Re: [xwiki-users] Help with Live Table and Grid Component
Hi James,
On 06/08/2010 05:08 AM, James Cuzella wrote:
I'm trying to create a live table similar to the All Docs one in
Main, but filtered for a specific space (in this case, named
Software).
i've used the Live table snippet for the table page itself:
---
{{velocity}}
#set($collist = [doc.name, doc.space,doc.date, doc.author,
_actions])
#set($colprops = {
doc.name : { type : text , size : 30,
link : view},
doc.space : { type : text, link : space},
doc.date : { type : date },
doc.author : { type : text, link : author},
_actions : {actions:
[copy,delete,rename,rights]}
})
#set($options = { resultPage:XWiki.SofwareTableresults,
translationPrefix : xe.index.,
rowCount: 15 })
#livetable(allsoftwaredocs $collist $colprops $options)
{{/velocity}}
---
And here's the Software table results page:
---
{{include document=XWiki.LiveTableResultsMacros /}}
I don't know much about live table but the code below was already
filtering by space if the space name was present on the request (i.e. if
the page was called with space=SomeSpace in the query string). It looks
like you can specify query string parameters using the extraParams
live table option (
http://code.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Macros/LiveTableMacro ). So you
should try using the default data source (XWiki.LiveTableResults) with
extra query string parameters:
#set($options = { extraParams:space=Software,
translationPrefix : xe.index.,
rowCount: 15 })
(of course, this code should be place in the table page, before the call
to livetable macro)
Hope this helps,
Marius
{{velocity}}
#set($extra = )
#if($!request.space != ) #set($extra = ${extra} and doc.space =
'$request.space') #end
#if($!request.orphaned == 1) #set($extra = ${extra} and
doc.parent='' and doc.name'WebHome') #end
#gridresultwithfilter($!request.classname,
$request.collist.split(,), doc.space = 'Software' , ${extra})
{{/velocity}}
---
As soon as I added the doc.space = 'Software' parameter to the
gridresultfilter(), it broke the page and gives: Failed to execute
macro: velocity
What is the correct way to filter the query?
Thanks,
- James Cuzella
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Rights Management UI
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 09:01, Denis Gervalle d...@softec.lu wrote: On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 17:00, Ecaterina Valica vali...@gmail.com wrote: It will if it display the inheritance source in a column. For right set at current level this column could even precise what inheritance has been overwritten, both in terms of allowance and origin. Denis. Hi Denis, Something like this: http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/Rights51Space Yes, something like that. I would have expected a back to basic button in place of advanced, and the removal of the basic interface to avoid duplicating basic rights. Maybe the menu should be horizontal in the advanced interface, I do not know. Also add some hyperlinks to upper level in the column explaining inheritance. And put the highlight of changes over the rest of the row (includes name and inheritance) http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/Rights51Space About: I would have expected a back to basic button in place of advanced, and the removal of the basic interface to avoid duplicating basic rights http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Improvements/Rights43Proposal/rights52Space.png This removal of the basic interface will be set from the user profile's variables (if it has advanced type)? I mean if the user is advanced, all the rows will be presented in advances? I'm asking because I think the collapsed view is great to see changes up in the table, where you don't care the advanced status of those rights. WDYT ? Is this interesting ? it's nice :P I would love to see some other opinions. Thanks, Caty ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Documentation Standard Document Call to Vote
Hello, I think the most important is to have an up to date documentation, so I favour minimalist options * (the fewer the better)*. Q1 : I vote for option b) but this is not conflicting with d) proposed by Thomas. Q2 : Option a) the default skin. A comment regarding this draft : I'm not sure that the USERS mailing list is appropriate to ask for a documentation change. The documentation is a component of the XWiki software and it must match the features implemented. So, for me, the DEV mailing list would be quite natural. ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[xwiki-users] Installation issue / import function
Hello xwiki users, After installing xwiki 2.3 (and 2.3.1 afterwards) on Centos5.5 with MySQL 5.x and Tomcat 5.5 I still have the issue that I cannot import the default .xar file. The same is true for all .xar files: I generated one from this wiki and I wanted to re-import it. No chance yet. Unfortunately I cannot see any problem on xwiki / tomcat or mysql level. Everything looks fine. As I shouldn't provide screen shots, you may have a look at http://m2m.fm:8080/xwiki/bin/admin/Main/WebPreferences. I am looking at this topic for some days now, with no result yet. ANY IDEAS? Thank you very much for your support. Best regards Pierre ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Rights Management UI
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:19, Ecaterina Valica vali...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 09:01, Denis Gervalle d...@softec.lu wrote: On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 17:00, Ecaterina Valica vali...@gmail.com wrote: It will if it display the inheritance source in a column. For right set at current level this column could even precise what inheritance has been overwritten, both in terms of allowance and origin. Denis. Hi Denis, Something like this: http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/Rights51Space Yes, something like that. I would have expected a back to basic button in place of advanced, and the removal of the basic interface to avoid duplicating basic rights. Maybe the menu should be horizontal in the advanced interface, I do not know. Also add some hyperlinks to upper level in the column explaining inheritance. And put the highlight of changes over the rest of the row (includes name and inheritance) http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/Rights51Space About: I would have expected a back to basic button in place of advanced, and the removal of the basic interface to avoid duplicating basic rights http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Improvements/Rights43Proposal/rights52Space.png This removal of the basic interface will be set from the user profile's variables (if it has advanced type)? No, just removed when the advanced interface is shown using the advanced button, like you have done. I mean if the user is advanced, all the rows will be presented in advances? No, the only thing I proposed is that user that are not set Advanced user in their profile, will not be presented the advanced interface link, and will never see extended rights. I'm asking because I think the collapsed view is great to see changes up in the table, where you don't care the advanced status of those rights. I completely agree. Advanced interface is for understanding and fixing deep complex stuffs WDYT ? Is this interesting ? it's nice :P I would love to see some other opinions. Yes, could it be possible for you to fix the interactive version to hide the basics and also to have hover and click work as expected. I think it will helps in receiving more feed back with causing confusion. I found the result really well suited now. There is just some improvement in color contrast, icons aspect, and so on that should be applied if we get approval for this proposal. Once you have fixed the sample, I think that a summary page (resume of our reflexion, and containing only the final proposal) and than a vote thread could be appropriate to receive feedback from other committers, since the size of this thread could be pushing back. WDYT ? Denis Thanks, Caty ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- Denis Gervalle SOFTEC sa - CEO eGuilde sarl - CTO ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Rights Management UI
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Ecaterina Valica vali...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 21:33, Raluca Stavro raluca.moro...@xwiki.comwrote: Hello all, I really like the last proposal, Caty :) On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Alex Busenius alex.busen...@xwiki.com wrote: Hi Caty, This version is really cool, just some minor comments: When I mouse over some right icon (FF 3.6), the dropdown menu with allow/deny/etc. is shown, but this menu is very hard to see, because it has almost the same color as the background and the icons are right above the right icons from the line below. The popup with the hint what right it is and why it is inherited is really helpful, but to open it I need to hit the small triangle near to the icon, otherwise only the dropdown menu is shown (but maybe its just because it is not the final version). This might be quite hard for some people. I'd made the icons larger (at least 24x24) and add more contrast (right now inherited rights look like disabled GUI controls to me), especially to the dropdown menu, view right icon and inherited right arrow from the menu. I think that the tooltip can be added on mouse click. This would imply adding a nice question mark instead of that small arrow, and the user would click anywhere on the span with the class name summary. And another improvement would be to add more padding to the drop down menus. Caty is currently using the secondary background color, right? Maybe we should use the highlight color, but I'm not sure of that. Thanks Raluca. Yes, a better solution is be to increase the padding and also use $theme.backgroundSecondaryColor (or a darker tone). The problem is that on default theme, backgroundSecondaryColor is a gray color and the contrast with the gray icon is not that good. In terms of interaction I think hover on tooltip and click on arrow for changing the rights is better. The user browse the rights to see the inheritance and see what those rights means, and when he made up his mind he clicks and change the right. There are more cases when the users is just browsing the rights, inspecting or see rights meaning, than actually change them; so the harder activity (clicking) should be put on changing the right. The small arrow is a sign that there is a menu. If the menu will appear on click, the arrow is necessary to work as an invitation and also to keep the consistency with actionMenus. Raluca, do you think we should use bigger icons, like Alex suggested? Maybe if we put enough padding and we work a bit on the contrast (backgroundSecondaryColor, highlightColor) this won't be necessary. No, the icon size is ok. I modified a bit proposal 5.1 (I hope it's ok with you Caty, otherwise we can revert the changes and add proposal 5.2) http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/Rights51Space . I added more padding, more margin, a bigger width for the available rights to change (.submenuitem a span.changedRight) and I've made the arrow a bit bigger (102% font size). This way the user will select easier the items. I didn't have time to change the way the submenu is displayed (click instead of mouse over), but it's clear for me the way it will look like and I really think that this proposal is clean and easy to use/understand. Raluca. The only advantage of another color set would be a greater space for user to click/hover (we can fix that with padding). The disadvantage is that the lookfeel will be broken and also other icons will not correlate actions done in XWiki (edit, delete, comment, etc) with the corresponding rights. If the hover/click and the size of the icons are the only problem :) then is ok Thanks, Caty Raluca. Alex On 06/04/2010 06:54 PM, Ecaterina Valica wrote: Hi, Take a look at Rights 5 http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/Rights5Space Added: * information regarding the advanced rights (inherits, overrides) * icons built together as a whole http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Improvements/Rights5Space/icons.png * representation of advanced rights with the same abstract icon, but with different color (no text; we can debate this) http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Improvements/Rights5Space/color.png * inheritance arrow married with +/- IMGs (in case of browser problem) - collapsed: http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Improvements/Rights5Space/rights5Space.png - expanded: http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Improvements/Rights5Space/rights5SpaceExpanded.png On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 10:42, Denis Gervalle d...@softec.lu wrote: Hi Caty, On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 18:09, Ecaterina Valica vali...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Denis, I want to thank you again for all the help you are giving :P This is pleasure to participate especially because you provide really good proposals. I
[xwiki-users] Installation issue / import function
Hello xwiki users, hello caleb, The link links to the life system, so you simply may select the xar, click on on importing, you get the toc of the xar and finally you may import it with an error message of the importing tool. Yes, we use Firefox (but it also happens on IE8). Best regards Pierre -Original Message- From: Caleb James DeLisle [mailto:calebdeli...@lavabit.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 1:32 PM To: XWiki Users Subject: Re: [xwiki-users] Installation issue / import function What happens when you try to import (how far do you get?) Importing is part of the automated tests which are run on firefox, are you using a different browser? We have had issues with Microsoft browsers in the past. Caleb Dalluege, Pierre (extern) wrote: Hello xwiki users, After installing xwiki 2.3 (and 2.3.1 afterwards) on Centos5.5 with MySQL 5.x and Tomcat 5.5 I still have the issue that I cannot import the default .xar file. The same is true for all .xar files: I generated one from this wiki and I wanted to re-import it. No chance yet. Unfortunately I cannot see any problem on xwiki / tomcat or mysql level. Everything looks fine. As I shouldn't provide screen shots, you may have a look at http://m2m.fm:8080/xwiki/bin/admin/Main/WebPreferences. I am looking at this topic for some days now, with no result yet. ANY IDEAS? Thank you very much for your support. Best regards Pierre ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [xwiki-users] Installation issue / import function
Hi, On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Dalluege, Pierre (extern) p.dallu...@external.telekom.de wrote: Hello xwiki users, After installing xwiki 2.3 (and 2.3.1 afterwards) on Centos5.5 with MySQL 5.x and Tomcat 5.5 I still have the issue that I cannot import the default .xar file. The same is true for all .xar files: I generated one from this wiki and I wanted to re-import it. No chance yet. Unfortunately I cannot see any problem on xwiki / tomcat or mysql level. Everything looks fine. Are you sure tomcat logs don't have any exceptions logged? I have experienced issues with importing when max_allowed_packet (mysql configuration) is not large enough. And did you make sure that your xar file is valid? (Not corrupted) - Asiri ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[xwiki-users] [myxwiki] XWiki Enterprise 2.4 Milestone 1 Upgrade
Hello, myxwiki.org has been upgraded to XE 2.4 Milestone 1, if you own a wiki hosted there you should have a look at : http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/ReleaseNotesXWikiEnterprise24M1 We also strongly recommend an upgrade to the latest wiki version. To upgrade you must download XE 2.4 Milestone 1 XWiki XAR from : http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Download And follow the upgrade guide available at : http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/AdminGuide/Installation#HUpgradingwikidocuments To be notified of the myxwiki.org server upgrade you can follow myxwiki on twitter: http://twitter.com/myxwiki Thanks, -- Thomas Mortagne ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[xwiki-users] showing xwiki-page incl. images in jsp.
hi, i'm new on the group but i use xwiki since 3 years. for a automatic display panel application we show a xwiki-page via rpc like the reference http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Features/XMLRPC; but with this code we can't display images. only the name of the picture will displayed. have anybody a solution/reference for this problem. with regards -the- ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[xwiki-users] Installation issue / import function
Hello xwiki users, hello asiri, Thank you very much for your personal support. I have no errors in the tomcat log, but I also increased the packet size before. BR Pierre -Original Message- From: Asiri Rathnayake [mailto:asiri.rathnay...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 1:47 PM To: XWiki Users Subject: Re: [xwiki-users] Installation issue / import function Hi, On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Dalluege, Pierre (extern) p.dallu...@external.telekom.de wrote: Hello xwiki users, After installing xwiki 2.3 (and 2.3.1 afterwards) on Centos5.5 with MySQL 5.x and Tomcat 5.5 I still have the issue that I cannot import the default .xar file. The same is true for all .xar files: I generated one from this wiki and I wanted to re-import it. No chance yet. Unfortunately I cannot see any problem on xwiki / tomcat or mysql level. Everything looks fine. Are you sure tomcat logs don't have any exceptions logged? I have experienced issues with importing when max_allowed_packet (mysql configuration) is not large enough. And did you make sure that your xar file is valid? (Not corrupted) - Asiri ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Documentation Standard Document Call to Vote
Just to point out that my comment is focused on the Documentation Standard draft, not the current mailing thread. Following the document, if you want to update a page or create a new one, you have to ask the XWiki community before starting. Below this sentence, the user mailing list is clearly specified. Maxime 2010/6/8 Thomas Mortagne thomas.morta...@xwiki.com Actually you answered on USERS only but the proposal has been sent on both USERS and DEVS ;) -- Thomas Mortagne ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
