java and HTML while ZK uses XUL or other scripting language.
What's the advantage and disadvantage in both cases?
Advantage of HTML is that you can work with web designers standard
On 8/15/07, juliez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First, thanks for the reply!
2. AJAX components (Wicket vs. ZK)
you do not implement features like drag and drop or datepicker in wicket,
instead you wrap javascript libraries that implement those features with
wicket components.
I am actually
