Re: [VOTE] Revert Shell Interpreter

2024-04-29 Thread Bill Brooks
+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Bill On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 5:21 AM Jongyoul Lee wrote: > Hello community, > > I propose the vote for reverting Shell interpreter. > > Please check the discussion thread[1] before you participate in this vote. > > [] +1 Including Shell interpreter again in the next

Re: [DISCUSS] Shell interpreter

2024-04-12 Thread Bill Brooks
Hello, I went back and re-read the mailing list summary of CVE-2024-31861 before composing this message, and I still don't quite grasp what the reporter/finder of the alleged vulnerability thinks they found. I followed the links to the NVD at NIST, and didn't find any more substantive information

Re: A question about pull requests for updates to the web site

2023-09-11 Thread Bill Brooks
to make it easier for users to review the current code and > contribute more easily. > > Best regards, > Jongyoul > > 2023년 9월 9일 (토) 오전 12:33, Bill Brooks 님이 작성: > >> Hi Jongyoul, >> >> I am wrestling with getting Jekyll to generate the documentation website &g

Re: Beam interpreter

2021-12-23 Thread Bill Brooks
I have to second this sentiment. That is the beauty of open source development; if you believe that Beam (or any other software) is the future of streaming and it should be available inside notebooks, then you can direct your belief in productive ways by taking over maintenance of the associated

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 0.9.1

2021-07-05 Thread Bill Brooks
Jeff, Apologies if you already covered this on the slack channel, but I was wondering, for the proposed release: - how many accepted commits that have never reached any Apache zeppelin official release are outstanding? Thanks, Bill On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 7:46 AM Jeff Zhang wrote: > Hi Folks,

Re: [DISCUSS] Zeppelin community sync up meeting

2021-01-25 Thread Bill Brooks
This is a great idea, but I thought that Mei Long was already putting these events together and prior to the pandemic, they were happening. Bill On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 3:09 PM Jeff Zhang wrote: > > Hi folks (users & developers), > > I'd like to raise this discussion about regular community