Re: [xwiki-users] Editing text in box in WYSIWYG mode

2017-02-01 Thread Vishal
It works perfectly. Thanx, you saved my day -- View this message in context: http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/Editing-text-in-box-in-WYSIWYG-mode-tp7602588p7602633.html Sent from the XWiki- Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [xwiki-users] Failed to Save Error

2017-02-01 Thread Marius Dumitru Florea
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 10:09 PM, Jesse Bright wrote: > We are just http. The protocol and domain match. Here is a sample of the > debugger text: > > > Failed to open http://codewiki.info/edit/Corrections/2016/CEC+210.52(E) >

Re: [xwiki-users] Editing text in box in WYSIWYG mode

2017-02-01 Thread Marius Dumitru Florea
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 7:30 AM, Vishal wrote: > Thanks. It is just what I wanted > But I also use cssClass="SummaryBox" in Box macro for right-floating the > SummaryBox. > I tried using it as (% class="box" cssClass="SummaryBox" %) which seems not > working. > Am I

Re: [xwiki-users] Editing text in box in WYSIWYG mode

2017-02-01 Thread Vishal
Thanks. It is just what I wanted But I also use cssClass="SummaryBox" in Box macro for right-floating the SummaryBox. I tried using it as (% class="box" cssClass="SummaryBox" %) which seems not working. Am I missing something? -- View this message in context:

Re: [xwiki-users] Failed to Save Error

2017-02-01 Thread Vishal
I too get this error when I create a new page and try to save it. I am currently using 8.4 but had the same issue in last version also. What I do then is, "Save and Continue", which is followed by error. Then "Save and View". -- View this message in context:

Re: [xwiki-users] Failed to Save Error

2017-02-01 Thread Jesse Bright
We are just http. The protocol and domain match. Here is a sample of the debugger text: Failed to open http://codewiki.info/edit/Corrections/2016/CEC+210.52(E)(3)?template=Corrections.2016.2016Template=Corrections.2016.WebHome Regards, Jesse > On Feb 1, 2017, at 9:33 AM, Marius Dumitru

Re: [xwiki-users] Failed to Save Error

2017-02-01 Thread Marius Dumitru Florea
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Jesse Bright wrote: > The error occurs with both "Save & Continue" and "Save & View", though if > I choose "Save & Continue" first it allows me to keep going after the error > so I can then press "Save & View" without generating the error

Re: [xwiki-users] Failed to Save Error

2017-02-01 Thread Jesse Bright
The error occurs with both "Save & Continue" and "Save & View", though if I choose "Save & Continue" first it allows me to keep going after the error so I can then press "Save & View" without generating the error since the page now exists. I checked the dev tools and it generated two errors.

[xwiki-users] timeout in job scheduler?

2017-02-01 Thread Pascal BASTIEN
Hello, I created a job scheduled in scheduler, but sometime my job seem to be failed sometime. In my groovy job I add some logging system: some text sent to a xwiki page+save but didn't find interesting things. Of course I have some loops (I things) in my script (to list groups member):

Re: [xwiki-users] Potential bug in Ubuntu dist of 9.0

2017-02-01 Thread Thomas Mortagne
Yes you are right, it's a typo. Thanks for the report. On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:57 PM, Craig Wright wrote: > Noticed this in xwiki.cfg, diff between 8.4.4 and 9.0: > > 102c105 > < # xwiki.store.migration.manager.hint=hibernate > --- >> #

[xwiki-users] hardware for a fast xwiki 8.4

2017-02-01 Thread Pascal BASTIEN
Hello, We must change our server to use xwiki. Do you have simple recommandations about requirement ( CPU, specialy RAM because server provided is a VM, ...) to have for a fast xwiki? On this server I will install: - debian stable Jessie - Tomcat 8.5.5 version probably - postgreSQL server -

Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] [ANN] XWiki 9.0 released

2017-02-01 Thread Marius Dumitru Florea
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 8:38 PM, Eduard Moraru wrote: > The XWiki development team is proud to announce the availability of XWiki > 9.0. > > This release marks the start of the 9.x cycle and features mostly developer > and admin feature improvements. The most notable ones