On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Thomas Mortagne
thomas.morta...@xwiki.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 9:35 PM, Matthias Wegner mic.mat.weg...@web.de wrote:
Hi All,
i just uploaded a new extension to
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/TaskMacro.
I want to enable in
On 01/08/2015 04:52 PM, Jason Clemons wrote:
Hello all,
I've implemented some client side page validation using JavaScript which
works well, but I want to implement some simple checks on server side also.
I know how to evaluate the values in my UI using velocity after the page is
Then I don't really understand the question.
This code does not work ? You want to know how to do the same thing in Java ?
You can access the current XWikiContext by injecting in your macro
component and then you have pretty much the same API than in the
script oriented one, something like
The description is not helping much knowing what this is about,
myxwiki.org is dedicated to non-profit organizations and
individuals.
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 4:15 AM, drew drew.duckwo...@gmail.com wrote:
subject: [myxwiki] new wiki request
description: replace XWiki Cloud account
owner name:
When saving an attachment XWikiAttachment.updateContentArchive produce
a base 64 String of the attachment (so a lot bigger than the
attachment size) before copy it again as String[] (so again double the
size in memory) and then sending it to the database (which is not
quite the streamed thing you
Thomas,
I believe I am using the filesystem attachment. At least that's when I thought
when using the following configuration:
# enable attachment filesystem storage
xwiki.store.attachment.hint=file
xwiki.store.attachment.versioning.hint=file
Well that stack trace don't look like filesystem attachment storage
stack trace. Attachment archives are handled by ListAttachmentArchive
so we should have seen a ListAttachmentArchive#updateArchive call
instead of the
XWikiAttachment.updateContentArchive call.
I agree that your configuration
The error makes it look like FSAttach is disabled.
Check for files existing in the Permanent Storage directory in the server's
filesystem.
Thanks,
Caleb
On 01/12/2015 10:05 AM, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
Thomas,
I believe I am using the filesystem attachment. At least that's when I
thought
