t; > www.brunoborges.com.br
> > +55 21 76727099
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Steve Swinsburg
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I don't use the library, I'm just converting a tool from 1.3 to 1.4 that
> >> someone els
>> I don't use the library, I'm just converting a tool from 1.3 to 1.4 that
>> someone else wrote. I have no idea how wicketstuff-dojo works.
>>
>> If Wicketstuff still used SVN I'd just merge it in and make sure it
>> compiled, but I have no experience i
And that's
why the project is disabled.
I'm sorry,
*Bruno Borges*
www.brunoborges.com.br
+55 21 76727099
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Steve Swinsburg
wrote:
> I don't use the library, I'm just converting a tool from 1.3 to 1.4 that
> someone else wrote. I hav
I don't use the library, I'm just converting a tool from 1.3 to 1.4 that
someone else wrote. I have no idea how wicketstuff-dojo works.
If Wicketstuff still used SVN I'd just merge it in and make sure it compiled,
but I have no experience in git and no time to learn a new source
;>> I found the old source. There is a LOT of stuff missing in the 1.4 release
>>> compared to the 1.3 release.
>>>
>>> 1.3:
>>>
>>> https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/attic/wicketstuff-dojo/src/main/java/org/wicketstuff/doj
Attila
>
> 2011/7/1 Steve Swinsburg
>
>> I found the old source. There is a LOT of stuff missing in the 1.4 release
>> compared to the 1.3 release.
>>
>> 1.3:
>>
>> https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/attic/wicketstu
.
Attila
2011/7/1 Steve Swinsburg
> I found the old source. There is a LOT of stuff missing in the 1.4 release
> compared to the 1.3 release.
>
> 1.3:
>
> https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/attic/wicketstuff-dojo/src/main/java/org/wicketstuff/dojo/ma
I found the old source. There is a LOT of stuff missing in the 1.4 release
compared to the 1.3 release.
1.3:
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/attic/wicketstuff-dojo/src/main/java/org/wicketstuff/dojo/markup/html/
1.4:
https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/tree/master
Hi,
Does anyone know what the status of wicketstuff dojo is?
I have an application that was written in Wicket 1.3 which I have converted to
1.4, likewise for dojo. However there are classes missing from the 1.4 release
that were being used in the 1.3 release, specifically
Hi Mike,
The only example application I know is at
http://www.molindo.at/files/wicketstuff-dojo-1.1-test.tar.gz
It is linked at
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/wicketstuff-dojo-1.1
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Michael O'Cleirigh <
michael.ocleir...@rivulet.c
Hello,
In wicket 1.3.x there was a fairly comprehensive dojo integration. The
examples are still visible on the wicketstuff.org site.
At some point the wicketstuff-dojo and wicketstuff-dojo-examples were
archived into the attic in svn. This version used dojo version 0.4
Later there was a
I am trying to use wicketstuyff.dojo , I saw the version available is 1.3
and it does not work with wicket 1.4.12 , please tell me if there is any
wicketstuff-dojo compatible with wicket 1.4.12 ?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicketstuff-dojo
Thanks a lot Jeremy.
Josh
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Thomerson [mailto:jer...@wickettraining.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 12:10 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: WicketStuff Dojo
You're added
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, M
You're added
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Josh Chappelle wrote:
> jchappelle
My sf.net user id is jchappelle.
Josh
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Thomerson [mailto:jer...@wickettraining.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 11:55 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: WicketStuff Dojo
Register on their site.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http
gt; From: Jeremy Thomerson [mailto:jer...@wickettraining.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 11:48 AM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: WicketStuff Dojo
>
> Are you a committer in wicket-stuff? If not, provide your sf.net user ID
> and we can add you.
>
> --
> Jeremy
I am not. In fact I don't have a sf.net user id. How should I go about
getting one?
Josh
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Thomerson [mailto:jer...@wickettraining.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 11:48 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: WicketStuff Dojo
Are you a comm
Are you a committer in wicket-stuff? If not, provide your sf.net user ID
and we can add you.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Josh Chappelle wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Is anyone maintaining the wicketstuff-dojo project anymore? If n
Hi,
Is anyone maintaining the wicketstuff-dojo project anymore? If not then I
can get the source code and try to get it working in 1.4 and commit the
changes.
If this is not the forum for wicket-stuff questions I apologize and please
let me know where one is.
Thanks,
Josh
ode url is :
> https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-dojo-1.1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
I find lastest code url is :
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-dojo-1.1
I have same problem.
my project has used wicketstuff-dojo component, now I want to upgrade wicket
from 1.3.7 to 1.4.1, all test well but wicketstuff-dojo's component throw
exception.
do wicketstuff-dojo project stop develop?
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 14:22, Elena Stoll wrote:
> Hi,
&g
Hi,
I have a question:
Is there a new version of wicketstuff-dojo, which is compatible with the
Wicket 1.4 version.
If so, where to find it.
Thanks in advance.
Elena
It seems this is the latest:
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-dojo-1.1/
wicket 1.3.6
dojo 1.1
El lun, 21-09-2009 a las 09:54 +0200, Elena Stoll escribió:
> Hi,
> ask the question:
> Is there a new version of wicketstuff-dojo, which is c
Hi,
ask the question:
Is there a new version of wicketstuff-dojo, which is compatible with the
Wicket 1.4 version.
Thanks in advance.
Elena
Hi,
ask the question:
Is there a new version of wicketstuff-dojo, which is compatible with the
Wicket 1.4 version.
Thanks in advance.
Elena
Hi, I will be compiling wicketstuff-dojo with a dependency on wicket
1.3.4 for an internal project. Does anyone know if there are any
integration issues between those two versions?
Alternatively, is there a better component to use for a
floating div than DojoFloatingPane? I did notice that
It's moved to the 1.3.X branch because it wasn't 1.4 compatible:
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/branches/wicket-1.3.x/wicketstuff-dojo-examples/
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:15 AM, lizz wrote:
>
>
I dont find the source code for the example there...
I am looking for the complete source code for the
"Orderable List with scroll" example...
Dipu-3 wrote:
>
> i think its in there
> https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-dojo-1.1
i think its in there
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-dojo-1.1
regards
dipu
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 2:58 PM, lizz wrote:
>
> I dont find the source code at
> https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wickets
I dont find the source code at
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-dojo-examples
anymore.
Where can I find the source for the wicketstuff/dojo examples now?
Stefan Lindner wrote:
>
> Where can I find the source for the wicketstuff/dojo examples
rs
Betreff: Re: AW: Wicket 1.4 and Wicketstuff/Dojo/DragAndDrop
Wichtigkeit: Hoch
Hi Stefan,
Op vrijdag 25-04-2008 om 18:03 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Stefan Lindner:
> To all the other WicketStuff Dojo users: I have successfully built a
> version for current wicket 1.4 trunk. If someone
Hi Stefan,
Op vrijdag 25-04-2008 om 18:03 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Stefan Lindner:
> To all the other WicketStuff Dojo users: I have successfully built a
> version for current wicket 1.4 trunk. If someone nedds it, please let
> me know!
Actually I'm trying to get it for wic
Op maandag 28-04-2008 om 14:18 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Arthur
Bogaart:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> I presume this build is based on the 'old' dojo-0.4 version? If so,
> are there any plans in updating the wicketstuff-dojo project to
> dojo-1.1.0 or is there to much resistan
quot;child" in "wicket.widget" registered to namespace
"wicket"
DEBUG: DEPRECATED: dojo.widget.Manager.getImplementationName Could not
locate widget implementation for "extend" in "wicket.widget" registered
to
namespace "wicket". Developers mus
pace
>> "wicket"
>> DEBUG: DEPRECATED: dojo.widget.Manager.getImplementationName Could not
>> locate widget implementation for "child" in "wicket.widget" registered to
>> namespace "wicket". Developers must specify correct namespaces for all
&g
I'm following the simple Dojo D'n'D example
(http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Simple+Dojo+D%27n%27D+tutorial)
and I've set up a list of labels rather than images. It looks like I
can only drop in between stuff. How would I be able to tell if you're
actually trying to drop *onto
has anybody worked on Wicket Dojo Tooltip?
-Original Message-
From: Patel, Sanjay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 10:57 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: WicketStuff Dojo Tooltip - Question
I used WicketStuff Dojo Tooltip in my one page and it works fine
I used WicketStuff Dojo Tooltip in my one page and it works fine. Right
now the tooltip displays on mouseover event. Is there anyway I can
display it on onClick event?
On my other page I have a link which I am hiding/showing through ajax
update (target.addComponent(..)) based on some condition
All,
Is there a wicketstuff-dojo project that is based off of dojo 1.1? The
only one I could find was based off of dojo 0.4.
Thanks,
Jason
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
r contribution of libraries did not
> work. I hat a similar problem with WicketStuff Dojo.
>
> Stefan
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Stefan Lindner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. April 2008 17:01
> An: users@wicket.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Wicke
Now it works but I had to specify the javacript libraries explicit in the
header section. The auto generated header contribution of libraries did not
work. I hat a similar problem with WicketStuff Dojo.
Stefan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Stefan Lindner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
d the thin.
Stefan.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Ryan Sonnek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 28. April 2008 14:55
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Wicket 1.4 and Wicketstuff/Dojo/DragAndDrop
Wichtigkeit: Hoch
i'll try to create a 1.4 branch of the scriptaculous p
I had using
the Dojo component within an inmethod.grid component) I will adjust my
respond() method accordingly. I just wanted to toss out that problem with
SuggestionList so that it can be corrected in the library.
Chuck Deal
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-wicketstuff
y: Where can I find the source (subversion
> > repository)? It's not on sourceforge.
> > >
> > > Kind Regards
> > > Stefan
> > >
> > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> > > Von: Maurice Marrink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
4 and Wicketstuff/Dojo/DragAndDrop
i'll try to create a 1.4 branch of the scriptaculous project sometime this
week. of course patches are always welcome. =)
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 7:20 AM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The source is located at sourceforg
pository)? It's not on sourceforge.
> >
> > Kind Regards
> > Stefan
> >
> > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: Maurice Marrink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Gesendet: Freitag, 25. April 2008 16:03
> >
> > An: users@wicket.ap
sion repository)?
> It's not on sourceforge.
>
> Kind Regards
> Stefan
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Maurice Marrink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 25. April 2008 16:03
>
> An: users@wicket.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Wicket 1.4
Hi Stefan,
I presume this build is based on the 'old' dojo-0.4 version? If so, are there
any plans in updating the wicketstuff-dojo project to dojo-1.1.0 or is there to
much resistance since Dojo has changed it's api already a couple of times?
Regards,
Arthur Bogaart
[
k [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 25. April 2008 16:03
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Wicket 1.4 and Wicketstuff/Dojo/DragAndDrop
Wichtigkeit: Hoch
snapshots should be available, And i think a 1.4-m1 should be available any
time soon too.
Maurice
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3
PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 25. April 2008 19:24
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Wicket 1.4 and Wicketstuff/Dojo/DragAndDrop
Stefan Lindner wrote:
> Thank you Ryan,
>
> nice to hear that some WicketStuff projects are still alive. On question
> about Scriptaculous drag
target is the underlying drop container (means drop an element onto
another to replace it)?
To all the other WicketStuff Dojo users: I have successfully built a version
for current wicket 1.4 trunk. If someone nedds it, please let me know!
Commit it to wicketstuff? You mean you ported the
possible to move
> another element onto the drag element and the target is the underlying drop
> container (means drop an element onto another to replace it)?
>
> To all the other WicketStuff Dojo users: I have successfully built a
> version for current wicket 1.4 trunk. If someone n
drop container (means
drop an element onto another to replace it)?
To all the other WicketStuff Dojo users: I have successfully built a version
for current wicket 1.4 trunk. If someone nedds it, please let me know!
Stefan Lindner
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Ryan Sonnek [mailto:[EMAIL
> deals with drag and drop for wicket? Are there other users of wicketstuff
> > dojo out there, who want to migrate to wicket 1.4? Does it still make sense
> > to investigate in wicketstuff/doho? Are there commercial solutions fprt
> drag
> > and drop?
> >
> &
ay ma hands on it: Is there another LIVING project, that
> deals with drag and drop for wicket? Are there other users of wicketstuff
> dojo out there, who want to migrate to wicket 1.4? Does it still make sense
> to investigate in wicketstuff/doho? Are there commercial solutions fprt drag
Ok, before I lay ma hands on it: Is there another LIVING project, that deals
with drag and drop for wicket? Are there other users of wicketstuff dojo out
there, who want to migrate to wicket 1.4? Does it still make sense to
investigate in wicketstuff/doho? Are there commercial solutions fprt
all of the mentioned project maintainers have been away for some time now.
you might need to lay your own hands on it.
i would guess nobody objects to such efforts.
Gerolf
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Stefan Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a Wicketstuff/dojo ver
Is there a Wicketstuff/dojo version that works together with Wicket 1.4?
Is Wicketstuff/Dojo still alive? The latest news on the webpage state
that Wicketstuff/Dojo is still based upon wicket 1.3 beta.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e
Thank you Maurice!
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Maurice Marrink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. März 2008 17:39
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Wicketstuff/dojo Examples
Try
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff
Try
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-dojo-examples
Maurice
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Stefan Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where can I find the source for the wicketstuff/dojo examples? I do not
> mean the code snipplets l
Where can I find the source for the wicketstuff/dojo examples? I do not
mean the code snipplets like the ones at
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Simple+Dojo+D%27n%27
D+tutorial?
The repositories that are mentiones all around the page contain only
source for the wicket-doje
plementation for "child" in "wicket.widget" registered to namespace
> "wicket"
> DEBUG: DEPRECATED: dojo.widget.Manager.getImplementationName Could not
> locate widget implementation for "extend" in "wicket.widget" registered to
> name
on for "child" in "wicket.widget" registered to namespace
"wicket"
DEBUG: DEPRECATED: dojo.widget.Manager.getImplementationName Could not
locate widget implementation for "extend" in "wicket.widget" registered to
namespace "wicket". Develop
ojo bundled in
with wicketstuff-dojo. While Dojo was dysfunctional in the
application, the security warning didn't pop up where it
used to be, so it seems likely that our problem is really
caused by the Dojo 0.4 bug.
> If you can find out the patch we can apply it on the current dojo use
Timo Rantalaiho wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
Hi Timo
> We run into the good old "this page contains both secure and
> non-secure items" warning on IE 6 when updating
> DojoOrderableListContainer components via Ajax.
>
> We're using Dojo packaged with the w
Hello,
We run into the good old "this page contains both secure and
non-secure items" warning on IE 6 when updating
DojoOrderableListContainer components via Ajax.
We're using Dojo packaged with the wicketstuff-dojo
1.3.0-SNAPSHOT, and I understand that it's version 0.4.
Hi,
I'll try to have a look to that ASAP, could you please open an issue for
that : http://wicketstuff.org/jira
Cheers,
--
Vincent
Thies Edeling wrote:
Using the DojoDatePicker widget from wicketstuff-dojo (1.3.0-beta)
gives a dojo warning:
DEBUG: DEPRE
* Kirk Israel:
> Q. a. Why isn't this stuff documented in more depth? b. And why don't
> people answer every stupid little question I have.
> A. a. Wicketstuff-Dojo is still a fairly young project with people who
> are currently more into coding it for more functional
Using the DojoDatePicker widget from wicketstuff-dojo (1.3.0-beta) gives
a dojo warning:
DEBUG: DEPRECATED: dojo.widget.Manager.getImplementationName Could not
locate widget implementation for "simpledropdowndatepicker" in
"dojo.widget" registered to namespace "dojo&
Good, because my group was beyond the point where "Setting up a Wicket
project" was useful... and if we don't know "What is Wicket?" by now
there's no hope for us :-)
Strongly mixed feelings about the delay... I can see the appeal of
having it as up to date as possible, but I'm hankering for
docu
> It's too bad Wicket in Action has been so delayed. The environment is
> rich enough to deserve an alternate viewpoint!
http://manning.com/dashorst/ available in MEAP now, this week we'll
hopefully put out two more chapters! :)
It's actually good it is delayed imho. Not for me personally, but th
d by developers that are not
> > core
> > > developers. so it is really up to those developers to monitor this list
> > and
> > > answer questions.
> >
> > Ok. But most side projects (includ
hat dojo stuff is a
> > wicket-stuff project. created and maintained by developers that are not
> core
> > developers. so it is really up to those developers to monitor this list
> and
> > answer questions.
>
> Ok. But most side projects (including Wicketstuff/Wicketstuff-D
it is really up to those developers to monitor this list and
> answer questions.
Ok. But most side projects (including Wicketstuff/Wicketstuff-Dojo)
haven't forked their own mailing lists or discussion groups, true?
Nothing leapt out after
> Q. a. Why isn't this stuff documented in more depth? b. And why don't
> people answer every stupid little question I have.
> A. a. Wicketstuff-Dojo is still a fairly young project with people who
> are currently more into coding it for more functionality than
> docu
On 8/8/07, Kirk Israel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm getting the feeling this list doesn't have a ton of patience for
> questions it considers dumb. (or related to a library rather than core
> wicket) So with the idea that I might have asked a few dumb things,
> and to show that I'm trying to
> I'm getting the feeling this list doesn't have a ton of patience for
> questions it considers dumb.
I think it's more a matter of us being incredibly busy :)
Eelco
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional com
o
give my answers to the questions I do have:
Q. Can I attach the same wicketstuff-dojo DojoMenu to multiple components?
A. No. Although some Wicket behaviors can be attached to multiple
compontents, DojoContextualMenuBehavior requires each element get its
own DojoMenu.
Q. How do I modify the colo
I just discovered the jdocs for Wicket
http://www.jdocs.com/tab/91/overview-summary.html
Are there any other good, comprehensive references I should know about?
And is there a better forum for than this list for Wicketstuff-Dojo
related questions?
Specifically, I'm wondering about how to a
80 matches
Mail list logo
