Re: Wicketstuff versioning

2010-03-24 Thread nino martinez wael
Yes, confluence is great, but a bit of useless since the spam-incident. I think the confluence is still full of with spammer users and spamcontents. Also the registration doesn't work, but this is an another issue. Nino, if I remember correctly, you can access confluence, right? Could you do

Re: Wicketstuff versioning

2010-03-23 Thread Boris Goldowsky
I may be wrong, but wouldn't it make sense to delay creating a 1.4.x branch until/unless someone actually wants to commit some code that would be different for 1.4.x and 1.5-SNAPSHOT? Once we branch, we have to start committing every bug fix to two different versions, right? If we're lucky,

Re: Wicketstuff versioning

2010-03-23 Thread Major Péter
2010-03-23 11:24 keltezéssel, Boris Goldowsky írta: I may be wrong, but wouldn't it make sense to delay creating a 1.4.x branch until/unless someone actually wants to commit some code that would be different for 1.4.x and 1.5-SNAPSHOT? Once we branch, we have to start committing every bug fix

RE: Wicketstuff versioning

2010-03-23 Thread Stefan Lindner
for current wicket 1.4? Stefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Major Péter [mailto:majorpe...@sch.bme.hu] Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. März 2010 11:38 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: Wicketstuff versioning 2010-03-23 11:24 keltezéssel, Boris Goldowsky írta: I may be wrong, but wouldn't

Re: Wicketstuff versioning

2010-03-23 Thread nino martinez wael
Nachricht- Von: Major Péter [mailto:majorpe...@sch.bme.hu] Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. März 2010 11:38 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: Wicketstuff versioning 2010-03-23 11:24 keltezéssel, Boris Goldowsky írta: I may be wrong, but wouldn't it make sense to delay creating a 1.4.x

Re: Wicketstuff versioning

2010-03-23 Thread Nicolai Guba
[mailto:majorpe...@sch.bme.hu] Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. März 2010 11:38 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: Wicketstuff versioning 2010-03-23 11:24 keltezéssel, Boris Goldowsky írta: I may be wrong, but wouldn't it make sense to delay creating a 1.4.x branch until/unless someone actually wants

Re: Wicketstuff versioning

2010-03-23 Thread Major Péter
An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: Wicketstuff versioning 2010-03-23 11:24 keltezéssel, Boris Goldowsky írta: I may be wrong, but wouldn't it make sense to delay creating a 1.4.x branch until/unless someone actually wants to commit some code that would be different for 1.4.x and 1.5

Re: Wicketstuff versioning

2010-03-23 Thread nino martinez wael
and create a core wicketstuff release for current wicket 1.4? Stefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Major Péter [mailto:majorpe...@sch.bme.hu] Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. März 2010 11:38 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: Wicketstuff versioning 2010-03-23 11:24 keltezéssel, Boris

Re: Wicketstuff versioning

2010-03-23 Thread Michael O'Cleirigh
Nachricht- Von: Major Péter [mailto:majorpe...@sch.bme.hu] Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. März 2010 11:38 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: Wicketstuff versioning 2010-03-23 11:24 keltezéssel, Boris Goldowsky írta: I may be wrong, but wouldn't it make sense to delay creating a 1.4.x branch

Re: Wicketstuff versioning

2010-03-23 Thread Boris Goldowsky
Péter [mailto:majorpe...@sch.bme.hu] Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. März 2010 11:38 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: Wicketstuff versioning 2010-03-23 11:24 keltezéssel, Boris Goldowsky írta: I may be wrong, but wouldn't it make sense to delay creating a 1.4.x branch until/unless someone

Re: Wicketstuff versioning

2010-03-23 Thread nino martinez wael
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Major Péter [mailto:majorpe...@sch.bme.hu] Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. März 2010 11:38 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: Wicketstuff versioning 2010-03-23 11:24 keltezéssel, Boris Goldowsky írta: I may be wrong, but wouldn't it make sense to delay creating

Re: Wicketstuff versioning

2010-03-23 Thread Major Péter
Hi, +1 on creating wicketstuff-core jira to coordinate release process. Here it is: http://wicketstuff.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa +1 on creating a wicketstuff-core/wicketstuff-test module to share testing code between core projects. +1 on running integration tests to find run-time

Re: Wicketstuff versioning

2010-03-22 Thread Major Péter
Yepp, nice chat, but who wants to do the dirty work?? The first thing would be to create the 1.4.x branch, then release the current state as wicketstuff 1.4.7, and then modify the settings of the trunk to compile with wicket trunk. Let's split these jobs up to people, then do it. Also maybe we

Re: Wicketstuff versioning

2010-03-19 Thread nino martinez wael
I'll be happy to join in Boris. 2010/3/18 Boris Goldowsky bgoldow...@cast.org Thank you for your thoughts Jeremy -- and your previous work on WicketStuff. I am certainly unhappy to hear that it felt like torture and that junk was being dumped on you rather than getting support from the

RE: Wicketstuff versioning

2010-03-19 Thread Stefan Lindner
[mailto:mcgreg...@e-card.bg] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. März 2010 09:09 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: Wicketstuff versioning Here is how I understand wicketstuff hosting: Someone makes something cool and decides to share it with the community. Then this person asks in the mailing lists for commit

Re: Wicketstuff versioning

2010-03-19 Thread Boris Goldowsky
nino martinez wael wrote: I'll be happy to join in Boris. That would be awesome, thanks Nino. I'm thinking the first thing would be to bump the wicket dependency to v1.4.7 and do a maven release of the current state of wicketstuff-core as version 1.4.7. Make sense? Is that something you

Re: Wicketstuff versioning

2010-03-19 Thread Major Péter
Hi, count me in. I would like to help maintain wicketstuff-core too. ;) When I came to build wicketstuff-core, sometimes I end up fixing dependency issues and other stuff in others projects, but I don't commit them, because I don't want to modify someone else's code without her/his knowledge, and

Re: Wicketstuff versioning

2010-03-19 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
2010/3/19 Major Péter majorpe...@sch.bme.hu Hi, count me in. I would like to help maintain wicketstuff-core too. ;) When I came to build wicketstuff-core, sometimes I end up fixing dependency issues and other stuff in others projects, but I don't commit them, because I don't want to modify

Re: Wicketstuff versioning

2010-03-18 Thread Martin Grigorov
Here is how I understand wicketstuff hosting: Someone makes something cool and decides to share it with the community. Then this person asks in the mailing lists for commit permissions. After that this person jumps into something else and don't have time to support the project. Later on I need

Re: Wicketstuff versioning

2010-03-18 Thread nino martinez wael
Exactly (I wrote something similar, but it apparently was declared spam:(). We could of course improve our structure as always, lifting the level a bit. As I see it wicketstuff are as ops4j, which brings advantages and disadvantages as well. -regards Nino 2010/3/18 Martin Grigorov

Re: Wicketstuff versioning

2010-03-18 Thread Boris Goldowsky
Thank you for your thoughts Jeremy -- and your previous work on WicketStuff. I am certainly unhappy to hear that it felt like torture and that junk was being dumped on you rather than getting support from the community. I'd volunteer to put a bit of time into this, but I don't have time to be

Re: Wicketstuff versioning

2010-03-17 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
Really, it should match what's at trunk of Wicket, which should be 1.5-SNAPSHOT. There should be a branch for 1.4.x that is 1.4-SNAPSHOT. But, nobody is really maintaining it any more, so it's a free-for-all. That's always been the problem with WicketStuff. -- Jeremy Thomerson

Re: Wicketstuff versioning

2010-03-17 Thread Boris Goldowsky
It sounds like whoever is responsible for wicketstuff needs to make a clear choice here. Is Wicketstuff going to be maintained as a place where lots of useful add-ons will live? If so, it needs someone to take a slightly more active role as curator; make sure the releases are done in

Re: Wicketstuff versioning

2010-03-17 Thread Major Péter
I always thought, that Jeremy was the maintainer of WicketStuff. Guess I was wrong. :) Sidenote: Also, I really wanted to write docs for the javaee-inject project, but I don't have confluence access, and the signup gives: org.springframework.transaction.UnexpectedRollbackException: Transaction

Re: Wicketstuff versioning

2010-03-17 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
Comments inline -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Boris Goldowsky bgoldow...@cast.orgwrote: It sounds like whoever is responsible for wicketstuff needs to make a clear choice here. The community is responsible for WicketStuff. This

Re: Wicketstuff versioning

2010-03-17 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
See other reply to Boris. Anyone can pick it up and become the maintainer of WS. But it's going to take a group of people who set some rules about it and then follow them. The problem with that is that then people *will* whine because they always wanted WicketStuff to be a no-rules repo. I

Wicketstuff versioning

2010-03-16 Thread Boris Goldowsky
The wicketstuff-core is calling itself version 1.4.2 in the HEAD of SVN. Shouldn't this be updated to 1.4.7 now to keep in sync with Wicket? Bng - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional