Re: note.json or interpreter.json format change?

2017-08-28 Thread Jeff Zhang
fixed. >> >> >> Best Regard, >> Jeff Zhang >> >> >> From: Ruslan Dautkhanov <dautkha...@gmail.com> >> Reply-To: "users@zeppelin.apache.org" <users@zeppelin.apache.org> >> Date: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 at 1:50 AM >> To: Zeppel

Re: note.json or interpreter.json format change?

2017-08-28 Thread Ruslan Dautkhanov
believe it has been fixed. > > > Best Regard, > Jeff Zhang > > > From: Ruslan Dautkhanov <dautkha...@gmail.com> > Reply-To: "users@zeppelin.apache.org" <users@zeppelin.apache.org> > Date: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 at 1:50 AM > To: Zeppelin Users

Re: note.json or interpreter.json format change?

2017-08-28 Thread Ruslan Dautkhanov
t; 19:56:22.229" > at java.text.DateFormat.parse(DateFormat.java:357) > at com.google.gson.internal.bind.DateTypeAdapter. > deserializeToDate(DateTypeAdapter.java:79) > ... 50 more > > > > > -- > Ruslan Dautkhanov > > On Mon, Aug

Re: note.json or interpreter.json format change?

2017-08-28 Thread Ruslan Dautkhanov
AM, Ruslan Dautkhanov <dautkha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Testing a newer Zeppelin version from yesterday's zeppelin snapshot. > Noticed it doesn't see majority of my notebooks. > Our previous Zeppelin version is ~end of April snapshot of Zeppelin. > Did the format of note.json

note.json or interpreter.json format change?

2017-08-28 Thread Ruslan Dautkhanov
Testing a newer Zeppelin version from yesterday's zeppelin snapshot. Noticed it doesn't see majority of my notebooks. Our previous Zeppelin version is ~end of April snapshot of Zeppelin. Did the format of note.json or interpreter.json expected format change in a way that made those note.json