Re: xmlschema help

2010-11-17 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Sandy, you might have a look at JaxMeXS http://ws.apache.org/jaxme/xs/index.html > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Mustard, Sandy > wrote: >> Benson, >> >> >> >> Sorry to trouble you.  I have looked at the xmlschema project and was >> wondering if there is a simple way to have it do what I ne

Re: Error using xml-rpc

2011-01-05 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
That looks like the server were producing an invalid response, in the style of Client On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:52 PM, mith86 wrote: > > Hi, I'm trying to connect a java client with a perl server using xml-rpc .. > I'm using the code provided at this link - > http://www.javaworld.com/javaworl

Re: XmlObject parameter to XmlRPC call

2011-03-08 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
You don't mention what underlying technology you are using? XmlRpcServlet? Native Webserver? What else? Best would be to publish your initialization code completely. On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Philippe Langevin wrote: > Hi, > > > > I’m trying to pass an org.apache.xmlbeans.XmlObject as a p

Re: Dynamic proxies tech can't be used when using TimingOutCallback?

2011-04-25 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Patches welcome. :-) On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 6:02 AM, fxbird wrote: > Hi all: I discovered if I use TimingOutCallback to set timeout value there's > no way to use dynamic proxies, the TimingOutCallback.executeAsync parameters > does not offer such way, only default way that needs qualified class

Re: Can I ask you a xml rpc question>?

2011-04-25 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Server side: Use a properly configured web server like Apache Tomcat, or Jetty. More than sufficient material available on configuring these for SSL. Client side: See http://ws.apache.org/xmlrpc/ssl.html 2011/4/25 Kurt Xu : > Hi there: >   I got your mail on apache xml-rpc website. I wrote the ma

Re: Can I ask you a xml rpc question>?

2011-04-27 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
e and generate proper certificate ,something like that? > >   Thanks > > Kurt > > On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 17:50:20 +0800, Jochen Wiedmann > wrote: > >> Server side: Use a properly configured web server like Apache Tomcat, >> or Jetty. More than sufficient material a

Re: AUTO: Julianne Bielski/Raleigh/IBM is out of the office. (returning 09/28/2011)

2011-09-20 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Is this a relative of Julia Antnova? Jochen http://docs.codehaus.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=160694277 On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Julianne Bielski wrote: > I am out of the office until 09/28/2011. > > I will not be checking email. > > > Note: This is an automated response to your mes

Re: RPC between xml-rpc c/c++ and js?

2012-12-20 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
According to http://phpxmlrpc.sourceforge.net/jsxmlrpc/ jsxml-rpc implements the original specification for XML-RPC, as available from http://www.xmlrpc.com/ If so, it should be compatible with any server side implementation of that spec, including Apache XML-RPC. Jochen

Re: RPC between xml-rpc c/c++ and js?

2013-01-09 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
I am unaware of any restrictions. Please enlighten me! Thanks, Jochen On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 3:20 PM, john wrote: > Jochen, > > The understa nding is that cross domain access resists such > method. Say, within the reliable network (LAN), how far it is possible > to implement rpc without the r

Re: generate String data type for dateTime.iso8601 rather than a date

2013-12-01 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
See http://ws.apache.org/xmlrpc/advanced.html section on "Custom data types". On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 5:08 PM, zeyad farouk wrote: > Hello gurus, > how can we generate a string data type for dateTime.iso8601 rather than > date data type ? or how to enforce the library to return the exact XML

Re: generate String data type for dateTime.iso8601 rather than a date

2013-12-02 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
ime.iso8601 value as a string at the client > side (actually we don't have control over the server side). > Could you please help with an example on how to override the default > package implementation and read the dateTime.iso8601 as string rather than > a date. > > Thanks so