John, thanks for sharing this. It worked for me with the update from
Maven 2.0.9 to 2.1.0 on MacOS X.
Kaspar
On 03.04.2009, at 16:42, John Krasnay wrote:
FYI to anyone who's been bitten by this, there's a simple workaround.
Just add the following to your pom.xml:
maven-ec
> We've got a guy at work that swears by emacs and refuses to use
> anything else. Of course, he's the slowest guy on the project team
> and he never gets anything done.
Hehe if you generate say getters and setters for 20 fields with an
IDE, or type them all out instead - you have to type extreme
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Martijn Reuvers
wrote:
> What's wrong with using notepad or vi? Never such issues with them. :P
>
We've got a guy at work that swears by emacs and refuses to use
anything else. Of course, he's the slowest guy on the project team
and he never gets anything done.
What's wrong with using notepad or vi? Never such issues with them. :P
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 5:26 PM, James Carman
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Gwyn Evans wrote:
>>
>> Yes - use IDEA! :-)
>
> +1! (I can hear the sound of a can of worms opening)
---
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Gwyn Evans wrote:
>
> Yes - use IDEA! :-)
+1! (I can hear the sound of a can of worms opening)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 04:21:13PM +0100, Gwyn Evans wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:42 PM, John Krasnay wrote:
> > FYI to anyone who's been bitten by this, there's a simple workaround.
>
> Yes - use IDEA! :-)
>
What, haven't they "fixed" the maven-idea-plugin yet? Your time's
comin', pal! :
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:42 PM, John Krasnay wrote:
> FYI to anyone who's been bitten by this, there's a simple workaround.
Yes - use IDEA! :-)
/Gwyn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional
FYI to anyone who's been bitten by this, there's a simple workaround.
Just add the following to your pom.xml:
maven-eclipse-plugin
2.5.1
We did it in our parent POM and it's working fine.
jk
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 09:54:36AM -0400, Brill Pappin wro
*sigh*
I was referring to the suggestion that there be an option in the
archetype, and the disparaging thread that ensued.
However, I don't want to argue about this *again*.
...never mind...
- Brill
On 3-Apr-09, at 9:56 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Brill Pap
I think thats a good position.
I can't image that it was purposely done in order to enforce the maven
way, there are just too many people who would have broken builds.
- Brill
On 2-Apr-09, at 3:53 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
i just want to say one quick thing about this.
there are two great
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Brill Pappin wrote:
> failure to accommodate other
> resource usage patterns).
HUH?
Care to elaborate? Wicket doesn't force its patterns upon you (unlike
maven's eclipse 2.6 plugin). You are free to add your
html/properties/etc in src/main/resources without ever t
laugh
Although I think its too late to stop this thread growing, you should
all know that we just had this argument a few weeks ago!
It seems to be a touchy subject for some :)
The old thread can be found by searching for "Re: How can I share text
resources with multiple web applications?".
laugh
not again! ;)
- Brill
On 2-Apr-09, at 2:11 PM, Philippe Marschall wrote:
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Some brilliant guy thought it prudent to make the maven-eclipse-
plugin
only accept .java files from src/main/java and src/test/java in
version 2.6.
Well there's a reason these folder
Maybe I misread your post, but I thought you were saying that it
messes up where you want you meta files and forces you to use the
"maven" resource pattern?
- Brill
On 2-Apr-09, at 9:42 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Why fix something that isn't broken?
Martijn
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:36 P
>
> Ahh really? But i want to!!!
> Can i? Can i???
>
I've been busy for a while... so I want to! :P
Yes, I'm coming back... Run for your lives ;-)
Bruno Borges
blog.brunoborges.com.br
+55 21 76727099
"The glory of great men should always be
measured by the means they have used to
acquire it
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
wrote:
> Let's not even start this discussion again, please!
>
+1.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket
Ahh really? But i want to!!!
Can i? Can i???
On 02/04/2009, Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
> Let's not even start this discussion again, please!
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://www.wickettraining.com
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Philippe Marschall wrote:
>
>> You simply relied on a bug /
i just want to say one quick thing about this.
there are two great things about maven
1) it established a convention that eliminated a lot of boilerplate
2) it does not force the convention - everything can be overridden and
customized by configuring plugins
once the authors of maven and or plugi
Let's not even start this discussion again, please!
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Philippe Marschall wrote:
> You simply relied on a bug / undocumented featured. Move your resources
> where the belong into the resources folder.
>
> Cheers
>
James Carman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Philippe Marschall wrote:
>> Well there's a reason these folders are called java.
>
> Yes, but it's not specifically "illegal" in the maven world to put
> non-java files in there (didn't we have this argument a few days ago).
You simply rel
Looks like we have to wait for 2.6.1 or 2.7
"Known Issues:
* [MECLIPSE-443] - Only include **/*.java in Java source directories
may affect you if you use ajdt or have non-java sources in your
directories that you expect to be compiled
Release 2.6.1 (which may get renamed to 2.7) has fixed this i
New Facebook group: "I'll bet I can get 1 million people to bitch
about where resources should go in maven"
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Ryan Gravener wrote:
> Someone needs to start a facebook group and protest this change.
>
> Ryan Gravener
> http://ryangravener.com/flex | http://twitter.com
Someone needs to start a facebook group and protest this change.
Ryan Gravener
http://ryangravener.com/flex | http://twitter.com/ryangravener
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 2:14 PM, James Carman
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Philippe Marschall wrote:
> > Well there's a reason these folders
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Philippe Marschall wrote:
> Well there's a reason these folders are called java.
Yes, but it's not specifically "illegal" in the maven world to put
non-java files in there (didn't we have this argument a few days ago).
-
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> Some brilliant guy thought it prudent to make the maven-eclipse-plugin
> only accept .java files from src/main/java and src/test/java in
> version 2.6.
Well there's a reason these folders are called java.
Cheers
Philippe
---
Hmm, just because you start something you have to maintain it the rest
of the life? OMG :(
2009/4/2 Martijn Dashorst :
> I won't be... then I have to maintain the wicket-eclipse-maven plugin.
>
> Martijn
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 4:26 PM, nino martinez wael
> wrote:
>> copy code from the eclipse
does it add excludes to the source folder settings?
-igor
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:27 AM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> Some brilliant guy thought it prudent to make the maven-eclipse-plugin
> only accept .java files from src/main/java and src/test/java in
> version 2.6.
>
> Do not upgrade to this m
I won't be... then I have to maintain the wicket-eclipse-maven plugin.
Martijn
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 4:26 PM, nino martinez wael
wrote:
> copy code from the eclipse plugin to wicket eclipse plugin.. And
> everybodys happy :)
>
> 2009/4/2 Martijn Dashorst :
>> Why fix something that isn't broken
copy code from the eclipse plugin to wicket eclipse plugin.. And
everybodys happy :)
2009/4/2 Martijn Dashorst :
> Why fix something that isn't broken?
>
> Martijn
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Brill Pappin wrote:
>> That code is open... why not make a wicket-eclipse-plugin that puts the
>>
Why fix something that isn't broken?
Martijn
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Brill Pappin wrote:
> That code is open... why not make a wicket-eclipse-plugin that puts the
> files were you want them?
>
> - Brill Pappin
>
> On 2-Apr-09, at 6:27 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>
>> Some brilliant guy t
That code is open... why not make a wicket-eclipse-plugin that puts
the files were you want them?
- Brill Pappin
On 2-Apr-09, at 6:27 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Some brilliant guy thought it prudent to make the maven-eclipse-plugin
only accept .java files from src/main/java and src/test/jav
Some brilliant guy thought it prudent to make the maven-eclipse-plugin
only accept .java files from src/main/java and src/test/java in
version 2.6.
Do not upgrade to this maven-eclipse-plugin version if you intend to
keep on working with your wicket projects in the way Wicket Intended.
Always spe
32 matches
Mail list logo