Re: what is Wicket 2.x?
Martijn Dashorst wrote: On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Joachim Schrod jsch...@acm.org wrote: I'd like to add my voice to Martijn's comment that there are still people out there who have no choice but to use 1.4. Typically guys who have to support Wicket apps on app servers with no servlet-2.5-api. I'm not 100% sure, but did you try running a newer wicket (1.5) on ye old container? Actually, no. The relase notes said you need to have servlet api 2.5 and I believed them. Joachim -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Joachim Schrod, Roedermark, Germany Email: jsch...@acm.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: what is Wicket 2.x?
We are using Wicket 6 .0 on OC4j 10.1.3.5. This is a Servlet 2.4 container with support of some Servlet api 2.5 features. Work well here. The quickstart application works on OC4J ( http://wicket.apache.org/start/quickstart.html). (some slight modification is needed when using Wicket via a web.xml Filter). If you are familiar with Maven, using the quickstart archetype it is quite easy to give it a try :). 2012/12/11 Joachim Schrod jsch...@acm.org Martijn Dashorst wrote: On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Joachim Schrod jsch...@acm.org wrote: I'd like to add my voice to Martijn's comment that there are still people out there who have no choice but to use 1.4. Typically guys who have to support Wicket apps on app servers with no servlet-2.5-api. I'm not 100% sure, but did you try running a newer wicket (1.5) on ye old container? Actually, no. The relase notes said you need to have servlet api 2.5 and I believed them. Joachim -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Joachim Schrod, Roedermark, Germany Email: jsch...@acm.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, Kees van Dieren Squins | IT, Honestly Oranjestraat 23 2983 HL Ridderkerk The Netherlands Mobile: +31 (0)6 30413841 www.squins.com http://twitter.com/keesvandieren Chamber of commerce Rotterdam: 24435130 Boeken voor school en werk bestel je op studieboekencenter.nl
Re: what is Wicket 2.x?
Hi, everyone can edit the wiki pages. All you need is to create an account. Additionally I think that everything that is related to Wicket 1.4 and less should be removed from the Wiki. On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Lucio Crusca lu...@sulweb.org wrote: In data venerdì 7 dicembre 2012 20:06:45, Jeremy Thomerson ha scritto: Yep. There was a big change to constructors IIRC, although I can't remember exactly what the change was. Next came 1.3.0 with generics. Can I (we, you, ...) edit that sentence from the wiki pages then? It's confusing for newcomers like me. Does the IModel interface work as described in that page also in 6.x, except for generics? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/
Re: what is Wicket 2.x?
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: everyone can edit the wiki pages. All you need is to create an account. Additionally I think that everything that is related to Wicket 1.4 and less should be removed from the Wiki. Funny, I just gave a presentation to a institution that still runs Wicket 1.4 applications and can only upgrade next year to a more recent version (6) I think we probably should compartmentalize the various pages better (tagging?) so information about 1.4 is easier to detect. Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: what is Wicket 2.x?
Martin Grigorov wrote: Additionally I think that everything that is related to Wicket 1.4 and less should be removed from the Wiki. I'd like to add my voice to Martijn's comment that there are still people out there who have no choice but to use 1.4. Typically guys who have to support Wicket apps on app servers with no servlet-2.5-api. I'm one of them. :-( Next year, upgrade to JBoss 7 and thus Wicket 6 is hopefully possible. Joachim -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Joachim Schrod, Roedermark, Germany Email: jsch...@acm.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: what is Wicket 2.x?
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Joachim Schrod jsch...@acm.org wrote: I'd like to add my voice to Martijn's comment that there are still people out there who have no choice but to use 1.4. Typically guys who have to support Wicket apps on app servers with no servlet-2.5-api. I'm not 100% sure, but did you try running a newer wicket (1.5) on ye old container? I guess it should not be too difficult of fixing 1.5 to actually run on a 2.4 servlet api. At least Wicket 1.5.10-SNAPSHOT builds when I modify the servlet API dependency to 2.4 (no compilation nor unit test failures) Wicket 6 also requires Java 6, which might pose bigger problems. I'm one of them. :-( Next year, upgrade to JBoss 7 and thus Wicket 6 is hopefully possible. I hope so too. Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: what is Wicket 2.x?
Instead of adding components to their parents, you provide a child with their parent at construction time. The idea was that it would help in parsing, component construction and better feedback when creating pages. The burden it imposed outweighed the benefits be a great margin. Martijn On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com wrote: Yep. There was a big change to constructors IIRC, although I can't remember exactly what the change was. Next came 1.3.0 with generics. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://wickettraining.com *Need a CMS for Wicket? Use Brix! http://brixcms.org* On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Pierre Goupil goupilpie...@gmail.comwrote: Good evening, It's an old experiment which was due to go to ready for prime-time but never succeeded. If I remember correctly, it was before what became Wicket 1.3. Regards, Pierre On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Lucio Crusca lu...@sulweb.org wrote: Hello *, while reading this page https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/working-with-wicket-models.html I stumbled upon the following sentence: «NOTE: this page is about models like they exist for Wicket 1.x. The IModel interface is slightly changed in Wicket 2.x» What version of Wicket is 2.x? I'm aware of 1.x and 6.x, but never heard about 2.x... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Le bonheur n'est pas une destination, mais une façon de voyager. Papa d'une petite Lou-Ann depuis le 30 juin. -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: what is Wicket 2.x?
In data venerdì 7 dicembre 2012 20:06:45, Jeremy Thomerson ha scritto: Yep. There was a big change to constructors IIRC, although I can't remember exactly what the change was. Next came 1.3.0 with generics. Can I (we, you, ...) edit that sentence from the wiki pages then? It's confusing for newcomers like me. Does the IModel interface work as described in that page also in 6.x, except for generics? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
what is Wicket 2.x?
Hello *, while reading this page https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/working-with-wicket-models.html I stumbled upon the following sentence: «NOTE: this page is about models like they exist for Wicket 1.x. The IModel interface is slightly changed in Wicket 2.x» What version of Wicket is 2.x? I'm aware of 1.x and 6.x, but never heard about 2.x... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: what is Wicket 2.x?
Good evening, It's an old experiment which was due to go to ready for prime-time but never succeeded. If I remember correctly, it was before what became Wicket 1.3. Regards, Pierre On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Lucio Crusca lu...@sulweb.org wrote: Hello *, while reading this page https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/working-with-wicket-models.html I stumbled upon the following sentence: «NOTE: this page is about models like they exist for Wicket 1.x. The IModel interface is slightly changed in Wicket 2.x» What version of Wicket is 2.x? I'm aware of 1.x and 6.x, but never heard about 2.x... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Le bonheur n'est pas une destination, mais une façon de voyager. Papa d'une petite Lou-Ann depuis le 30 juin.
Re: what is Wicket 2.x?
Yep. There was a big change to constructors IIRC, although I can't remember exactly what the change was. Next came 1.3.0 with generics. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://wickettraining.com *Need a CMS for Wicket? Use Brix! http://brixcms.org* On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Pierre Goupil goupilpie...@gmail.comwrote: Good evening, It's an old experiment which was due to go to ready for prime-time but never succeeded. If I remember correctly, it was before what became Wicket 1.3. Regards, Pierre On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Lucio Crusca lu...@sulweb.org wrote: Hello *, while reading this page https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/working-with-wicket-models.html I stumbled upon the following sentence: «NOTE: this page is about models like they exist for Wicket 1.x. The IModel interface is slightly changed in Wicket 2.x» What version of Wicket is 2.x? I'm aware of 1.x and 6.x, but never heard about 2.x... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Le bonheur n'est pas une destination, mais une façon de voyager. Papa d'une petite Lou-Ann depuis le 30 juin.
