Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] XWiki Logo Challenge, Round 2

2010-04-14 Thread Denis Gervalle
IMO it's a bit too late to give -1 for a logo that passed the first round. Is it less readable now? 16 was voted by 11 community members (including myself) in the first round. Do we count less than people from outside the project? If we want a community-chosen logo then we should let the

Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] XWiki Logo Challenge, Round 2

2010-04-14 Thread Vincent Massol
On Apr 13, 2010, at 3:39 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote: Hi all, Guillaume Lerouge wrote: Hi, On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 00:41, Ludovic Dubost ludo...@xwiki.com wrote: +1 for 4A and I'm at this point very -1 on 16 because of the W which has a missing arm.. I can't read XWiki in

Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] XWiki Logo Challenge, Round 2

2010-04-14 Thread Valdis Vītoliņš
Readability is better, but for me upper right backgoing serif for w seems unnecessary. In place of (ascii art): \// \ /\\/\/iki only in this way: \/ /\\/\/iki Then X can be bigger and w can be aligned with k. What do you think? Valdis I completely agree with Marius, I would also add that

[xwiki-users] Quoting in macro calls

2010-04-14 Thread stefan bachert
Hi, I tried to call a macro passing a text which contains both, single and double qoutes {{macro para='this is Developer's Guide in german' /}} {{macro para=this is Developer's Guide in german /}} Both way fails because either quote or apostroph needs to be escaped. I tried usual technics -

Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] XWiki Logo Challenge, Round 2

2010-04-14 Thread Raluca Stavro
Hi all, How about this alternative: http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Community/LogoChallengeRound2/16-variation.png. I think that the W is readable now. Raluca. On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Valdis Vītoliņš valdis.vitol...@odo.lv wrote: Readability is better, but for me upper right

Re: [xwiki-users] Quoting in macro calls

2010-04-14 Thread Thomas Mortagne
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:44, stefan bachert stefanbach...@yahoo.de wrote: Hi, I tried to call a macro passing a text which contains both, single and double qoutes {{macro para='this is Developer's Guide in german' /}} {{macro para=this is Developer's Guide in german /}} Both way fails

Re: [xwiki-users] TWiki Syntax HTML

2010-04-14 Thread Thomas Mortagne
Hi, On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 19:56, Meng Wu meng...@yahoo.com wrote: Hey all, The TWiki syntax doesn't seem to fully support HTML elements like pre, u, nop, and links (they aren't rendered at all or rendered incorrectly). However, basic syntax minus these tags such as verbatim, bullets,

Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] XWiki Logo Challenge, Round 2

2010-04-14 Thread Trevor Russ
I don't particularly like the recent alternative suggestions, the w is either getting unwieldy or too wide, losing its original impact, and I'd drop my +1 for it in those cases. To add my hack, what if: a) the X was made bigger and put behind the Wiki part b) the w was a full W (straighter, not

[xwiki-users] getURL returns full URL with 'http://' prefix on a virtual site

2010-04-14 Thread Colesnicov Eugen
When I address XWiki on a virtual site from outside the local net, the function getURL returns a full string prefixed with 'http://'. If I work from the local net with its true URL (http://server:8080/xwiki), this function returns short URL beginning with '/xwiki/'. As a result of this, the

[xwiki-users] Reverse proxy problems

2010-04-14 Thread Gerhard Esterhuizen
Hi, I recently deployed XWiki Enterprise behind an Apache HTTP server acting as a reverse proxy. This was done in order to map the XWiki web interface into our intranet namespace and to perform SSL termination. To get this working, I had to resort to a few hacks and workarounds due to the fact

Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] XWiki Logo Challenge, Round 2

2010-04-14 Thread Marius Dumitru Florea
Trevor Russ wrote: I don't particularly like the recent alternative suggestions, the w is either getting unwieldy or too wide, losing its original impact, and I'd drop my +1 for it in those cases. To add my hack, what if: a) the X was made bigger and put behind the Wiki part b) the w was