Re: [xwiki-users] This object is currently locked by - section editing

2010-11-18 Thread Piotr Dziubecki
Hi Joris,

I think that you can accomplish your scenario partially by using the following 
macro:

{{include document=TestPage2/}}

That will give you another page linked into yours in the 'in-line' mode. 
Unfortunately you cannot edit such 
page from the context of your main document.

W dniu 10-11-18 00:56, Joris Dirks wrote:
 Real-time editing would be great, but IMHO a real tough job to
 accomplish with a complicated markup language as XWiki's. Section
 editing is to me/us a great one, too. I'd go even further: in my frame
 of mind, a section is nothing different from a page.
 I see many users finnicking around, not sure if they should put
 everything on a topic in one page with headers, or splitting the text
 in different pages.

 As we already have hierarchy, it would make sense to me to let users
 just create a new 'sub-page' below their current content. That
 sub-page is, in the data model, just a child with a weight set; for
 the original page, a property is set like: content splitted in child
 pages, include every child in order of ascending weight.

In fact, before I migrated to XWiki I wanted to use Wiki from Liferay and since 
their implementation doesn't 
support sections at all, I had a plan to substitute them like in your idea. 
Unfortunately this cannot be 
done without an application model redesign ( like how to handle subdocument 
reindexing if you add/remove 
something from the middle of structure etc. ).

What I want to say is that currently I'd opt for the simplest solutions because 
they don't need a lot of 
work with implementation :)

Regards,
Piotr


 Did I make any sense to you guys?


 On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.]
 ricardo.rodrig...@ebiotic.net  wrote:


 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:
 W dniu 10-11-04 21:28, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:

 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:

 W dniu 10-11-04 12:13, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:


 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:


 Hi :)


 W dniu 10-11-04 11:08, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:



 Hi!

 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:



 Hello :)

 I configured my XWiki instance in the following way:



 #-# This parameter will activate the sectional editing.
 xwiki.section.edit=1

 #-# This parameter controls the depth of sections that have section 
 editing.
 #-# By default level 1 and level 2 sections have section editing.
 xwiki.section.depth=6


 I have many users working on documents simultaneously and in order to 
 minimize document locking and possible
 merging I encourage them to edit sections/paragraphs instead. I 
 noticed that when, for instance, two users
 edit different sections within the same page, the latter gets the 
 message:

 This object is currently locked by user1

 I checked and it's possible to force editing and save both of 
 concurrent changes to that document, but the
 message itself is a bit confusing to the users. I'm asking if it's 
 possible to change xwiki configuration to
 not display that message when the users edit different paragraphs 
 within the same page ?



 To the best of my understanding locking is set a document level. So, if
 any user edits a section, all other users will receive that message.

 I think what you are doing is a bit risky. I've had here some problems
 following the same problem. When an user received this message, 
 although
 she/he is editing only a section, there is no way of knowing if they 
 are
 in the same section or in a different one. Even more, if you edit a
 document using the same user at two different locations, you won't
 receive the locking message.



 Yes, I came from the Media Wiki and section editing is pretty popular 
 way of collaborative editing (
 avoiding the whole page locks ).


 I also arrives to XWiki from MediaWiki years ago. So, with the current
 MediaWiki release, is it possible to do section edition and get a
 warning only if two users edit the same section?

 Thanks!


 To be sure, I did some tests here:

 http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Sandbox

 no warnings, you can even edit the same section but then you'll need to 
 get through the merge phase. In that
 case you see such a message:

 Someone else has changed this page since you started editing it. The 
 upper text area contains the page text
 as it currently exists. Your changes are shown in the lower text area. 
 You will have to merge your changes
 into the existing text.




 Well, I don't see this blocking behaviour working with MediaWiki
 sandbox... I don't know why! In any case, MediaWiki is not the case here!

 Just summing up:


 Thanks for that summary, let me comment on your thoughts:



 1. Simultaneous edition is possible, but not advisable with the current
 XWiki release.


 Yes, especially that there is no merge phase after concurrent editing ( or 
 maybe there is a 'merge plugin' -
 I'd be grateful for any info on that ). In that case you end up with the 
 article content overridden by
 someone else and your only hope is to dig in the document's history and try 
 to fix 

Re: [xwiki-users] This object is currently locked by - section editing

2010-11-18 Thread Joris Dirks
HI Piotr,

On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Piotr Dziubecki deep...@man.poznan.pl wrote:
 Hi Joris,

 I think that you can accomplish your scenario partially by using the 
 following macro:

 {{include document=TestPage2/}}

 That will give you another page linked into yours in the 'in-line' mode. 
 Unfortunately you cannot edit such
 page from the context of your main document.

Thanks, that's indeed the modus we are using right now. Yet it isn't
easy enough :)

 W dniu 10-11-18 00:56, Joris Dirks wrote:
 Real-time editing would be great, but IMHO a real tough job to
 accomplish with a complicated markup language as XWiki's. Section
 editing is to me/us a great one, too. I'd go even further: in my frame
 of mind, a section is nothing different from a page.
 I see many users finnicking around, not sure if they should put
 everything on a topic in one page with headers, or splitting the text
 in different pages.

 As we already have hierarchy, it would make sense to me to let users
 just create a new 'sub-page' below their current content. That
 sub-page is, in the data model, just a child with a weight set; for
 the original page, a property is set like: content splitted in child
 pages, include every child in order of ascending weight.

 In fact, before I migrated to XWiki I wanted to use Wiki from Liferay and 
 since their implementation doesn't
 support sections at all, I had a plan to substitute them like in your idea. 
 Unfortunately this cannot be
 done without an application model redesign ( like how to handle subdocument 
 reindexing if you add/remove
 something from the middle of structure etc. ).

 What I want to say is that currently I'd opt for the simplest solutions 
 because they don't need a lot of
 work with implementation :)

 Regards,
 Piotr


 Did I make any sense to you guys?


 On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.]
 ricardo.rodrig...@ebiotic.net  wrote:


 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:
 W dniu 10-11-04 21:28, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:

 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:

 W dniu 10-11-04 12:13, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:


 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:


 Hi :)


 W dniu 10-11-04 11:08, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:



 Hi!

 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:



 Hello :)

 I configured my XWiki instance in the following way:



 #-# This parameter will activate the sectional editing.
 xwiki.section.edit=1

 #-# This parameter controls the depth of sections that have section 
 editing.
 #-# By default level 1 and level 2 sections have section editing.
 xwiki.section.depth=6


 I have many users working on documents simultaneously and in order 
 to minimize document locking and possible
 merging I encourage them to edit sections/paragraphs instead. I 
 noticed that when, for instance, two users
 edit different sections within the same page, the latter gets the 
 message:

 This object is currently locked by user1

 I checked and it's possible to force editing and save both of 
 concurrent changes to that document, but the
 message itself is a bit confusing to the users. I'm asking if it's 
 possible to change xwiki configuration to
 not display that message when the users edit different paragraphs 
 within the same page ?



 To the best of my understanding locking is set a document level. So, 
 if
 any user edits a section, all other users will receive that message.

 I think what you are doing is a bit risky. I've had here some problems
 following the same problem. When an user received this message, 
 although
 she/he is editing only a section, there is no way of knowing if they 
 are
 in the same section or in a different one. Even more, if you edit a
 document using the same user at two different locations, you won't
 receive the locking message.



 Yes, I came from the Media Wiki and section editing is pretty popular 
 way of collaborative editing (
 avoiding the whole page locks ).


 I also arrives to XWiki from MediaWiki years ago. So, with the current
 MediaWiki release, is it possible to do section edition and get a
 warning only if two users edit the same section?

 Thanks!


 To be sure, I did some tests here:

 http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Sandbox

 no warnings, you can even edit the same section but then you'll need to 
 get through the merge phase. In that
 case you see such a message:

 Someone else has changed this page since you started editing it. The 
 upper text area contains the page text
 as it currently exists. Your changes are shown in the lower text area. 
 You will have to merge your changes
 into the existing text.




 Well, I don't see this blocking behaviour working with MediaWiki
 sandbox... I don't know why! In any case, MediaWiki is not the case here!

 Just summing up:


 Thanks for that summary, let me comment on your thoughts:



 1. Simultaneous edition is possible, but not advisable with the current
 XWiki release.


 Yes, especially that there is no merge phase after concurrent editing ( or 
 maybe there is a 'merge plugin' -
 

Re: [xwiki-users] This object is currently locked by - section editing

2010-11-17 Thread Joris Dirks
Real-time editing would be great, but IMHO a real tough job to
accomplish with a complicated markup language as XWiki's. Section
editing is to me/us a great one, too. I'd go even further: in my frame
of mind, a section is nothing different from a page.
I see many users finnicking around, not sure if they should put
everything on a topic in one page with headers, or splitting the text
in different pages.

As we already have hierarchy, it would make sense to me to let users
just create a new 'sub-page' below their current content. That
sub-page is, in the data model, just a child with a weight set; for
the original page, a property is set like: content splitted in child
pages, include every child in order of ascending weight.

Did I make any sense to you guys?


On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.]
ricardo.rodrig...@ebiotic.net wrote:


 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:
 W dniu 10-11-04 21:28, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:

 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:

 W dniu 10-11-04 12:13, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:


 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:


 Hi :)


 W dniu 10-11-04 11:08, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:



 Hi!

 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:



 Hello :)

 I configured my XWiki instance in the following way:



 #-# This parameter will activate the sectional editing.
 xwiki.section.edit=1

 #-# This parameter controls the depth of sections that have section 
 editing.
 #-# By default level 1 and level 2 sections have section editing.
 xwiki.section.depth=6


 I have many users working on documents simultaneously and in order to 
 minimize document locking and possible
 merging I encourage them to edit sections/paragraphs instead. I 
 noticed that when, for instance, two users
 edit different sections within the same page, the latter gets the 
 message:

 This object is currently locked by user1

 I checked and it's possible to force editing and save both of 
 concurrent changes to that document, but the
 message itself is a bit confusing to the users. I'm asking if it's 
 possible to change xwiki configuration to
 not display that message when the users edit different paragraphs 
 within the same page ?



 To the best of my understanding locking is set a document level. So, if
 any user edits a section, all other users will receive that message.

 I think what you are doing is a bit risky. I've had here some problems
 following the same problem. When an user received this message, although
 she/he is editing only a section, there is no way of knowing if they are
 in the same section or in a different one. Even more, if you edit a
 document using the same user at two different locations, you won't
 receive the locking message.



 Yes, I came from the Media Wiki and section editing is pretty popular 
 way of collaborative editing (
 avoiding the whole page locks ).


 I also arrives to XWiki from MediaWiki years ago. So, with the current
 MediaWiki release, is it possible to do section edition and get a
 warning only if two users edit the same section?

 Thanks!


 To be sure, I did some tests here:

 http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Sandbox

 no warnings, you can even edit the same section but then you'll need to 
 get through the merge phase. In that
 case you see such a message:

 Someone else has changed this page since you started editing it. The upper 
 text area contains the page text
 as it currently exists. Your changes are shown in the lower text area. You 
 will have to merge your changes
 into the existing text.




 Well, I don't see this blocking behaviour working with MediaWiki
 sandbox... I don't know why! In any case, MediaWiki is not the case here!

 Just summing up:


 Thanks for that summary, let me comment on your thoughts:



 1. Simultaneous edition is possible, but not advisable with the current
 XWiki release.


 Yes, especially that there is no merge phase after concurrent editing ( or 
 maybe there is a 'merge plugin' -
 I'd be grateful for any info on that ). In that case you end up with the 
 article content overridden by
 someone else and your only hope is to dig in the document's history and try 
 to fix edits manually.


 2. Locking is done at document level.


 Is that going to change in the future ? In my opinion that basically blocks 
 user groups/communities from
 working on the documents in a collaborative way. Is it much work to make 
 that lock 'section sensitive',
 architecture-wise ?  If someone could describe what should be done / changed 
 in order to achieve that, maybe
 we could figure out a solution for that issue.



 3. A true real-time edition editor for XWiki is on its way and will
 solve all these issues!


 Well, it could be, but it's based on the js/ajax - it could be tricky to 
 achieve a good level of
 compatibility between browsers ( of course it could be done, Google docs is 
 a good example here ). Of course
 I'd take that right away in the stable form. But I think merging/lock on the 
 section level could be more
 than enough for the 

Re: [xwiki-users] This object is currently locked by - section editing

2010-11-15 Thread Piotr Dziubecki


W dniu 10-11-13 09:50, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote:


 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:
 W dniu 10-11-04 21:28, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:

 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:

 W dniu 10-11-04 12:13, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:


 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:


 Hi :)


 W dniu 10-11-04 11:08, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:



 Hi!

 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:



 Hello :)

 I configured my XWiki instance in the following way:



 #-# This parameter will activate the sectional editing.
 xwiki.section.edit=1

 #-# This parameter controls the depth of sections that have section 
 editing.
 #-# By default level 1 and level 2 sections have section editing.
 xwiki.section.depth=6


 I have many users working on documents simultaneously and in order to 
 minimize document locking and possible
 merging I encourage them to edit sections/paragraphs instead. I 
 noticed that when, for instance, two users
 edit different sections within the same page, the latter gets the 
 message:

 This object is currently locked by user1

 I checked and it's possible to force editing and save both of 
 concurrent changes to that document, but the
 message itself is a bit confusing to the users. I'm asking if it's 
 possible to change xwiki configuration to
 not display that message when the users edit different paragraphs 
 within the same page ?



 To the best of my understanding locking is set a document level. So, if
 any user edits a section, all other users will receive that message.

 I think what you are doing is a bit risky. I've had here some problems
 following the same problem. When an user received this message, although
 she/he is editing only a section, there is no way of knowing if they are
 in the same section or in a different one. Even more, if you edit a
 document using the same user at two different locations, you won't
 receive the locking message.



 Yes, I came from the Media Wiki and section editing is pretty popular 
 way of collaborative editing (
 avoiding the whole page locks ).


 I also arrives to XWiki from MediaWiki years ago. So, with the current
 MediaWiki release, is it possible to do section edition and get a
 warning only if two users edit the same section?

 Thanks!


 To be sure, I did some tests here:

 http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Sandbox

 no warnings, you can even edit the same section but then you'll need to 
 get through the merge phase. In that
 case you see such a message:

 Someone else has changed this page since you started editing it. The upper 
 text area contains the page text
 as it currently exists. Your changes are shown in the lower text area. You 
 will have to merge your changes
 into the existing text.




 Well, I don't see this blocking behaviour working with MediaWiki
 sandbox... I don't know why! In any case, MediaWiki is not the case here!

 Just summing up:


 Thanks for that summary, let me comment on your thoughts:



 1. Simultaneous edition is possible, but not advisable with the current
 XWiki release.


 Yes, especially that there is no merge phase after concurrent editing ( or 
 maybe there is a 'merge plugin' -
 I'd be grateful for any info on that ). In that case you end up with the 
 article content overridden by
 someone else and your only hope is to dig in the document's history and try 
 to fix edits manually.


 2. Locking is done at document level.


 Is that going to change in the future ? In my opinion that basically blocks 
 user groups/communities from
 working on the documents in a collaborative way. Is it much work to make 
 that lock 'section sensitive',
 architecture-wise ?  If someone could describe what should be done / changed 
 in order to achieve that, maybe
 we could figure out a solution for that issue.



 3. A true real-time edition editor for XWiki is on its way and will
 solve all these issues!


 Well, it could be, but it's based on the js/ajax - it could be tricky to 
 achieve a good level of
 compatibility between browsers ( of course it could be done, Google docs is 
 a good example here ). Of course
 I'd take that right away in the stable form. But I think merging/lock on the 
 section level could be more
 than enough for the ordinary wiki users ( Wikipedia is basing on that model 
 on a huge scale and it's doing
 fine ;) )


 It will be great if some developer or more skilled user could review
 this statements to confirm/deny/complete them! Thanks!


 I concur. Currently I'm struggling to figure out how to get over that 
 problem. I can tell my users just to
 ignore the lock message, but that is not super safe and could cause a 
 content loss/corruption.

 Looking forward to your feedback guys !


 I do agree with you, Piotr. In fact, when I present XWiki to a new group
 of users, this is the question I would like to avoid: how XWiki manage
 concurrent edition?

 I talk about locking behaviour and a future real-time editor, but this
 is not a good answer at all. To use instant messaging to agree on a
 timetable to edit a 

Re: [xwiki-users] This object is currently locked by - section editing

2010-11-15 Thread Sergiu Dumitriu
On 11/15/2010 11:23 AM, Piotr Dziubecki wrote:


 W dniu 10-11-13 09:50, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote:


 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:
 W dniu 10-11-04 21:28, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:

 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:

 W dniu 10-11-04 12:13, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:


 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:


 Hi :)


 W dniu 10-11-04 11:08, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:



 Hi!

 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:



 Hello :)

 I configured my XWiki instance in the following way:



 #-# This parameter will activate the sectional editing.
 xwiki.section.edit=1

 #-# This parameter controls the depth of sections that have section 
 editing.
 #-# By default level 1 and level 2 sections have section editing.
 xwiki.section.depth=6


 I have many users working on documents simultaneously and in order to 
 minimize document locking and possible
 merging I encourage them to edit sections/paragraphs instead. I 
 noticed that when, for instance, two users
 edit different sections within the same page, the latter gets the 
 message:

 This object is currently locked by user1

 I checked and it's possible to force editing and save both of 
 concurrent changes to that document, but the
 message itself is a bit confusing to the users. I'm asking if it's 
 possible to change xwiki configuration to
 not display that message when the users edit different paragraphs 
 within the same page ?



 To the best of my understanding locking is set a document level. So, if
 any user edits a section, all other users will receive that message.

 I think what you are doing is a bit risky. I've had here some problems
 following the same problem. When an user received this message, 
 although
 she/he is editing only a section, there is no way of knowing if they 
 are
 in the same section or in a different one. Even more, if you edit a
 document using the same user at two different locations, you won't
 receive the locking message.



 Yes, I came from the Media Wiki and section editing is pretty popular 
 way of collaborative editing (
 avoiding the whole page locks ).


 I also arrives to XWiki from MediaWiki years ago. So, with the current
 MediaWiki release, is it possible to do section edition and get a
 warning only if two users edit the same section?

 Thanks!


 To be sure, I did some tests here:

 http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Sandbox

 no warnings, you can even edit the same section but then you'll need to 
 get through the merge phase. In that
 case you see such a message:

 Someone else has changed this page since you started editing it. The 
 upper text area contains the page text
 as it currently exists. Your changes are shown in the lower text area. 
 You will have to merge your changes
 into the existing text.




 Well, I don't see this blocking behaviour working with MediaWiki
 sandbox... I don't know why! In any case, MediaWiki is not the case here!

 Just summing up:


 Thanks for that summary, let me comment on your thoughts:



 1. Simultaneous edition is possible, but not advisable with the current
 XWiki release.


 Yes, especially that there is no merge phase after concurrent editing ( or 
 maybe there is a 'merge plugin' -
 I'd be grateful for any info on that ). In that case you end up with the 
 article content overridden by
 someone else and your only hope is to dig in the document's history and try 
 to fix edits manually.


 2. Locking is done at document level.


 Is that going to change in the future ? In my opinion that basically blocks 
 user groups/communities from
 working on the documents in a collaborative way. Is it much work to make 
 that lock 'section sensitive',
 architecture-wise ?  If someone could describe what should be done / 
 changed in order to achieve that, maybe
 we could figure out a solution for that issue.



 3. A true real-time edition editor for XWiki is on its way and will
 solve all these issues!


 Well, it could be, but it's based on the js/ajax - it could be tricky to 
 achieve a good level of
 compatibility between browsers ( of course it could be done, Google docs is 
 a good example here ). Of course
 I'd take that right away in the stable form. But I think merging/lock on 
 the section level could be more
 than enough for the ordinary wiki users ( Wikipedia is basing on that model 
 on a huge scale and it's doing
 fine ;) )


 It will be great if some developer or more skilled user could review
 this statements to confirm/deny/complete them! Thanks!


 I concur. Currently I'm struggling to figure out how to get over that 
 problem. I can tell my users just to
 ignore the lock message, but that is not super safe and could cause a 
 content loss/corruption.

 Looking forward to your feedback guys !


 I do agree with you, Piotr. In fact, when I present XWiki to a new group
 of users, this is the question I would like to avoid: how XWiki manage
 concurrent edition?

 I talk about locking behaviour and a future real-time editor, but this
 is not a good answer at all. To use 

Re: [xwiki-users] This object is currently locked by - section editing

2010-11-15 Thread Piotr Dziubecki


W dniu 10-11-15 11:34, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
 On 11/15/2010 11:23 AM, Piotr Dziubecki wrote:


 W dniu 10-11-13 09:50, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote:


 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:
 W dniu 10-11-04 21:28, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:

 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:

 W dniu 10-11-04 12:13, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:


 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:


 Hi :)


 W dniu 10-11-04 11:08, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:



 Hi!

 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:



 Hello :)

 I configured my XWiki instance in the following way:



 #-# This parameter will activate the sectional editing.
 xwiki.section.edit=1

 #-# This parameter controls the depth of sections that have section 
 editing.
 #-# By default level 1 and level 2 sections have section editing.
 xwiki.section.depth=6


 I have many users working on documents simultaneously and in order 
 to minimize document locking and possible
 merging I encourage them to edit sections/paragraphs instead. I 
 noticed that when, for instance, two users
 edit different sections within the same page, the latter gets the 
 message:

 This object is currently locked by user1

 I checked and it's possible to force editing and save both of 
 concurrent changes to that document, but the
 message itself is a bit confusing to the users. I'm asking if it's 
 possible to change xwiki configuration to
 not display that message when the users edit different paragraphs 
 within the same page ?



 To the best of my understanding locking is set a document level. So, 
 if
 any user edits a section, all other users will receive that message.

 I think what you are doing is a bit risky. I've had here some problems
 following the same problem. When an user received this message, 
 although
 she/he is editing only a section, there is no way of knowing if they 
 are
 in the same section or in a different one. Even more, if you edit a
 document using the same user at two different locations, you won't
 receive the locking message.



 Yes, I came from the Media Wiki and section editing is pretty popular 
 way of collaborative editing (
 avoiding the whole page locks ).


 I also arrives to XWiki from MediaWiki years ago. So, with the current
 MediaWiki release, is it possible to do section edition and get a
 warning only if two users edit the same section?

 Thanks!


 To be sure, I did some tests here:

 http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Sandbox

 no warnings, you can even edit the same section but then you'll need to 
 get through the merge phase. In that
 case you see such a message:

 Someone else has changed this page since you started editing it. The 
 upper text area contains the page text
 as it currently exists. Your changes are shown in the lower text area. 
 You will have to merge your changes
 into the existing text.




 Well, I don't see this blocking behaviour working with MediaWiki
 sandbox... I don't know why! In any case, MediaWiki is not the case here!

 Just summing up:


 Thanks for that summary, let me comment on your thoughts:



 1. Simultaneous edition is possible, but not advisable with the current
 XWiki release.


 Yes, especially that there is no merge phase after concurrent editing ( or 
 maybe there is a 'merge plugin' -
 I'd be grateful for any info on that ). In that case you end up with the 
 article content overridden by
 someone else and your only hope is to dig in the document's history and 
 try to fix edits manually.


 2. Locking is done at document level.


 Is that going to change in the future ? In my opinion that basically 
 blocks user groups/communities from
 working on the documents in a collaborative way. Is it much work to make 
 that lock 'section sensitive',
 architecture-wise ?  If someone could describe what should be done / 
 changed in order to achieve that, maybe
 we could figure out a solution for that issue.



 3. A true real-time edition editor for XWiki is on its way and will
 solve all these issues!


 Well, it could be, but it's based on the js/ajax - it could be tricky to 
 achieve a good level of
 compatibility between browsers ( of course it could be done, Google docs 
 is a good example here ). Of course
 I'd take that right away in the stable form. But I think merging/lock on 
 the section level could be more
 than enough for the ordinary wiki users ( Wikipedia is basing on that 
 model on a huge scale and it's doing
 fine ;) )


 It will be great if some developer or more skilled user could review
 this statements to confirm/deny/complete them! Thanks!


 I concur. Currently I'm struggling to figure out how to get over that 
 problem. I can tell my users just to
 ignore the lock message, but that is not super safe and could cause a 
 content loss/corruption.

 Looking forward to your feedback guys !


 I do agree with you, Piotr. In fact, when I present XWiki to a new group
 of users, this is the question I would like to avoid: how XWiki manage
 concurrent edition?

 I talk about locking behaviour and a future real-time 

Re: [xwiki-users] This object is currently locked by - section editing

2010-11-15 Thread Sergiu Dumitriu
On 11/15/2010 12:03 PM, Piotr Dziubecki wrote:


 W dniu 10-11-15 11:34, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
 On 11/15/2010 11:23 AM, Piotr Dziubecki wrote:


 W dniu 10-11-13 09:50, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote:


 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:
 W dniu 10-11-04 21:28, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:

 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:

 W dniu 10-11-04 12:13, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:


 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:


 Hi :)


 W dniu 10-11-04 11:08, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:



 Hi!

 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:



 Hello :)

 I configured my XWiki instance in the following way:



 #-# This parameter will activate the sectional editing.
 xwiki.section.edit=1

 #-# This parameter controls the depth of sections that have section 
 editing.
 #-# By default level 1 and level 2 sections have section editing.
 xwiki.section.depth=6


 I have many users working on documents simultaneously and in order 
 to minimize document locking and possible
 merging I encourage them to edit sections/paragraphs instead. I 
 noticed that when, for instance, two users
 edit different sections within the same page, the latter gets the 
 message:

 This object is currently locked by user1

 I checked and it's possible to force editing and save both of 
 concurrent changes to that document, but the
 message itself is a bit confusing to the users. I'm asking if it's 
 possible to change xwiki configuration to
 not display that message when the users edit different paragraphs 
 within the same page ?



 To the best of my understanding locking is set a document level. So, 
 if
 any user edits a section, all other users will receive that message.

 I think what you are doing is a bit risky. I've had here some 
 problems
 following the same problem. When an user received this message, 
 although
 she/he is editing only a section, there is no way of knowing if they 
 are
 in the same section or in a different one. Even more, if you edit a
 document using the same user at two different locations, you won't
 receive the locking message.



 Yes, I came from the Media Wiki and section editing is pretty popular 
 way of collaborative editing (
 avoiding the whole page locks ).


 I also arrives to XWiki from MediaWiki years ago. So, with the current
 MediaWiki release, is it possible to do section edition and get a
 warning only if two users edit the same section?

 Thanks!


 To be sure, I did some tests here:

 http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Sandbox

 no warnings, you can even edit the same section but then you'll need to 
 get through the merge phase. In that
 case you see such a message:

 Someone else has changed this page since you started editing it. The 
 upper text area contains the page text
 as it currently exists. Your changes are shown in the lower text area. 
 You will have to merge your changes
 into the existing text.




 Well, I don't see this blocking behaviour working with MediaWiki
 sandbox... I don't know why! In any case, MediaWiki is not the case here!

 Just summing up:


 Thanks for that summary, let me comment on your thoughts:



 1. Simultaneous edition is possible, but not advisable with the current
 XWiki release.


 Yes, especially that there is no merge phase after concurrent editing ( 
 or maybe there is a 'merge plugin' -
 I'd be grateful for any info on that ). In that case you end up with the 
 article content overridden by
 someone else and your only hope is to dig in the document's history and 
 try to fix edits manually.


 2. Locking is done at document level.


 Is that going to change in the future ? In my opinion that basically 
 blocks user groups/communities from
 working on the documents in a collaborative way. Is it much work to make 
 that lock 'section sensitive',
 architecture-wise ?  If someone could describe what should be done / 
 changed in order to achieve that, maybe
 we could figure out a solution for that issue.



 3. A true real-time edition editor for XWiki is on its way and will
 solve all these issues!


 Well, it could be, but it's based on the js/ajax - it could be tricky to 
 achieve a good level of
 compatibility between browsers ( of course it could be done, Google docs 
 is a good example here ). Of course
 I'd take that right away in the stable form. But I think merging/lock on 
 the section level could be more
 than enough for the ordinary wiki users ( Wikipedia is basing on that 
 model on a huge scale and it's doing
 fine ;) )


 It will be great if some developer or more skilled user could review
 this statements to confirm/deny/complete them! Thanks!


 I concur. Currently I'm struggling to figure out how to get over that 
 problem. I can tell my users just to
 ignore the lock message, but that is not super safe and could cause a 
 content loss/corruption.

 Looking forward to your feedback guys !


 I do agree with you, Piotr. In fact, when I present XWiki to a new group
 of users, this is the question I would like to avoid: how XWiki manage
 concurrent edition?

 I talk 

Re: [xwiki-users] This object is currently locked by - section editing

2010-11-15 Thread Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.]


Piotr Dziubecki wrote:
 W dniu 10-11-13 09:50, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote:
   
 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:
 
 W dniu 10-11-04 21:28, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:

   
 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:

 
 W dniu 10-11-04 12:13, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:


   
 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:


 
 Hi :)


 W dniu 10-11-04 11:08, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:



   
 Hi!

 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:



 
 Hello :)

 I configured my XWiki instance in the following way:



 #-# This parameter will activate the sectional editing.
 xwiki.section.edit=1

 #-# This parameter controls the depth of sections that have section 
 editing.
 #-# By default level 1 and level 2 sections have section editing.
 xwiki.section.depth=6


 I have many users working on documents simultaneously and in order to 
 minimize document locking and possible
 merging I encourage them to edit sections/paragraphs instead. I 
 noticed that when, for instance, two users
 edit different sections within the same page, the latter gets the 
 message:

 This object is currently locked by user1

 I checked and it's possible to force editing and save both of 
 concurrent changes to that document, but the
 message itself is a bit confusing to the users. I'm asking if it's 
 possible to change xwiki configuration to
 not display that message when the users edit different paragraphs 
 within the same page ?



   
 To the best of my understanding locking is set a document level. So, if
 any user edits a section, all other users will receive that message.

 I think what you are doing is a bit risky. I've had here some problems
 following the same problem. When an user received this message, 
 although
 she/he is editing only a section, there is no way of knowing if they 
 are
 in the same section or in a different one. Even more, if you edit a
 document using the same user at two different locations, you won't
 receive the locking message.



 
 Yes, I came from the Media Wiki and section editing is pretty popular 
 way of collaborative editing (
 avoiding the whole page locks ).


   
 I also arrives to XWiki from MediaWiki years ago. So, with the current
 MediaWiki release, is it possible to do section edition and get a
 warning only if two users edit the same section?

 Thanks!


 
 To be sure, I did some tests here:

 http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Sandbox

 no warnings, you can even edit the same section but then you'll need to 
 get through the merge phase. In that
 case you see such a message:

 Someone else has changed this page since you started editing it. The 
 upper text area contains the page text
 as it currently exists. Your changes are shown in the lower text area. 
 You will have to merge your changes
 into the existing text.




   
 Well, I don't see this blocking behaviour working with MediaWiki
 sandbox... I don't know why! In any case, MediaWiki is not the case here!

 Just summing up:

 
 Thanks for that summary, let me comment on your thoughts:



   
 1. Simultaneous edition is possible, but not advisable with the current
 XWiki release.

 
 Yes, especially that there is no merge phase after concurrent editing ( or 
 maybe there is a 'merge plugin' -
 I'd be grateful for any info on that ). In that case you end up with the 
 article content overridden by
 someone else and your only hope is to dig in the document's history and try 
 to fix edits manually.


   
 2. Locking is done at document level.

 
 Is that going to change in the future ? In my opinion that basically blocks 
 user groups/communities from
 working on the documents in a collaborative way. Is it much work to make 
 that lock 'section sensitive',
 architecture-wise ?  If someone could describe what should be done / 
 changed in order to achieve that, maybe
 we could figure out a solution for that issue.



   
 3. A true real-time edition editor for XWiki is on its way and will
 solve all these issues!

 
 Well, it could be, but it's based on the js/ajax - it could be tricky to 
 achieve a good level of
 compatibility between browsers ( of course it could be done, Google docs is 
 a good example here ). Of course
 I'd take that right away in the stable form. But I think merging/lock on 
 the section level could be more
 than enough for the ordinary wiki users ( Wikipedia is basing on that model 
 on a huge scale and it's doing
 fine ;) )


   
 It will be great if some developer or more skilled user could review
 this statements to confirm/deny/complete them! Thanks!

 
 I concur. Currently I'm struggling to figure out how to get over that 
 problem. I can tell my users just to
 ignore the lock message, but that is not super safe and could cause a 
 content loss/corruption.

 Looking forward to your feedback guys !

   
 I do agree with you, Piotr. In fact, when I present 

Re: [xwiki-users] This object is currently locked by - section editing

2010-11-15 Thread Piotr Dziubecki


W dniu 10-11-15 12:14, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
 On 11/15/2010 12:03 PM, Piotr Dziubecki wrote:


 W dniu 10-11-15 11:34, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
 On 11/15/2010 11:23 AM, Piotr Dziubecki wrote:


 W dniu 10-11-13 09:50, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote:


 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:
 W dniu 10-11-04 21:28, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:

 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:

 W dniu 10-11-04 12:13, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:


 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:


 Hi :)


 W dniu 10-11-04 11:08, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:



 Hi!

 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:



 Hello :)

 I configured my XWiki instance in the following way:



 #-# This parameter will activate the sectional editing.
 xwiki.section.edit=1

 #-# This parameter controls the depth of sections that have 
 section editing.
 #-# By default level 1 and level 2 sections have section editing.
 xwiki.section.depth=6


 I have many users working on documents simultaneously and in order 
 to minimize document locking and possible
 merging I encourage them to edit sections/paragraphs instead. I 
 noticed that when, for instance, two users
 edit different sections within the same page, the latter gets the 
 message:

 This object is currently locked by user1

 I checked and it's possible to force editing and save both of 
 concurrent changes to that document, but the
 message itself is a bit confusing to the users. I'm asking if it's 
 possible to change xwiki configuration to
 not display that message when the users edit different paragraphs 
 within the same page ?



 To the best of my understanding locking is set a document level. 
 So, if
 any user edits a section, all other users will receive that message.

 I think what you are doing is a bit risky. I've had here some 
 problems
 following the same problem. When an user received this message, 
 although
 she/he is editing only a section, there is no way of knowing if 
 they are
 in the same section or in a different one. Even more, if you edit a
 document using the same user at two different locations, you won't
 receive the locking message.



 Yes, I came from the Media Wiki and section editing is pretty 
 popular way of collaborative editing (
 avoiding the whole page locks ).


 I also arrives to XWiki from MediaWiki years ago. So, with the current
 MediaWiki release, is it possible to do section edition and get a
 warning only if two users edit the same section?

 Thanks!


 To be sure, I did some tests here:

 http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Sandbox

 no warnings, you can even edit the same section but then you'll need 
 to get through the merge phase. In that
 case you see such a message:

 Someone else has changed this page since you started editing it. The 
 upper text area contains the page text
 as it currently exists. Your changes are shown in the lower text area. 
 You will have to merge your changes
 into the existing text.




 Well, I don't see this blocking behaviour working with MediaWiki
 sandbox... I don't know why! In any case, MediaWiki is not the case 
 here!

 Just summing up:


 Thanks for that summary, let me comment on your thoughts:



 1. Simultaneous edition is possible, but not advisable with the current
 XWiki release.


 Yes, especially that there is no merge phase after concurrent editing ( 
 or maybe there is a 'merge plugin' -
 I'd be grateful for any info on that ). In that case you end up with the 
 article content overridden by
 someone else and your only hope is to dig in the document's history and 
 try to fix edits manually.


 2. Locking is done at document level.


 Is that going to change in the future ? In my opinion that basically 
 blocks user groups/communities from
 working on the documents in a collaborative way. Is it much work to make 
 that lock 'section sensitive',
 architecture-wise ?  If someone could describe what should be done / 
 changed in order to achieve that, maybe
 we could figure out a solution for that issue.



 3. A true real-time edition editor for XWiki is on its way and will
 solve all these issues!


 Well, it could be, but it's based on the js/ajax - it could be tricky to 
 achieve a good level of
 compatibility between browsers ( of course it could be done, Google docs 
 is a good example here ). Of course
 I'd take that right away in the stable form. But I think merging/lock on 
 the section level could be more
 than enough for the ordinary wiki users ( Wikipedia is basing on that 
 model on a huge scale and it's doing
 fine ;) )


 It will be great if some developer or more skilled user could review
 this statements to confirm/deny/complete them! Thanks!


 I concur. Currently I'm struggling to figure out how to get over that 
 problem. I can tell my users just to
 ignore the lock message, but that is not super safe and could cause a 
 content loss/corruption.

 Looking forward to your feedback guys !


 I do agree with you, Piotr. In fact, when I present XWiki to a new group
 of users, this is the question I would like to 

Re: [xwiki-users] This object is currently locked by - section editing

2010-11-15 Thread Piotr Dziubecki


W dniu 10-11-15 14:18, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote:


 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:
 W dniu 10-11-13 09:50, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote:

 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:

 W dniu 10-11-04 21:28, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:


 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:


 W dniu 10-11-04 12:13, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:



 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:



 Hi :)


 W dniu 10-11-04 11:08, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:




 Hi!

 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:




 Hello :)

 I configured my XWiki instance in the following way:



 #-# This parameter will activate the sectional editing.
 xwiki.section.edit=1

 #-# This parameter controls the depth of sections that have section 
 editing.
 #-# By default level 1 and level 2 sections have section editing.
 xwiki.section.depth=6


 I have many users working on documents simultaneously and in order 
 to minimize document locking and possible
 merging I encourage them to edit sections/paragraphs instead. I 
 noticed that when, for instance, two users
 edit different sections within the same page, the latter gets the 
 message:

 This object is currently locked by user1

 I checked and it's possible to force editing and save both of 
 concurrent changes to that document, but the
 message itself is a bit confusing to the users. I'm asking if it's 
 possible to change xwiki configuration to
 not display that message when the users edit different paragraphs 
 within the same page ?




 To the best of my understanding locking is set a document level. So, 
 if
 any user edits a section, all other users will receive that message.

 I think what you are doing is a bit risky. I've had here some problems
 following the same problem. When an user received this message, 
 although
 she/he is editing only a section, there is no way of knowing if they 
 are
 in the same section or in a different one. Even more, if you edit a
 document using the same user at two different locations, you won't
 receive the locking message.




 Yes, I came from the Media Wiki and section editing is pretty popular 
 way of collaborative editing (
 avoiding the whole page locks ).



 I also arrives to XWiki from MediaWiki years ago. So, with the current
 MediaWiki release, is it possible to do section edition and get a
 warning only if two users edit the same section?

 Thanks!



 To be sure, I did some tests here:

 http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Sandbox

 no warnings, you can even edit the same section but then you'll need to 
 get through the merge phase. In that
 case you see such a message:

 Someone else has changed this page since you started editing it. The 
 upper text area contains the page text
 as it currently exists. Your changes are shown in the lower text area. 
 You will have to merge your changes
 into the existing text.





 Well, I don't see this blocking behaviour working with MediaWiki
 sandbox... I don't know why! In any case, MediaWiki is not the case here!

 Just summing up:


 Thanks for that summary, let me comment on your thoughts:




 1. Simultaneous edition is possible, but not advisable with the current
 XWiki release.


 Yes, especially that there is no merge phase after concurrent editing ( or 
 maybe there is a 'merge plugin' -
 I'd be grateful for any info on that ). In that case you end up with the 
 article content overridden by
 someone else and your only hope is to dig in the document's history and 
 try to fix edits manually.



 2. Locking is done at document level.


 Is that going to change in the future ? In my opinion that basically 
 blocks user groups/communities from
 working on the documents in a collaborative way. Is it much work to make 
 that lock 'section sensitive',
 architecture-wise ?  If someone could describe what should be done / 
 changed in order to achieve that, maybe
 we could figure out a solution for that issue.




 3. A true real-time edition editor for XWiki is on its way and will
 solve all these issues!


 Well, it could be, but it's based on the js/ajax - it could be tricky to 
 achieve a good level of
 compatibility between browsers ( of course it could be done, Google docs 
 is a good example here ). Of course
 I'd take that right away in the stable form. But I think merging/lock on 
 the section level could be more
 than enough for the ordinary wiki users ( Wikipedia is basing on that 
 model on a huge scale and it's doing
 fine ;) )



 It will be great if some developer or more skilled user could review
 this statements to confirm/deny/complete them! Thanks!


 I concur. Currently I'm struggling to figure out how to get over that 
 problem. I can tell my users just to
 ignore the lock message, but that is not super safe and could cause a 
 content loss/corruption.

 Looking forward to your feedback guys !


 I do agree with you, Piotr. In fact, when I present XWiki to a new group
 of users, this is the question I would like to avoid: how XWiki manage
 concurrent edition?

 I talk about locking behaviour and a future real-time 

Re: [xwiki-users] This object is currently locked by - section editing

2010-11-13 Thread Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.]


Piotr Dziubecki wrote:
 W dniu 10-11-04 21:28, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:
   
 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:
 
 W dniu 10-11-04 12:13, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:

   
 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:

 
 Hi :)


 W dniu 10-11-04 11:08, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:


   
 Hi!

 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:


 
 Hello :)

 I configured my XWiki instance in the following way:



 #-# This parameter will activate the sectional editing.
 xwiki.section.edit=1

 #-# This parameter controls the depth of sections that have section 
 editing.
 #-# By default level 1 and level 2 sections have section editing.
 xwiki.section.depth=6


 I have many users working on documents simultaneously and in order to 
 minimize document locking and possible
 merging I encourage them to edit sections/paragraphs instead. I noticed 
 that when, for instance, two users
 edit different sections within the same page, the latter gets the 
 message:

 This object is currently locked by user1

 I checked and it's possible to force editing and save both of 
 concurrent changes to that document, but the
 message itself is a bit confusing to the users. I'm asking if it's 
 possible to change xwiki configuration to
 not display that message when the users edit different paragraphs 
 within the same page ?


   
 To the best of my understanding locking is set a document level. So, if
 any user edits a section, all other users will receive that message.

 I think what you are doing is a bit risky. I've had here some problems
 following the same problem. When an user received this message, although
 she/he is editing only a section, there is no way of knowing if they are
 in the same section or in a different one. Even more, if you edit a
 document using the same user at two different locations, you won't
 receive the locking message.


 
 Yes, I came from the Media Wiki and section editing is pretty popular way 
 of collaborative editing (
 avoiding the whole page locks ).

   
 I also arrives to XWiki from MediaWiki years ago. So, with the current
 MediaWiki release, is it possible to do section edition and get a
 warning only if two users edit the same section?

 Thanks!

 
 To be sure, I did some tests here:

 http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Sandbox

 no warnings, you can even edit the same section but then you'll need to get 
 through the merge phase. In that
 case you see such a message:

 Someone else has changed this page since you started editing it. The upper 
 text area contains the page text
 as it currently exists. Your changes are shown in the lower text area. You 
 will have to merge your changes
 into the existing text.



   
 Well, I don't see this blocking behaviour working with MediaWiki
 sandbox... I don't know why! In any case, MediaWiki is not the case here!

 Just summing up:
 

 Thanks for that summary, let me comment on your thoughts:


   
 1. Simultaneous edition is possible, but not advisable with the current
 XWiki release.
 

 Yes, especially that there is no merge phase after concurrent editing ( or 
 maybe there is a 'merge plugin' - 
 I'd be grateful for any info on that ). In that case you end up with the 
 article content overridden by 
 someone else and your only hope is to dig in the document's history and try 
 to fix edits manually.

   
 2. Locking is done at document level.
 

 Is that going to change in the future ? In my opinion that basically blocks 
 user groups/communities from 
 working on the documents in a collaborative way. Is it much work to make that 
 lock 'section sensitive', 
 architecture-wise ?  If someone could describe what should be done / changed 
 in order to achieve that, maybe 
 we could figure out a solution for that issue.


   
 3. A true real-time edition editor for XWiki is on its way and will
 solve all these issues!
 

 Well, it could be, but it's based on the js/ajax - it could be tricky to 
 achieve a good level of 
 compatibility between browsers ( of course it could be done, Google docs is a 
 good example here ). Of course 
 I'd take that right away in the stable form. But I think merging/lock on the 
 section level could be more 
 than enough for the ordinary wiki users ( Wikipedia is basing on that model 
 on a huge scale and it's doing 
 fine ;) )

   
 It will be great if some developer or more skilled user could review
 this statements to confirm/deny/complete them! Thanks!
 

 I concur. Currently I'm struggling to figure out how to get over that 
 problem. I can tell my users just to 
 ignore the lock message, but that is not super safe and could cause a content 
 loss/corruption.

 Looking forward to your feedback guys !
   

I do agree with you, Piotr. In fact, when I present XWiki to a new group 
of users, this is the question I would like to avoid: how XWiki manage 
concurrent edition?

I talk about locking behaviour and a future real-time editor, but this 

Re: [xwiki-users] This object is currently locked by - section editing

2010-11-12 Thread Piotr Dziubecki


W dniu 10-11-04 21:28, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:


 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:
 W dniu 10-11-04 12:13, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:

 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:

 Hi :)


 W dniu 10-11-04 11:08, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:


 Hi!

 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:


 Hello :)

 I configured my XWiki instance in the following way:



 #-# This parameter will activate the sectional editing.
 xwiki.section.edit=1

 #-# This parameter controls the depth of sections that have section 
 editing.
 #-# By default level 1 and level 2 sections have section editing.
 xwiki.section.depth=6


 I have many users working on documents simultaneously and in order to 
 minimize document locking and possible
 merging I encourage them to edit sections/paragraphs instead. I noticed 
 that when, for instance, two users
 edit different sections within the same page, the latter gets the 
 message:

 This object is currently locked by user1

 I checked and it's possible to force editing and save both of concurrent 
 changes to that document, but the
 message itself is a bit confusing to the users. I'm asking if it's 
 possible to change xwiki configuration to
 not display that message when the users edit different paragraphs within 
 the same page ?


 To the best of my understanding locking is set a document level. So, if
 any user edits a section, all other users will receive that message.

 I think what you are doing is a bit risky. I've had here some problems
 following the same problem. When an user received this message, although
 she/he is editing only a section, there is no way of knowing if they are
 in the same section or in a different one. Even more, if you edit a
 document using the same user at two different locations, you won't
 receive the locking message.


 Yes, I came from the Media Wiki and section editing is pretty popular way 
 of collaborative editing (
 avoiding the whole page locks ).

 I also arrives to XWiki from MediaWiki years ago. So, with the current
 MediaWiki release, is it possible to do section edition and get a
 warning only if two users edit the same section?

 Thanks!


 To be sure, I did some tests here:

 http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Sandbox

 no warnings, you can even edit the same section but then you'll need to get 
 through the merge phase. In that
 case you see such a message:

 Someone else has changed this page since you started editing it. The upper 
 text area contains the page text
 as it currently exists. Your changes are shown in the lower text area. You 
 will have to merge your changes
 into the existing text.




 Well, I don't see this blocking behaviour working with MediaWiki
 sandbox... I don't know why! In any case, MediaWiki is not the case here!

 Just summing up:

Thanks for that summary, let me comment on your thoughts:



 1. Simultaneous edition is possible, but not advisable with the current
 XWiki release.

Yes, especially that there is no merge phase after concurrent editing ( or 
maybe there is a 'merge plugin' - 
I'd be grateful for any info on that ). In that case you end up with the 
article content overridden by 
someone else and your only hope is to dig in the document's history and try to 
fix edits manually.

 2. Locking is done at document level.

Is that going to change in the future ? In my opinion that basically blocks 
user groups/communities from 
working on the documents in a collaborative way. Is it much work to make that 
lock 'section sensitive', 
architecture-wise ?  If someone could describe what should be done / changed in 
order to achieve that, maybe 
we could figure out a solution for that issue.


 3. A true real-time edition editor for XWiki is on its way and will
 solve all these issues!

Well, it could be, but it's based on the js/ajax - it could be tricky to 
achieve a good level of 
compatibility between browsers ( of course it could be done, Google docs is a 
good example here ). Of course 
I'd take that right away in the stable form. But I think merging/lock on the 
section level could be more 
than enough for the ordinary wiki users ( Wikipedia is basing on that model on 
a huge scale and it's doing 
fine ;) )


 It will be great if some developer or more skilled user could review
 this statements to confirm/deny/complete them! Thanks!

I concur. Currently I'm struggling to figure out how to get over that problem. 
I can tell my users just to 
ignore the lock message, but that is not super safe and could cause a content 
loss/corruption.

Looking forward to your feedback guys !

Regards,
Piotr


___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] This object is currently locked by - section editing

2010-11-04 Thread [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC.
Hi!

Piotr Dziubecki wrote:
 Hello :)

 I configured my XWiki instance in the following way:



 #-# This parameter will activate the sectional editing.
 xwiki.section.edit=1

 #-# This parameter controls the depth of sections that have section editing.
 #-# By default level 1 and level 2 sections have section editing.
 xwiki.section.depth=6


 I have many users working on documents simultaneously and in order to 
 minimize document locking and possible 
 merging I encourage them to edit sections/paragraphs instead. I noticed that 
 when, for instance, two users 
 edit different sections within the same page, the latter gets the message:

 This object is currently locked by user1

 I checked and it's possible to force editing and save both of concurrent 
 changes to that document, but the 
 message itself is a bit confusing to the users. I'm asking if it's possible 
 to change xwiki configuration to 
 not display that message when the users edit different paragraphs within the 
 same page ?

To the best of my understanding locking is set a document level. So, if 
any user edits a section, all other users will receive that message.

I think what you are doing is a bit risky. I've had here some problems 
following the same problem. When an user received this message, although 
she/he is editing only a section, there is no way of knowing if they are 
in the same section or in a different one. Even more, if you edit a 
document using the same user at two different locations, you won't 
receive the locking message.

But the solution to this situation is on its way! Are you aware of this?

http://markmail.org/thread/erlky73x5np3gllh

Hope this helps!

Ricardo

-- 
Ricardo Rodríguez
CTO
eBioTIC.
Life Sciences, Data Modeling and Information Management Systems

___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] This object is currently locked by - section editing

2010-11-04 Thread Piotr Dziubecki
Hi :)


W dniu 10-11-04 11:08, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:
 Hi!

 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:
 Hello :)

 I configured my XWiki instance in the following way:



 #-# This parameter will activate the sectional editing.
 xwiki.section.edit=1

 #-# This parameter controls the depth of sections that have section editing.
 #-# By default level 1 and level 2 sections have section editing.
 xwiki.section.depth=6


 I have many users working on documents simultaneously and in order to 
 minimize document locking and possible
 merging I encourage them to edit sections/paragraphs instead. I noticed that 
 when, for instance, two users
 edit different sections within the same page, the latter gets the message:

 This object is currently locked by user1

 I checked and it's possible to force editing and save both of concurrent 
 changes to that document, but the
 message itself is a bit confusing to the users. I'm asking if it's possible 
 to change xwiki configuration to
 not display that message when the users edit different paragraphs within the 
 same page ?

 To the best of my understanding locking is set a document level. So, if
 any user edits a section, all other users will receive that message.

 I think what you are doing is a bit risky. I've had here some problems
 following the same problem. When an user received this message, although
 she/he is editing only a section, there is no way of knowing if they are
 in the same section or in a different one. Even more, if you edit a
 document using the same user at two different locations, you won't
 receive the locking message.

Yes, I came from the Media Wiki and section editing is pretty popular way of 
collaborative editing ( 
avoiding the whole page locks ). In fact it was one of the reason I've chosen 
XWiki ( possibility to edit 
sections ). In my case, it could happen that several people work on the same 
document at once, so sections 
could preserve the separation of their work.


 But the solution to this situation is on its way! Are you aware of this?

 http://markmail.org/thread/erlky73x5np3gllh

That is really interesting, will try it if that's possible.


 Hope this helps!

 Ricardo


Thank you Ricardo !

Regards,
Piotr
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] This object is currently locked by - section editing

2010-11-04 Thread [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC.


Piotr Dziubecki wrote:
 Hi :)


 W dniu 10-11-04 11:08, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:
   
 Hi!

 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:
 
 Hello :)

 I configured my XWiki instance in the following way:



 #-# This parameter will activate the sectional editing.
 xwiki.section.edit=1

 #-# This parameter controls the depth of sections that have section editing.
 #-# By default level 1 and level 2 sections have section editing.
 xwiki.section.depth=6


 I have many users working on documents simultaneously and in order to 
 minimize document locking and possible
 merging I encourage them to edit sections/paragraphs instead. I noticed 
 that when, for instance, two users
 edit different sections within the same page, the latter gets the message:

 This object is currently locked by user1

 I checked and it's possible to force editing and save both of concurrent 
 changes to that document, but the
 message itself is a bit confusing to the users. I'm asking if it's possible 
 to change xwiki configuration to
 not display that message when the users edit different paragraphs within 
 the same page ?
   
 To the best of my understanding locking is set a document level. So, if
 any user edits a section, all other users will receive that message.

 I think what you are doing is a bit risky. I've had here some problems
 following the same problem. When an user received this message, although
 she/he is editing only a section, there is no way of knowing if they are
 in the same section or in a different one. Even more, if you edit a
 document using the same user at two different locations, you won't
 receive the locking message.
 

 Yes, I came from the Media Wiki and section editing is pretty popular way of 
 collaborative editing ( 
 avoiding the whole page locks ).

I also arrives to XWiki from MediaWiki years ago. So, with the current 
MediaWiki release, is it possible to do section edition and get a 
warning only if two users edit the same section?

Thanks!

 In fact it was one of the reason I've chosen XWiki ( possibility to edit 
 sections ). In my case, it could happen that several people work on the same 
 document at once, so sections 
 could preserve the separation of their work.

   
 But the solution to this situation is on its way! Are you aware of this?

 http://markmail.org/thread/erlky73x5np3gllh
 

 That is really interesting, will try it if that's possible.

   
 Hope this helps!

 Ricardo

 

 Thank you Ricardo !

 Regards,
 Piotr
 ___
 users mailing list
 users@xwiki.org
 http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

   

-- 
Ricardo Rodríguez
CTO
eBioTIC.
Life Sciences, Data Modeling and Information Management Systems

___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] This object is currently locked by - section editing

2010-11-04 Thread Piotr Dziubecki


W dniu 10-11-04 12:13, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:


 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:
 Hi :)


 W dniu 10-11-04 11:08, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:

 Hi!

 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:

 Hello :)

 I configured my XWiki instance in the following way:



 #-# This parameter will activate the sectional editing.
 xwiki.section.edit=1

 #-# This parameter controls the depth of sections that have section 
 editing.
 #-# By default level 1 and level 2 sections have section editing.
 xwiki.section.depth=6


 I have many users working on documents simultaneously and in order to 
 minimize document locking and possible
 merging I encourage them to edit sections/paragraphs instead. I noticed 
 that when, for instance, two users
 edit different sections within the same page, the latter gets the message:

 This object is currently locked by user1

 I checked and it's possible to force editing and save both of concurrent 
 changes to that document, but the
 message itself is a bit confusing to the users. I'm asking if it's 
 possible to change xwiki configuration to
 not display that message when the users edit different paragraphs within 
 the same page ?

 To the best of my understanding locking is set a document level. So, if
 any user edits a section, all other users will receive that message.

 I think what you are doing is a bit risky. I've had here some problems
 following the same problem. When an user received this message, although
 she/he is editing only a section, there is no way of knowing if they are
 in the same section or in a different one. Even more, if you edit a
 document using the same user at two different locations, you won't
 receive the locking message.


 Yes, I came from the Media Wiki and section editing is pretty popular way of 
 collaborative editing (
 avoiding the whole page locks ).

 I also arrives to XWiki from MediaWiki years ago. So, with the current
 MediaWiki release, is it possible to do section edition and get a
 warning only if two users edit the same section?

 Thanks!

To be sure, I did some tests here:

http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Sandbox

no warnings, you can even edit the same section but then you'll need to get 
through the merge phase. In that 
case you see such a message:

Someone else has changed this page since you started editing it. The upper text 
area contains the page text 
as it currently exists. Your changes are shown in the lower text area. You will 
have to merge your changes 
into the existing text.


Cheers,
Piotr



 In fact it was one of the reason I've chosen XWiki ( possibility to edit
 sections ). In my case, it could happen that several people work on the same 
 document at once, so sections
 could preserve the separation of their work.


 But the solution to this situation is on its way! Are you aware of this?

 http://markmail.org/thread/erlky73x5np3gllh


 That is really interesting, will try it if that's possible.


 Hope this helps!

 Ricardo



 Thank you Ricardo !

 Regards,
 Piotr
 ___
 users mailing list
 users@xwiki.org
 http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users



___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] This object is currently locked by - section editing

2010-11-04 Thread [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC.


Piotr Dziubecki wrote:
 W dniu 10-11-04 12:13, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:
   
 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:
 
 Hi :)


 W dniu 10-11-04 11:08, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:

   
 Hi!

 Piotr Dziubecki wrote:

 
 Hello :)

 I configured my XWiki instance in the following way:



 #-# This parameter will activate the sectional editing.
 xwiki.section.edit=1

 #-# This parameter controls the depth of sections that have section 
 editing.
 #-# By default level 1 and level 2 sections have section editing.
 xwiki.section.depth=6


 I have many users working on documents simultaneously and in order to 
 minimize document locking and possible
 merging I encourage them to edit sections/paragraphs instead. I noticed 
 that when, for instance, two users
 edit different sections within the same page, the latter gets the message:

 This object is currently locked by user1

 I checked and it's possible to force editing and save both of concurrent 
 changes to that document, but the
 message itself is a bit confusing to the users. I'm asking if it's 
 possible to change xwiki configuration to
 not display that message when the users edit different paragraphs within 
 the same page ?

   
 To the best of my understanding locking is set a document level. So, if
 any user edits a section, all other users will receive that message.

 I think what you are doing is a bit risky. I've had here some problems
 following the same problem. When an user received this message, although
 she/he is editing only a section, there is no way of knowing if they are
 in the same section or in a different one. Even more, if you edit a
 document using the same user at two different locations, you won't
 receive the locking message.

 
 Yes, I came from the Media Wiki and section editing is pretty popular way 
 of collaborative editing (
 avoiding the whole page locks ).
   
 I also arrives to XWiki from MediaWiki years ago. So, with the current
 MediaWiki release, is it possible to do section edition and get a
 warning only if two users edit the same section?

 Thanks!
 

 To be sure, I did some tests here:

 http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Sandbox

 no warnings, you can even edit the same section but then you'll need to get 
 through the merge phase. In that 
 case you see such a message:

 Someone else has changed this page since you started editing it. The upper 
 text area contains the page text 
 as it currently exists. Your changes are shown in the lower text area. You 
 will have to merge your changes 
 into the existing text.


   

Well, I don't see this blocking behaviour working with MediaWiki 
sandbox... I don't know why! In any case, MediaWiki is not the case here!

Just summing up:

1. Simultaneous edition is possible, but not advisable with the current 
XWiki release.
2. Locking is done at document level.
3. A true real-time edition editor for XWiki is on its way and will 
solve all these issues!

It will be great if some developer or more skilled user could review 
this statements to confirm/deny/complete them! Thanks!


   
 In fact it was one of the reason I've chosen XWiki ( possibility to edit
 sections ). In my case, it could happen that several people work on the 
 same document at once, so sections
 could preserve the separation of their work.


   
 But the solution to this situation is on its way! Are you aware of this?

 http://markmail.org/thread/erlky73x5np3gllh

 
 That is really interesting, will try it if that's possible.


   
 Hope this helps!

 Ricardo


 
 Thank you Ricardo !

 Regards,
 Piotr
 ___
 users mailing list
 users@xwiki.org
 http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


   
 ___
 users mailing list
 users@xwiki.org
 http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

   

Ricardo

-- 
Ricardo Rodríguez
CTO
eBioTIC.
Life Sciences, Data Modeling and Information Management Systems

___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[xwiki-users] This object is currently locked by - section editing

2010-11-03 Thread Piotr Dziubecki
Hello :)

I configured my XWiki instance in the following way:



#-# This parameter will activate the sectional editing.
xwiki.section.edit=1

#-# This parameter controls the depth of sections that have section editing.
#-# By default level 1 and level 2 sections have section editing.
xwiki.section.depth=6


I have many users working on documents simultaneously and in order to minimize 
document locking and possible 
merging I encourage them to edit sections/paragraphs instead. I noticed that 
when, for instance, two users 
edit different sections within the same page, the latter gets the message:

This object is currently locked by user1

I checked and it's possible to force editing and save both of concurrent 
changes to that document, but the 
message itself is a bit confusing to the users. I'm asking if it's possible to 
change xwiki configuration to 
not display that message when the users edit different paragraphs within the 
same page ?

Regards,
Piotr
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users