The point is not to use someone else's code or even to duplicate
the logic to a perfect binary-compatible tee, the point is to be
"standard enough" that it's familiar to people who come in from
Github, StackOverflow, Slack, Reddit etc.
The php-inspired macro idea is another attempt at making it m
That’ s not possible.
There’s no Markdown standard. It’s been discussed at length with its creator
and he explicitly said he didn’t want a standard. There were big fights over
the internet on this topic :) Would need to find the thread. I read it a while
ago.
Thanks
-Vincent
On 27 Nov 2015 at
I'm trying to find something that looks like a standard.
Paul
vinc...@massol.net wrote:
> Can you explain why you’re trying to do something that’s already
> implemented? You don’t like our current implementation?
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
h
On 27 Nov 2015 at 16:41:34, Paul Libbrecht
(p...@hoplahup.net(mailto:p...@hoplahup.net)) wrote:
>
>
> Caleb James DeLisle wrote:
> > I had just imagined an extension to the markdown standard, not sure
> > exactly
> > how macros ought to be implemented... One possibility:
> >
> > > > $doc.g
Caleb James DeLisle wrote:
> I had just imagined an extension to the markdown standard, not sure
> exactly
> how macros ought to be implemented... One possibility:
>
>$doc.getFullName()
> ?>
>
> or
>
> ?>
Hey, that is very "standard" in the sense of PHP-ish.
I like it but I am sure it can c
I had just imagined an extension to the markdown standard, not sure exactly
how macros ought to be implemented... One possibility:
or
?>
Thanks,
Caleb
On 27/11/15 14:28, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
I'm trying to find "comparable tools" that we could document there as
being comparable experienc
I'm trying to find "comparable tools" that we could document there as
being comparable experiences that users might have met already. I do not
see any yet (Confluence and Jenkins seem to have pedgown as an option,
that's the only similarity I find).
So... this is "just another extended markdown" ?
