>
>
> Sorry for those possibly dump questions.
> I'm more the functional UI and backend developer. This styling and layout
> should better be done by someone else. But I'd like to understand how it
> works.
>
I personnaly use fundation for the layout part. It works well with kendo
(at least), but
is make sense to use the full Wicket-Bootstrap integration then, or
would I be better off just putting in the required .js and .css.
Sorry for those possibly dump questions.
I'm more the functional UI and backend developer.
uot;k-" prefixed, so I don't think there will be
conflicts. For jQuery ui, there are "ui-" predixed iirc.
Just a warning however, both frameworks are big/complete frameworks, so
will end up with 2 big js and 2 big css...
>
> Man
lsewhere, say jQuery or Kendo, does it clash
with it's CSS?
Manfred
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Your-opinion-on-ShieldUI-tp4675649p4675685.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
velopers (Vladimir) is an ex-colleague of mine.
I've seen people asking questions about the integration at StackOverflow
and he responds there.
>
>
> Manfred
>
> --
> View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Your-opinion-on-ShieldUI-tp4675649p46756
it a while back.
>
> I assume that Wicket-JQuery-UI and Wicket-Bootstrap is?
I'd say - yes!
>
>
>
> Manfred
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Your-opinion-on-ShieldUI-tp4675649p4675659.html
&
ainers.
But that doesn't necessarily mean much.
Anyone using this out there?
Manfred
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Your-opinion-on-ShieldUI-tp4675649p4675660.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabb
OK, thanks for you reply.
What's the state of Wicket-Foundation?
I mean, is it mature enough for a large enterprise application?
I assume that Wicket-JQuery-UI and Wicket-Bootstrap is?
Manfred
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Your-opinion
compared to the standard widgets?
> Do all those also use the Wicket Model classes as the standard widgets?
> Are there other alternative for out-of-the box nice looking widgets for
> Apache Wicket?
>
> What is your opinion on ShieldU
, like which Wicket version is actually supported.
But how is unit testability compared to the standard widgets?
Do all those also use the Wicket Model classes as the standard widgets?
Are there other alternative for out-of-the box nice looking widgets for Apache
Wicket?
What is your opinion
10 matches
Mail list logo
