Hello,
+0.7 to declare 16 the winner and improve it
+0.2 to start a third round between improved version of 4 and 16
+0.1 to start all over
What do you think about this:
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Community/LogoChallengeRound2/16-variation-engineering.png
?
Raluca.
On Mon, Apr
Raluca Stavro wrote:
Hello,
+0.7 to declare 16 the winner and improve it
+0.2 to start a third round between improved version of 4 and 16
+0.1 to start all over
What do you think about this:
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Community/LogoChallengeRound2/16-variation-engineering.png
On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:19 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
Hello Community,
The search for the XWiki.org logo isn't over yet...
The second round of votes finished, with the following results:
+9 for 4
+4 for 12 (I counted Thibaut's +1 for 12A as a +1 for 12)
+1 for 15
+14 for 16
+1 for 19
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 13:39, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net wrote:
On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:19 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
Hello Community,
The search for the XWiki.org logo isn't over yet...
The second round of votes finished, with the following results:
+9 for 4
+4 for
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 13:30, Raluca Stavro raluca.moro...@xwiki.com wrote:
Hello,
+0.7 to declare 16 the winner and improve it
+0.2 to start a third round between improved version of 4 and 16
+0.1 to start all over
What do you think about this:
We should believe in evolution, not in intelligent design ;-)
For me topology (i.e. shapes of character) looks good, though I'd like
right part for w parallel to slope parts of X and k, with iki size
adjusted accordingly
(probably they need to be smaller then).
Wouldn't it be better?
Valdis
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 14:30, Raluca Stavro raluca.moro...@xwiki.comwrote:
Hello,
+0.7 to declare 16 the winner and improve it
+0.2 to start a third round between improved version of 4 and 16
+0.1 to start all over
What do you think about this:
On Apr 20, 2010, at 1:52 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 13:30, Raluca Stavro raluca.moro...@xwiki.com wrote:
Hello,
+0.7 to declare 16 the winner and improve it
+0.2 to start a third round between improved version of 4 and 16
+0.1 to start all over
What do you think
On 04/19/2010 09:19 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
Hello Community,
The search for the XWiki.org logo isn't over yet...
The second round of votes finished, with the following results:
+9 for 4
+4 for 12 (I counted Thibaut's +1 for 12A as a +1 for 12)
+1 for 15
+14 for 16
+1 for 19
Raluca,
Currently, the text is optically aligned with the apex of the right speech
bubble. Aligning the mark to the type would harm its balance.
Anyway, I'll come up with another proposal pretty soonish.
--
View this message in context:
My humble try. Speech bubbles, negative space X.
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Community/LogoChallengeRound2/xwikiroundedalt.png
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Community/LogoChallengeRound2/xwikiroundedalt.png
--
View this message in context:
IMO it's a bit too late to give -1 for a logo that passed the first
round. Is it less readable now?
16 was voted by 11 community members (including myself) in the first
round. Do we count less than people from outside the project? If we
want a community-chosen logo then we should let the
On Apr 13, 2010, at 3:39 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
Hi all,
Guillaume Lerouge wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 00:41, Ludovic Dubost ludo...@xwiki.com wrote:
+1 for 4A
and I'm at this point very -1 on 16 because of the W which has a missing
arm..
I can't read XWiki in
Readability is better, but for me upper right backgoing serif for w
seems unnecessary.
In place of (ascii art):
\// \
/\\/\/iki
only in this way:
\/
/\\/\/iki
Then X can be bigger and w can be aligned with k.
What do you think?
Valdis
I completely agree with Marius, I would also add that
Hi all,
How about this alternative:
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Community/LogoChallengeRound2/16-variation.png.
I think that the W is readable now.
Raluca.
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Valdis Vītoliņš
valdis.vitol...@odo.lv wrote:
Readability is better, but for me upper right
I don't particularly like the recent alternative suggestions, the w is either
getting unwieldy or too wide, losing its original impact, and I'd drop my +1
for it in those cases.
To add my hack, what if:
a) the X was made bigger and put behind the Wiki part
b) the w was a full W (straighter, not
Trevor Russ wrote:
I don't particularly like the recent alternative suggestions, the w is
either getting unwieldy or too wide, losing its original impact, and I'd drop
my +1 for it in those cases.
To add my hack, what if:
a) the X was made bigger and put behind the Wiki part
b) the w was
Maybe I am late... Anyway
+1 for 4A.
-Fabio
On Apr 8, 2010, at 6:02 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
VOTING:
You can send your vote on the mailing list (d...@xwiki.org or
users@xwiki.org), in reply to this email. No twitter votes this time.
Each voter can grant a whole +1 to only one of the
On Apr 13, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 00:41, Ludovic Dubost ludo...@xwiki.com wrote:
+1 for 4A
and I'm at this point very -1 on 16 because of the W which has a missing
arm..
I can't read XWiki in it..
I'd like to react about this:
On 04/13/2010 11:29 AM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 00:41, Ludovic Dubostludo...@xwiki.com wrote:
+1 for 4A
and I'm at this point very -1 on 16 because of the W which has a missing
arm..
I can't read XWiki in it..
I'd like to react about this: at this stage I
On Apr 13, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 00:41, Ludovic Dubost ludo...@xwiki.com wrote:
+1 for 4A
and I'm at this point very -1 on 16 because of the W which has a missing
arm..
I can't read XWiki in it..
I'd like to react about this:
Hi,
I think version 16 is the ONLY original logo we have for this challenge.
It is abstract enough to make a great brand and be reused for variations.
It is simple, straightforward and easily to remember (not to reproduce, to
remember that you've seen it before).
It's look IMO is perfect for a
Btw, logos are graphical marks and is not mandatory that they are logotypes
(wordmarks). This means you don't necessarily need to read the name of the
product from the start (look at apple, volkswagen, audi, sun, etc). After
you know it's XWiki, you can easily see what proposal 16 states.
The
On Apr 13, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Ecaterina Valica wrote:
Btw, logos are graphical marks and is not mandatory that they are logotypes
(wordmarks). This means you don't necessarily need to read the name of the
product from the start (look at apple, volkswagen, audi, sun, etc). After
you know it's
Hi all,
Guillaume Lerouge wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 00:41, Ludovic Dubost ludo...@xwiki.com wrote:
+1 for 4A
and I'm at this point very -1 on 16 because of the W which has a missing
arm..
I can't read XWiki in it..
I'd like to react about this: at this stage I share
+1 for 4
Thomas
Le 12/04/10 10:22, Jerome Velociter a écrit :
+1 for 4
Jerome.
+1 to 16B (default-straight).
Raluca.
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Sergiu Dumitriuser...@xwiki.com wrote:
Hello XWiki Community,
We're still looking for the new XWiki.org logo. First of
Hi,
+0.8 for 12A
+0.2 for 16B
--
Thibaut Camberlin
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Thomas Eveilleau tho...@xwiki.com wrote:
+1 for 4
Thomas
Le 12/04/10 10:22, Jerome Velociter a écrit :
+1 for 4
Jerome.
+1 to 16B (default-straight).
Raluca.
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 7:02
My corrected vote is +1 for 12A.
:)
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Thibaut Camberlin
thibaut.camber...@xwiki.com wrote:
Hi,
+0.8 for 12A
+0.2 for 16B
--
Thibaut Camberlin
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Thomas Eveilleau tho...@xwiki.comwrote:
+1 for 4
Thomas
Le 12/04/10
hard to choose, but it's gonna be
+1 for 16B (slanted Ws).
Happy hacking,
Anca
On 04/08/2010 07:02 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
Hello XWiki Community,
We're still looking for the new XWiki.org logo. First of all, many
thanks to all those who submitted their ideas (
+1 for 4A
and I'm at this point very -1 on 16 because of the W which has a missing
arm..
I can't read XWiki in it..
Ludovic
Le 12/04/10 16:44, Sergiu Dumitriu a écrit :
On 04/12/2010 04:30 PM, Thibaut Camberlin wrote:
My corrected vote is +1 for 12A.
12A has been retired and is
+1 16b
Slanted w's
On 04/08/2010 07:02 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
Hello XWiki Community,
We're still looking for the new XWiki.org logo. First of all, many
thanks to all those who submitted their ideas (
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/Community/LogoChallenge ). After the
first round of
I like both 4A and 12E but 4A is less close to old xwik.org so:
+1 for 4A
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 18:02, Sergiu Dumitriu ser...@xwiki.com wrote:
Hello XWiki Community,
We're still looking for the new XWiki.org logo. First of all, many
thanks to all those who submitted their ideas (
Hi,
I'm +1 for 4A too. Looks very nice with the brighter colors!
Guillaume
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 16:56, Thomas Mortagne thomas.morta...@xwiki.comwrote:
I like both 4A and 12E but 4A is less close to old xwik.org so:
+1 for 4A
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 18:02, Sergiu Dumitriu ser...@xwiki.com
33 matches
Mail list logo
