Re: wicket osgi (not Pax)

2010-10-12 Thread kugaprakash
for such architechture? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-osgi-not-Pax-tp1893713p2991185.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr

Re: wicket osgi (not Pax)

2010-10-12 Thread David Leangen
you recommend Pax Wicket for such architechture? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-osgi-not-Pax-tp1893713p2991185.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: wicket osgi (not Pax)

2010-01-29 Thread Eelco Hillenius
In any case, this is getting REALLY off topic... ;-) On the contrary; this is really helpful for OSGi n00bs like me. Thanks for replying everyone. Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For

Re: wicket osgi (not Pax)

2010-01-28 Thread Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
Hi David, Antilia simply use equinox extensions for class-loading that way you can use normal Wicket components... No need to modify Wicket or your components. There I just create the extensions points I need to allow extending components at some places (e.g. toolbars). The projects I mentioned

Re: wicket osgi (not Pax)

2010-01-28 Thread David Leangen
Hi Ernesto, Antilia simply use equinox extensions for class-loading that way you can use normal Wicket components... No need to modify Wicket or your components. Ok, do you mean buddy classloading? If so, that's not real OSGi. :-) What I wanted to says is that you not always have to face

Re: wicket osgi (not Pax)

2010-01-28 Thread Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
Yes I mean buddy class-loading. It might not be real OSGi but it works:-) as far as you only use equinox. I also do like a lot OSGi. But I know from experience that it might take some time for newbies to get the full grasp of it Cheers, Ernesto On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 9:47 AM, David

Re: wicket osgi (not Pax)

2010-01-28 Thread Jochen Mader
Buddy-class loading is real OSGi since 4.1 ;) The new MANIFEST.MF entry is named Bundle- *BuddyPolicy.* Cheers, Jochen On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro reier...@gmail.com wrote: Yes I mean buddy class-loading. It might not be real OSGi but it works:-) as far

Re: wicket osgi (not Pax)

2010-01-28 Thread David Leangen
Buddy-class loading is real OSGi since 4.1 ;) The new MANIFEST.MF entry is named Bundle- *BuddyPolicy.* Ok, thanks for letting me know. I haven't looked at 4.1 at all. I'll have to look into the buddy thing. I'm wondering if it was some kind of compromise for the Equinox people, or if there

Re: wicket osgi (not Pax)

2010-01-28 Thread Jochen Mader
I ran into a lot of use-cases for it. Just take a look at esper and drools. They are packaged as OSGi and need to be able to work with classes provided by people using them. But yes, we are getting a little off topic here :D

Re: wicket osgi (not Pax)

2010-01-28 Thread Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
I did not know about it being included on the standard... Thanks for the update. Ernesto On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Jochen Mader pflanzenmoer...@gmail.comwrote: Buddy-class loading is real OSGi since 4.1 ;) The new MANIFEST.MF entry is named Bundle- *BuddyPolicy.* Cheers, Jochen

Re: wicket osgi (not Pax)

2010-01-28 Thread Jan Juno
Thank you very much On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro reier...@gmail.com wrote: I did not know about it being included on the standard... Thanks for the update. Ernesto On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Jochen Mader pflanzenmoer...@gmail.com wrote:

wicket osgi (not Pax)

2010-01-27 Thread Jan Juno
Is there a How-to for OSGI and wicket, not from pax I managed to install jetty servlet api in equinox...now I have to install wicket somehow

Re: wicket osgi (not Pax)

2010-01-27 Thread David Leangen
Is there a How-to for OSGI and wicket, not from pax I managed to install jetty servlet api in equinox...now I have to install wicket somehow Good luck! Due to serialization issues, it's not an easy problem to solve. I don't know of any how-to. All I can say is that you have a long road

Re: wicket osgi (not Pax)

2010-01-27 Thread Eelco Hillenius
Is there a How-to for OSGI and wicket, not from pax I managed to install jetty servlet api in equinox...now I have to install wicket somehow Good luck! Due to serialization issues, it's not an easy problem to solve. I don't know of any how-to. All I can say is that you have a long road

Re: wicket osgi (not Pax)

2010-01-27 Thread David Leangen
Hi Eelco, Is there a How-to for OSGI and wicket, not from pax I managed to install jetty servlet api in equinox...now I have to install wicket somehow Good luck! Due to serialization issues, it's not an easy problem to solve. I don't know of any how-to. All I can say is that you have

Re: wicket osgi (not Pax)

2010-01-27 Thread Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
I have seen OSGi successfully used with Wicket on production environments... With no problems with the serialization issues you mentioned. Best, Ernesto On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:08 AM, David Leangen wic...@leangen.net wrote: Is there a How-to for OSGI and wicket, not from pax I managed

Re: wicket osgi (not Pax)

2010-01-27 Thread Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
Take a look at http://code.google.com/p/antilia/source/browse/#svn/com.antilia.wstarter http://code.google.com/p/antilia/source/browse/#svn/com.antilia.wstarter http://code.google.com/p/antilia/source/browse/#svn/com.antilia.wstarter.demo

Re: wicket osgi (not Pax)

2010-01-27 Thread David Leangen
I have seen OSGi successfully used with Wicket on production environments... With no problems with the serialization issues you mentioned. Yes, I am using pax-wicket for this. What I meant was--as I understood from the original post--the person wanted to use wicket in OSGi without using a