Re: interactive code and security concern

2019-10-30 Thread Jeff Zhang
No, currently Zeppelin doesn't do anything on that. I believe it should be done by interpreter itself instead of relying on Zeppelin. Take livy as example, livy should protect that via enabling kerberos in yarn cluster. mhd wrk 于2019年10月31日周四 上午12:59写道： > Considering that Zeppelin (via Livy) sup

interactive code and security concern

2019-10-30 Thread mhd wrk
Considering that Zeppelin (via Livy) supports Interactive Scala code, does it provide any sand-boxing feature to protect the back-end against malicious code?