Then maybe java.net.URLEncoder is more strict than the 'spec'... ok.
**
Martin
2009/2/17 Johan Compagner :
> as far as i know it does follow the spec specially for query portion and the
> path portions.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 08:26, Martin Makundi <
> martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com>
as far as i know it does follow the spec specially for query portion and the
path portions.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 08:26, Martin Makundi <
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The constructor WicketURLEncoder(Type type) explains a whole lot about
> the compatibility of QUERY_IN
Hi!
The constructor WicketURLEncoder(Type type) explains a whole lot about
the compatibility of QUERY_INSTANCE and java.net.URLEncoder.
However, the results differ significantly. Specifically the
"dontNeedEncoding" characters. We had a bit of a surprise integrating
our app with another app expect
