Re: is wicket well-suited for integrating JS widgets?
see wiclet-stuff svn repo, there are projects that integrate wicket with yui, scriptaculous, animator.js, gmap, mootools, openlayers, tinymce, dojo. if all those projects do it then its not so bad... :) https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/ -igor On 10/3/07, dukehoops <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm a complete newbie to wicket (coming from JSF, Swing world) and am in > process of building small examples as part of framework eval. > > I'm looking for a framework that'd make it easy to integrate arbitrary JS > ui > components. Let's say Y!UI or Script.aculo.us develops a new > super-accordion (or autocomplete 2.0) widget? > > Is Wicket designed in a way that'd make integrating this widget relatively > > easy? Or is this not considered an important use case? > > If it is an important use could, could someone please elaborate why Wicket > has own implementation of an Autocomplete widget (rather than integrating > an > existing one)? > > thanks > -nikita > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/is-wicket-well-suited-for-integrating-JS-widgets--tf4564309.html#a13027622 > > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
Re: is wicket well-suited for integrating JS widgets?
Hi, It's lot of easier to integrate JS lib with wicket, than with JSF. I currently work on JQuery's widget. About integration with YUI or Scriptaclus, take a look at wicketstuff.org (svn and wiki), there is already some project about it. Regards. dukehoops wrote: I'm a complete newbie to wicket (coming from JSF, Swing world) and am in process of building small examples as part of framework eval. I'm looking for a framework that'd make it easy to integrate arbitrary JS ui components. Let's say Y!UI or Script.aculo.us develops a new super-accordion (or autocomplete 2.0) widget? Is Wicket designed in a way that'd make integrating this widget relatively easy? Or is this not considered an important use case? If it is an important use could, could someone please elaborate why Wicket has own implementation of an Autocomplete widget (rather than integrating an existing one)? thanks -nikita - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is wicket well-suited for integrating JS widgets?
I'm a complete newbie to wicket (coming from JSF, Swing world) and am in process of building small examples as part of framework eval. I'm looking for a framework that'd make it easy to integrate arbitrary JS ui components. Let's say Y!UI or Script.aculo.us develops a new super-accordion (or autocomplete 2.0) widget? Is Wicket designed in a way that'd make integrating this widget relatively easy? Or is this not considered an important use case? If it is an important use could, could someone please elaborate why Wicket has own implementation of an Autocomplete widget (rather than integrating an existing one)? thanks -nikita -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/is-wicket-well-suited-for-integrating-JS-widgets--tf4564309.html#a13027622 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
