Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] [Idea] Make Markdown syntax available as an optional subset of the XWiki 2.1 syntax

That’ s not possible. There’s no Markdown standard. It’s been discussed at length with its creator and he explicitly said he didn’t want a standard. There were big fights over the internet on this topic :) Would need to find the thread. I read it a while ago. Thanks -Vincent On 27 Nov 2015

Re: [xwiki-users] CORS and headers

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Anton Hughes wrote: > Hello > > I am trying to use XWiki in a CORS fashion, that is, a javascript client > calls pages in xwiki. > > This sometimes works, but I notice sometimes it doesnt. I havent found the > reason why it doesnt always work.

Re: [xwiki-users] CORS and headers

On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea < mariusdumitru.flo...@xwiki.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Anton Hughes wrote: > >> Hello >> >> I am trying to use XWiki in a CORS fashion, that is, a javascript client >> calls pages in xwiki. >> >> This

Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] [Idea] Make Markdown syntax available as an optional subset of the XWiki 2.1 syntax

I'm trying to find something that looks like a standard. Paul vinc...@massol.net wrote: > Can you explain why you’re trying to do something that’s already > implemented? You don’t like our current implementation? ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org

Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] [Idea] Make Markdown syntax available as an optional subset of the XWiki 2.1 syntax

The point is not to use someone else's code or even to duplicate the logic to a perfect binary-compatible tee, the point is to be "standard enough" that it's familiar to people who come in from Github, StackOverflow, Slack, Reddit etc. The php-inspired macro idea is another attempt at making it

Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] [Idea] Make Markdown syntax available as an optional subset of the XWiki 2.1 syntax

On 27 Nov 2015 at 16:41:34, Paul Libbrecht (p...@hoplahup.net(mailto:p...@hoplahup.net)) wrote: > > > Caleb James DeLisle wrote: > > I had just imagined an extension to the markdown standard, not sure > > exactly > > how macros ought to be implemented... One possibility: > > > > > >

Re: [xwiki-users] Request: make linking easy

Hi Anton, On 26 Nov 2015 at 20:44:35, Anton Hughes (a...@tradeworks.io(mailto:a...@tradeworks.io)) wrote: > > On 26 November 2015 at 20:33, vinc...@massol.net(mailto:vinc...@massol.net) > wrote: > > It works. Create a page with [[test]]. You’ll see a question mark (wanted > > link). Click

Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] [Idea] Make Markdown syntax available as an optional subset of the XWiki 2.1 syntax

I had just imagined an extension to the markdown standard, not sure exactly how macros ought to be implemented... One possibility: or ?> Thanks, Caleb On 27/11/15 14:28, Paul Libbrecht wrote: I'm trying to find "comparable tools" that we could document there as being comparable

Re: [xwiki-users] What is the XWiki equivalent of Mediawiki categories and embed?

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Anton Hughes wrote: > On 26 November 2015 at 19:38, vinc...@massol.net > wrote: > > > > > Give us the full name of your 2 pages and we can show you what to > use. > > > http://localhost:8080/xwiki/bin/view/test/ > > >

Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] [Idea] Make Markdown syntax available as an optional subset of the XWiki 2.1 syntax

I'm trying to find "comparable tools" that we could document there as being comparable experiences that users might have met already. I do not see any yet (Confluence and Jenkins seem to have pedgown as an option, that's the only similarity I find). So... this is "just another extended markdown" ?

Re: [xwiki-users] Request: make linking easy

Hi Anton, thanks for your feedback. As you noticed, XWiki is currently undergoing significant changes in the way we handle pages and all the associated kinks have not been worked out yet. If I may, one solution for you could be to switch back to XWiki Enterprise 7.1 for the moment, and upgrade at

Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] [Idea] Make Markdown syntax available as an optional subset of the XWiki 2.1 syntax

Caleb James DeLisle wrote: > I had just imagined an extension to the markdown standard, not sure > exactly > how macros ought to be implemented... One possibility: > >$doc.getFullName() > ?> > > or > > ?> Hey, that is very "standard" in the sense of PHP-ish. I like it but I am sure it can