Re: Wicket with some servlet container on Android?

2015-06-22 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Martin Grigorov, am Sonntag, 21. Juni 2015 um 23:09 schrieben Sie: > Netty doesn't support server side http sessions[...] > When running in Android there will be just one client so it > could be simplified. Exactly, one might even argue that using a session as cache only for performance

Re: Wicket with some servlet container on Android?

2015-06-21 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi, AFAICS i-jetty is the most promising one. But Netty project claims to support Android as an environment! [1], [2]. Netty doesn't support server side http sessions, so we should either implement custom ISessionStore ourselves (Apache CFX already has such impl, using Servlet APIs [3]) or use so

Re: Wicket with some servlet container on Android?

2015-06-21 Thread Sven Meier
Hi Martin, if there's a workable servlet container for Android, I'd just use that. >Except "because we can" I have to admit, that's the main reason for my suggestion :P. Have fun Sven On 21.06.2015 15:19, Martin Grigorov wrote: Hi Sven, On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Sven Meier wrote:

Re: Wicket with some servlet container on Android?

2015-06-21 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi Sven, On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Sven Meier wrote: > Hi Martin, > > >It shouldn't be hard to introduce some abstractions but Wicket is not > quite ready > >for non-Servlet usage at the moment. > > yeah, time to improve that :). > > If anyone provided patches and/or pull requests to remo

Re: Wicket with some servlet container on Android?

2015-06-21 Thread Sven Meier
Hi Martin, >It shouldn't be hard to introduce some abstractions but Wicket is not quite ready >for non-Servlet usage at the moment. yeah, time to improve that :). If anyone provided patches and/or pull requests to remove those dependencies, I'd be willing to support these changes. Regards

Re: Wicket with some servlet container on Android?

2015-06-21 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Sven Meier wrote: > Hi, > > >And why would that be interesting or preferable or whatever? > > because Wicket doesn't need servlets actually: Without the JEE baggage you > can keep your App smaller. > > > mean that the frontend needs adoption for both differe

Re: Wicket with some servlet container on Android?

2015-06-21 Thread Sven Meier
Hi, >And why would that be interesting or preferable or whatever? because Wicket doesn't need servlets actually: Without the JEE baggage you can keep your App smaller. > mean that the frontend needs adoption for both different environments All JEE related APIs are hidden behind Wicket specif

Re: Wicket with some servlet container on Android?

2015-06-21 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Sven Meier, am Samstag, 20. Juni 2015 um 20:18 schrieben Sie: > there seem to be different solutions already, why do you think they are > not promising? > https://github.com/jetty-project/i-jetty The commit history doesn't look very active to me and I've read that Tomcat and newer

Re: Wicket with some servlet container on Android?

2015-06-20 Thread Sven Meier
Hi, >I've found some posts about Jetty and Tomcat regarding this, >which don't look very promising. there seem to be different solutions already, why do you think they are not promising? https://github.com/jetty-project/i-jetty Actually it would be interesting to just skip all servlet st

Wicket with some servlet container on Android?

2015-06-20 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Hi all, we have a web app based on Wicket, Tomcat 7 etc. and one of our customers has a native Windows only app which is about to be replaced now to 1. support Android as well, 2. add some missing features and 3. provide some more modern GUI and such. The two most interesting things for that repla