* Kirk Israel:
> Q. a. Why isn't this stuff documented in more depth? b. And why don't
> people answer every stupid little question I have.
> A. a. Wicketstuff-Dojo is still a fairly young project with people who
> are currently more into coding it for more functionality than
> documenting. You'r
Good, because my group was beyond the point where "Setting up a Wicket
project" was useful... and if we don't know "What is Wicket?" by now
there's no hope for us :-)
Strongly mixed feelings about the delay... I can see the appeal of
having it as up to date as possible, but I'm hankering for
docu
> It's too bad Wicket in Action has been so delayed. The environment is
> rich enough to deserve an alternate viewpoint!
http://manning.com/dashorst/ available in MEAP now, this week we'll
hopefully put out two more chapters! :)
It's actually good it is delayed imho. Not for me personally, but th
Heh, sorry, I didn't mean for the "true?" to sound as whiny as it did
-- just my ongoing fear, or hope, that there's some treasure trove of
documentation and developers just WAITING to answer my every question,
and I just haven't found it yet.
It's too bad Wicket in Action has been so delayed. The
no they havent. i am not saying that this isnt the place to ask questions, i
am saying dont expect to receive the same quality of service as you receive
when asking questions about the core projects. also not that not everyone on
this list uses that wicket-stuff project, so probably most people kno
On 8/8/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/8/07, Kirk Israel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> not the case. what you have to understand is that dojo stuff is a
> wicket-stuff project. created and maintained by developers that are not core
> developers. so it is really up to those develo
> Q. a. Why isn't this stuff documented in more depth? b. And why don't
> people answer every stupid little question I have.
> A. a. Wicketstuff-Dojo is still a fairly young project with people who
> are currently more into coding it for more functionality than
> documenting. You're certainly welc
On 8/8/07, Kirk Israel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm getting the feeling this list doesn't have a ton of patience for
> questions it considers dumb. (or related to a library rather than core
> wicket) So with the idea that I might have asked a few dumb things,
> and to show that I'm trying to
> I'm getting the feeling this list doesn't have a ton of patience for
> questions it considers dumb.
I think it's more a matter of us being incredibly busy :)
Eelco
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional com
I'm getting the feeling this list doesn't have a ton of patience for
questions it considers dumb. (or related to a library rather than core
wicket) So with the idea that I might have asked a few dumb things,
and to show that I'm trying to resolve things on my own, I'm going to
give my answers to th
10 matches
Mail list logo
