Re: wicket + sso (jCIFS)

2008-10-16 Thread Jan Kriesten
Hi James, > I think it's the order they are mapped in the web.xml file. The > declaration order doesn't decide what goes first/last. Basically, the > elements decide the order. right, but I used the word 'filter' not as a synonym for the xml-tags but the application of the filter definition.

Re: wicket + sso (jCIFS)

2008-10-16 Thread James Carman
I think it's the order they are mapped in the web.xml file. The declaration order doesn't decide what goes first/last. Basically, the elements decide the order. On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Jan Kriesten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > filters are applied in order of their appearence

Re: wicket + sso (jCIFS)

2008-10-16 Thread lienok
Hi Jan, thank you a lot, not just it's working but I understand to filters a bit more =) kind regards, lenka Jan Kriesten wrote: > > > Hi, > > filters are applied in order of their appearence in the web.xml - so when > your > wicket-filter is applied, there hasn't any authentication been >

Re: wicket + sso (jCIFS)

2008-10-16 Thread Jan Kriesten
Hi, filters are applied in order of their appearence in the web.xml - so when your wicket-filter is applied, there hasn't any authentication been performed... Best regards, --- Jan. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

wicket + sso (jCIFS)

2008-10-16 Thread lienok
Hi, I have a follow problem. I would like to use jCIFS authetication with wicket. I have all necessary configuration in web.xml. WicketApplication /* NTLMFilter jcifs.http.NtlmHttpFilter jcifs.http.domainController