Re: YUI 3 anyone?

2010-05-01 Thread Douglas Ferguson
I thought wicket's goal was to be agnostic to this debate.

D/

On Apr 28, 2010, at 9:09 AM, nicolas melendez wrote:

 +1 YUI.
 I have been working with it, and it is a very good js framework, non
 intrusive with the markup, also was easy (i mean REALLY easy) to integrate
 to wicket.
 i used YUI components, like rich text editor or modal windows. I don't know
 the ajax how it is, because i use wicket ajax.
 NM
 
 On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Martijn Dashorst 
 martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 iirc the new implementation of Wicket ajax is slated for post 1.5.
 Something with too many irons in the fire...
 
 Martijn
 
 On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
 jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
 I also agree that we should use jQuery.  jQuery seems more aligned with
 Wicket than YUI.
 
 --
 Jeremy Thomerson
 http://www.wickettraining.com
 
 
 
 On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Fernando Wermus
 fernando.wer...@gmail.comwrote:
 
 +1 Jquery I mean
 
 On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Fernando Wermus 
 fernando.wer...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 +1
 
 
 On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 Hi
 i hope the dev team to consider jQuery , it seams it is the standard
 now
 ,
 used by all the big companies , even microsoft
 and although YUI is great, Yahoo has its own problem these days and
 we
 cannot consider the commited to the lib, they dropped support for
 many
 of
 their products and abandond many projects in the last 2 years
 
 this is my opinion only, u may make a vote or poll or something , or
 just
 pick YUI
 thanks
 Joe
 On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Jeremy Thomerson 
 jer...@wickettraining.com
 wrote:
 
 Yes, it's experimental, and it is not 100% decided that YUI will be
 used.
 
 --
 Jeremy Thomerson
 http://www.wickettraining.com
 
 
 
 On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro 
 reier...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Isn't this an experimental branch?
 
 Ernesto
 
 On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM, danisevsky 
 danisev...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 I think wicket 1.5 will use YUI 3. You can look to svn:
 
 
 
 
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/knopp/experimental/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/_wicket/ajax/
 
 
 2010/4/26 Istvan Soos istvan.s...@gmail.com
 
 Hi,
 
 Is there a cool best-practice or even better an integration
 library
 to
 use YUI 3? I know the standard generic way, I'm interested
 specifically in YUI 3...
 
 Thanks,
  Istvan
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 --
 Fernando Wermus.
 
 www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
 
 
 
 
 --
 Fernando Wermus.
 
 www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
 
 
 
 
 
 --
 Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
 Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications
 Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.7
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: YUI 3 anyone?

2010-05-01 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
Yes, but Wicket has a lot of JS functionality built in (for AJAX, DOM
manipulation related to AJAX, modal window, autocomplete, etc...).  Right
now all the AJAX stuff is done in home-grown JS.  There's no reason for us
to continue to support something that does things like DOM manipulation.  We
should use one of the many frameworks out there that do this already.

--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com



On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Douglas Ferguson doug...@douglasferguson.us
 wrote:

 I thought wicket's goal was to be agnostic to this debate.

 D/

 On Apr 28, 2010, at 9:09 AM, nicolas melendez wrote:

  +1 YUI.
  I have been working with it, and it is a very good js framework, non
  intrusive with the markup, also was easy (i mean REALLY easy) to
 integrate
  to wicket.
  i used YUI components, like rich text editor or modal windows. I don't
 know
  the ajax how it is, because i use wicket ajax.
  NM
 
  On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Martijn Dashorst 
  martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  iirc the new implementation of Wicket ajax is slated for post 1.5.
  Something with too many irons in the fire...
 
  Martijn
 
  On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
  jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
  I also agree that we should use jQuery.  jQuery seems more aligned with
  Wicket than YUI.
 
  --
  Jeremy Thomerson
  http://www.wickettraining.com
 
 
 
  On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Fernando Wermus
  fernando.wer...@gmail.comwrote:
 
  +1 Jquery I mean
 
  On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Fernando Wermus 
  fernando.wer...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
  +1
 
 
  On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
  Hi
  i hope the dev team to consider jQuery , it seams it is the standard
  now
  ,
  used by all the big companies , even microsoft
  and although YUI is great, Yahoo has its own problem these days and
  we
  cannot consider the commited to the lib, they dropped support for
  many
  of
  their products and abandond many projects in the last 2 years
 
  this is my opinion only, u may make a vote or poll or something , or
  just
  pick YUI
  thanks
  Joe
  On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Jeremy Thomerson 
  jer...@wickettraining.com
  wrote:
 
  Yes, it's experimental, and it is not 100% decided that YUI will be
  used.
 
  --
  Jeremy Thomerson
  http://www.wickettraining.com
 
 
 
  On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro 
  reier...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Isn't this an experimental branch?
 
  Ernesto
 
  On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM, danisevsky 
  danisev...@gmail.com
  wrote:
  I think wicket 1.5 will use YUI 3. You can look to svn:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/knopp/experimental/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/_wicket/ajax/
 
 
  2010/4/26 Istvan Soos istvan.s...@gmail.com
 
  Hi,
 
  Is there a cool best-practice or even better an integration
  library
  to
  use YUI 3? I know the standard generic way, I'm interested
  specifically in YUI 3...
 
  Thanks,
   Istvan
 
 
 
 -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 
 
 
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  --
  Fernando Wermus.
 
  www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
 
 
 
 
  --
  Fernando Wermus.
 
  www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
 
 
 
 
 
  --
  Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
  Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications
  Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.7
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




Re: YUI 3 anyone?

2010-05-01 Thread Igor Vaynberg
there is also no reason to bundle all the components that need that
kind of js as part of core, they can be stand alone modules.

-igor

On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
 Yes, but Wicket has a lot of JS functionality built in (for AJAX, DOM
 manipulation related to AJAX, modal window, autocomplete, etc...).  Right
 now all the AJAX stuff is done in home-grown JS.  There's no reason for us
 to continue to support something that does things like DOM manipulation.  We
 should use one of the many frameworks out there that do this already.

 --
 Jeremy Thomerson
 http://www.wickettraining.com



 On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Douglas Ferguson doug...@douglasferguson.us
 wrote:

 I thought wicket's goal was to be agnostic to this debate.

 D/

 On Apr 28, 2010, at 9:09 AM, nicolas melendez wrote:

  +1 YUI.
  I have been working with it, and it is a very good js framework, non
  intrusive with the markup, also was easy (i mean REALLY easy) to
 integrate
  to wicket.
  i used YUI components, like rich text editor or modal windows. I don't
 know
  the ajax how it is, because i use wicket ajax.
  NM
 
  On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Martijn Dashorst 
  martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  iirc the new implementation of Wicket ajax is slated for post 1.5.
  Something with too many irons in the fire...
 
  Martijn
 
  On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
  jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
  I also agree that we should use jQuery.  jQuery seems more aligned with
  Wicket than YUI.
 
  --
  Jeremy Thomerson
  http://www.wickettraining.com
 
 
 
  On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Fernando Wermus
  fernando.wer...@gmail.comwrote:
 
  +1 Jquery I mean
 
  On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Fernando Wermus 
  fernando.wer...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
  +1
 
 
  On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
  Hi
  i hope the dev team to consider jQuery , it seams it is the standard
  now
  ,
  used by all the big companies , even microsoft
  and although YUI is great, Yahoo has its own problem these days and
  we
  cannot consider the commited to the lib, they dropped support for
  many
  of
  their products and abandond many projects in the last 2 years
 
  this is my opinion only, u may make a vote or poll or something , or
  just
  pick YUI
  thanks
  Joe
  On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Jeremy Thomerson 
  jer...@wickettraining.com
  wrote:
 
  Yes, it's experimental, and it is not 100% decided that YUI will be
  used.
 
  --
  Jeremy Thomerson
  http://www.wickettraining.com
 
 
 
  On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro 
  reier...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Isn't this an experimental branch?
 
  Ernesto
 
  On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM, danisevsky 
  danisev...@gmail.com
  wrote:
  I think wicket 1.5 will use YUI 3. You can look to svn:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/knopp/experimental/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/_wicket/ajax/
 
 
  2010/4/26 Istvan Soos istvan.s...@gmail.com
 
  Hi,
 
  Is there a cool best-practice or even better an integration
  library
  to
  use YUI 3? I know the standard generic way, I'm interested
  specifically in YUI 3...
 
  Thanks,
   Istvan
 
 
 
 -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 
 
 
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  --
  Fernando Wermus.
 
  www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
 
 
 
 
  --
  Fernando Wermus.
 
  www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
 
 
 
 
 
  --
  Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
  Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications
  Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.7
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: YUI 3 anyone?

2010-05-01 Thread Douglas Ferguson
In that case +1 JQuery.

D/

On May 1, 2010, at 3:21 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:

 there is also no reason to bundle all the components that need that
 kind of js as part of core, they can be stand alone modules.
 
 -igor
 
 On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
 jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
 Yes, but Wicket has a lot of JS functionality built in (for AJAX, DOM
 manipulation related to AJAX, modal window, autocomplete, etc...).  Right
 now all the AJAX stuff is done in home-grown JS.  There's no reason for us
 to continue to support something that does things like DOM manipulation.  We
 should use one of the many frameworks out there that do this already.
 
 --
 Jeremy Thomerson
 http://www.wickettraining.com
 
 
 
 On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Douglas Ferguson doug...@douglasferguson.us
 wrote:
 
 I thought wicket's goal was to be agnostic to this debate.
 
 D/
 
 On Apr 28, 2010, at 9:09 AM, nicolas melendez wrote:
 
 +1 YUI.
 I have been working with it, and it is a very good js framework, non
 intrusive with the markup, also was easy (i mean REALLY easy) to
 integrate
 to wicket.
 i used YUI components, like rich text editor or modal windows. I don't
 know
 the ajax how it is, because i use wicket ajax.
 NM
 
 On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Martijn Dashorst 
 martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 iirc the new implementation of Wicket ajax is slated for post 1.5.
 Something with too many irons in the fire...
 
 Martijn
 
 On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
 jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
 I also agree that we should use jQuery.  jQuery seems more aligned with
 Wicket than YUI.
 
 --
 Jeremy Thomerson
 http://www.wickettraining.com
 
 
 
 On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Fernando Wermus
 fernando.wer...@gmail.comwrote:
 
 +1 Jquery I mean
 
 On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Fernando Wermus 
 fernando.wer...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 +1
 
 
 On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 Hi
 i hope the dev team to consider jQuery , it seams it is the standard
 now
 ,
 used by all the big companies , even microsoft
 and although YUI is great, Yahoo has its own problem these days and
 we
 cannot consider the commited to the lib, they dropped support for
 many
 of
 their products and abandond many projects in the last 2 years
 
 this is my opinion only, u may make a vote or poll or something , or
 just
 pick YUI
 thanks
 Joe
 On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Jeremy Thomerson 
 jer...@wickettraining.com
 wrote:
 
 Yes, it's experimental, and it is not 100% decided that YUI will be
 used.
 
 --
 Jeremy Thomerson
 http://www.wickettraining.com
 
 
 
 On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro 
 reier...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Isn't this an experimental branch?
 
 Ernesto
 
 On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM, danisevsky 
 danisev...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 I think wicket 1.5 will use YUI 3. You can look to svn:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/knopp/experimental/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/_wicket/ajax/
 
 
 2010/4/26 Istvan Soos istvan.s...@gmail.com
 
 Hi,
 
 Is there a cool best-practice or even better an integration
 library
 to
 use YUI 3? I know the standard generic way, I'm interested
 specifically in YUI 3...
 
 Thanks,
  Istvan
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 --
 Fernando Wermus.
 
 www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
 
 
 
 
 --
 Fernando Wermus.
 
 www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
 
 
 
 
 
 --
 Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
 Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications
 Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.7
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: YUI 3 anyone?

2010-04-28 Thread Fernando Wermus
+1

On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi
 i hope the dev team to consider jQuery , it seams it is the standard now ,
 used by all the big companies , even microsoft
 and although YUI is great, Yahoo has its own problem these days and we
 cannot consider the commited to the lib, they dropped support for many of
 their products and abandond many projects in the last 2 years

 this is my opinion only, u may make a vote or poll or something , or just
 pick YUI
 thanks
 Joe
 On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Jeremy Thomerson 
 jer...@wickettraining.com
  wrote:

  Yes, it's experimental, and it is not 100% decided that YUI will be used.
 
  --
  Jeremy Thomerson
  http://www.wickettraining.com
 
 
 
  On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro 
  reier...@gmail.com wrote:
 
   Isn't this an experimental branch?
  
   Ernesto
  
   On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM, danisevsky danisev...@gmail.com
  wrote:
I think wicket 1.5 will use YUI 3. You can look to svn:
   
  
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/knopp/experimental/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/_wicket/ajax/
   
   
2010/4/26 Istvan Soos istvan.s...@gmail.com
   
Hi,
   
Is there a cool best-practice or even better an integration library
 to
use YUI 3? I know the standard generic way, I'm interested
specifically in YUI 3...
   
Thanks,
  Istvan
   
   
 -
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
   
   
   
  
   -
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
   For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
  
  
 




-- 
Fernando Wermus.

www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus


Re: YUI 3 anyone?

2010-04-28 Thread Fernando Wermus
+1 Jquery I mean

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Fernando Wermus fernando.wer...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 +1


 On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi
 i hope the dev team to consider jQuery , it seams it is the standard now ,
 used by all the big companies , even microsoft
 and although YUI is great, Yahoo has its own problem these days and we
 cannot consider the commited to the lib, they dropped support for many of
 their products and abandond many projects in the last 2 years

 this is my opinion only, u may make a vote or poll or something , or just
 pick YUI
 thanks
 Joe
 On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Jeremy Thomerson 
 jer...@wickettraining.com
  wrote:

  Yes, it's experimental, and it is not 100% decided that YUI will be
 used.
 
  --
  Jeremy Thomerson
  http://www.wickettraining.com
 
 
 
  On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro 
  reier...@gmail.com wrote:
 
   Isn't this an experimental branch?
  
   Ernesto
  
   On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM, danisevsky danisev...@gmail.com
  wrote:
I think wicket 1.5 will use YUI 3. You can look to svn:
   
  
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/knopp/experimental/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/_wicket/ajax/
   
   
2010/4/26 Istvan Soos istvan.s...@gmail.com
   
Hi,
   
Is there a cool best-practice or even better an integration library
 to
use YUI 3? I know the standard generic way, I'm interested
specifically in YUI 3...
   
Thanks,
  Istvan
   
   
 -
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
   
   
   
  
   -
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
   For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
  
  
 




 --
 Fernando Wermus.

 www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus




-- 
Fernando Wermus.

www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus


Re: YUI 3 anyone?

2010-04-28 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
I also agree that we should use jQuery.  jQuery seems more aligned with
Wicket than YUI.

--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com



On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Fernando Wermus
fernando.wer...@gmail.comwrote:

 +1 Jquery I mean

 On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Fernando Wermus 
 fernando.wer...@gmail.com
  wrote:

  +1
 
 
  On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Hi
  i hope the dev team to consider jQuery , it seams it is the standard now
 ,
  used by all the big companies , even microsoft
  and although YUI is great, Yahoo has its own problem these days and we
  cannot consider the commited to the lib, they dropped support for many
 of
  their products and abandond many projects in the last 2 years
 
  this is my opinion only, u may make a vote or poll or something , or
 just
  pick YUI
  thanks
  Joe
  On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Jeremy Thomerson 
  jer...@wickettraining.com
   wrote:
 
   Yes, it's experimental, and it is not 100% decided that YUI will be
  used.
  
   --
   Jeremy Thomerson
   http://www.wickettraining.com
  
  
  
   On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro 
   reier...@gmail.com wrote:
  
Isn't this an experimental branch?
   
Ernesto
   
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM, danisevsky danisev...@gmail.com
   wrote:
 I think wicket 1.5 will use YUI 3. You can look to svn:

   
  
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/knopp/experimental/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/_wicket/ajax/


 2010/4/26 Istvan Soos istvan.s...@gmail.com

 Hi,

 Is there a cool best-practice or even better an integration
 library
  to
 use YUI 3? I know the standard generic way, I'm interested
 specifically in YUI 3...

 Thanks,
   Istvan


  -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



   
   
 -
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
   
   
  
 
 
 
 
  --
  Fernando Wermus.
 
  www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
 



 --
 Fernando Wermus.

 www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus



Re: YUI 3 anyone?

2010-04-28 Thread Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
I remember there was a long discussion on this list, some time ago,
about this...

About jQuery... jQuery isn't perfect either and I have heard of people
having bad experiences about their support. For instance, I have
reported a bug related to DD, IE and its usage in combination with
Wicket AJAX and their reaction was to close the bug because I was not
able to reproduce this only using jQuery. It seems the same bug has
been reported many times, in other contexts, and it hasn't been fixed
yet. In spite of this I'm still planning to use jQuery for my
projects.

At the end I think we should trust Wicket core developers and let them
do what they deem best for the framework.

Best,

Ernesto


On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi
 i hope the dev team to consider jQuery , it seams it is the standard now ,
 used by all the big companies , even microsoft
 and although YUI is great, Yahoo has its own problem these days and we
 cannot consider the commited to the lib, they dropped support for many of
 their products and abandond many projects in the last 2 years

 this is my opinion only, u may make a vote or poll or something , or just
 pick YUI
 thanks
 Joe
 On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com
 wrote:

 Yes, it's experimental, and it is not 100% decided that YUI will be used.

 --
 Jeremy Thomerson
 http://www.wickettraining.com



 On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro 
 reier...@gmail.com wrote:

  Isn't this an experimental branch?
 
  Ernesto
 
  On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM, danisevsky danisev...@gmail.com
 wrote:
   I think wicket 1.5 will use YUI 3. You can look to svn:
  
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/knopp/experimental/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/_wicket/ajax/
  
  
   2010/4/26 Istvan Soos istvan.s...@gmail.com
  
   Hi,
  
   Is there a cool best-practice or even better an integration library to
   use YUI 3? I know the standard generic way, I'm interested
   specifically in YUI 3...
  
   Thanks,
     Istvan
  
   -
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
   For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
  
  
  
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: YUI 3 anyone?

2010-04-28 Thread Martijn Dashorst
iirc the new implementation of Wicket ajax is slated for post 1.5.
Something with too many irons in the fire...

Martijn

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
 I also agree that we should use jQuery.  jQuery seems more aligned with
 Wicket than YUI.

 --
 Jeremy Thomerson
 http://www.wickettraining.com



 On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Fernando Wermus
 fernando.wer...@gmail.comwrote:

 +1 Jquery I mean

 On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Fernando Wermus 
 fernando.wer...@gmail.com
  wrote:

  +1
 
 
  On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Hi
  i hope the dev team to consider jQuery , it seams it is the standard now
 ,
  used by all the big companies , even microsoft
  and although YUI is great, Yahoo has its own problem these days and we
  cannot consider the commited to the lib, they dropped support for many
 of
  their products and abandond many projects in the last 2 years
 
  this is my opinion only, u may make a vote or poll or something , or
 just
  pick YUI
  thanks
  Joe
  On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Jeremy Thomerson 
  jer...@wickettraining.com
   wrote:
 
   Yes, it's experimental, and it is not 100% decided that YUI will be
  used.
  
   --
   Jeremy Thomerson
   http://www.wickettraining.com
  
  
  
   On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro 
   reier...@gmail.com wrote:
  
Isn't this an experimental branch?
   
Ernesto
   
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM, danisevsky danisev...@gmail.com
   wrote:
 I think wicket 1.5 will use YUI 3. You can look to svn:

   
  
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/knopp/experimental/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/_wicket/ajax/


 2010/4/26 Istvan Soos istvan.s...@gmail.com

 Hi,

 Is there a cool best-practice or even better an integration
 library
  to
 use YUI 3? I know the standard generic way, I'm interested
 specifically in YUI 3...

 Thanks,
   Istvan


  -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



   
   
 -
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
   
   
  
 
 
 
 
  --
  Fernando Wermus.
 
  www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
 



 --
 Fernando Wermus.

 www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus





-- 
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.7

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: YUI 3 anyone?

2010-04-28 Thread nicolas melendez
+1 YUI.
I have been working with it, and it is a very good js framework, non
intrusive with the markup, also was easy (i mean REALLY easy) to integrate
to wicket.
i used YUI components, like rich text editor or modal windows. I don't know
the ajax how it is, because i use wicket ajax.
NM

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Martijn Dashorst 
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:

 iirc the new implementation of Wicket ajax is slated for post 1.5.
 Something with too many irons in the fire...

 Martijn

 On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
 jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
  I also agree that we should use jQuery.  jQuery seems more aligned with
  Wicket than YUI.
 
  --
  Jeremy Thomerson
  http://www.wickettraining.com
 
 
 
  On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Fernando Wermus
  fernando.wer...@gmail.comwrote:
 
  +1 Jquery I mean
 
  On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Fernando Wermus 
  fernando.wer...@gmail.com
   wrote:
 
   +1
  
  
   On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  
   Hi
   i hope the dev team to consider jQuery , it seams it is the standard
 now
  ,
   used by all the big companies , even microsoft
   and although YUI is great, Yahoo has its own problem these days and
 we
   cannot consider the commited to the lib, they dropped support for
 many
  of
   their products and abandond many projects in the last 2 years
  
   this is my opinion only, u may make a vote or poll or something , or
  just
   pick YUI
   thanks
   Joe
   On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Jeremy Thomerson 
   jer...@wickettraining.com
wrote:
  
Yes, it's experimental, and it is not 100% decided that YUI will be
   used.
   
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
   
   
   
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro 
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
   
 Isn't this an experimental branch?

 Ernesto

 On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM, danisevsky 
 danisev...@gmail.com
wrote:
  I think wicket 1.5 will use YUI 3. You can look to svn:
 

   
  
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/knopp/experimental/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/_wicket/ajax/
 
 
  2010/4/26 Istvan Soos istvan.s...@gmail.com
 
  Hi,
 
  Is there a cool best-practice or even better an integration
  library
   to
  use YUI 3? I know the standard generic way, I'm interested
  specifically in YUI 3...
 
  Thanks,
Istvan
 
 
   -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 
 


  -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org


   
  
  
  
  
   --
   Fernando Wermus.
  
   www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
  
 
 
 
  --
  Fernando Wermus.
 
  www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
 
 



 --
 Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
 Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications
 Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.7

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




Re: YUI 3 anyone?

2010-04-27 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
Yes, it's experimental, and it is not 100% decided that YUI will be used.

--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com



On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro 
reier...@gmail.com wrote:

 Isn't this an experimental branch?

 Ernesto

 On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM, danisevsky danisev...@gmail.com wrote:
  I think wicket 1.5 will use YUI 3. You can look to svn:
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/knopp/experimental/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/_wicket/ajax/
 
 
  2010/4/26 Istvan Soos istvan.s...@gmail.com
 
  Hi,
 
  Is there a cool best-practice or even better an integration library to
  use YUI 3? I know the standard generic way, I'm interested
  specifically in YUI 3...
 
  Thanks,
Istvan
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




Re: YUI 3 anyone?

2010-04-27 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
I actually was working on this two weeks ago for a client.  Hopefully in the
next week I will have a very minimal base project available for you to build
from.

--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com



On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Istvan Soos istvan.s...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,

 Is there a cool best-practice or even better an integration library to
 use YUI 3? I know the standard generic way, I'm interested
 specifically in YUI 3...

 Thanks,
   Istvan

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




Re: YUI 3 anyone?

2010-04-27 Thread Joe Fawzy
Hi
i hope the dev team to consider jQuery , it seams it is the standard now ,
used by all the big companies , even microsoft
and although YUI is great, Yahoo has its own problem these days and we
cannot consider the commited to the lib, they dropped support for many of
their products and abandond many projects in the last 2 years

this is my opinion only, u may make a vote or poll or something , or just
pick YUI
thanks
Joe
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com
 wrote:

 Yes, it's experimental, and it is not 100% decided that YUI will be used.

 --
 Jeremy Thomerson
 http://www.wickettraining.com



 On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro 
 reier...@gmail.com wrote:

  Isn't this an experimental branch?
 
  Ernesto
 
  On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM, danisevsky danisev...@gmail.com
 wrote:
   I think wicket 1.5 will use YUI 3. You can look to svn:
  
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/knopp/experimental/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/_wicket/ajax/
  
  
   2010/4/26 Istvan Soos istvan.s...@gmail.com
  
   Hi,
  
   Is there a cool best-practice or even better an integration library to
   use YUI 3? I know the standard generic way, I'm interested
   specifically in YUI 3...
  
   Thanks,
 Istvan
  
   -
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
   For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
  
  
  
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 



YUI 3 anyone?

2010-04-26 Thread Istvan Soos
Hi,

Is there a cool best-practice or even better an integration library to
use YUI 3? I know the standard generic way, I'm interested
specifically in YUI 3...

Thanks,
   Istvan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: YUI 3 anyone?

2010-04-26 Thread danisevsky
I think wicket 1.5 will use YUI 3. You can look to svn:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/knopp/experimental/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/_wicket/ajax/


2010/4/26 Istvan Soos istvan.s...@gmail.com

 Hi,

 Is there a cool best-practice or even better an integration library to
 use YUI 3? I know the standard generic way, I'm interested
 specifically in YUI 3...

 Thanks,
   Istvan

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




Re: YUI 3 anyone?

2010-04-26 Thread Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
Isn't this an experimental branch?

Ernesto

On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM, danisevsky danisev...@gmail.com wrote:
 I think wicket 1.5 will use YUI 3. You can look to svn:
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/knopp/experimental/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/_wicket/ajax/


 2010/4/26 Istvan Soos istvan.s...@gmail.com

 Hi,

 Is there a cool best-practice or even better an integration library to
 use YUI 3? I know the standard generic way, I'm interested
 specifically in YUI 3...

 Thanks,
   Istvan

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org