t; I agree that it will help prolong RC period and use it actually. And also
>> we need code freeze for the new features and spend time to stabilize RC.
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> +1 on quality and stabilization.
>>
>
AFAIK, ETA is by end of July.
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 8:31 PM, mbatista wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What's the planned date for 0.8 Release?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-zeppelin-users-
>
Hi,
What's the planned date for 0.8 Release?
Thanks in advance.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-zeppelin-users-incubating-mailing-list.75479.x6.nabble.com/Roadmap-for-0-8-0-tp5243p5828.html
Sent from the Apache Zeppelin Users (incubating) mailing list mailing list
archive at
a critical compared to the above two, but it could complement
> the multi-tenancy feature very well.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Ruslan Dautkhanov
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> +1 with latest/stable.
>
>
>
&g
, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>> +1 with latest/stable.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *From:* moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org>
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 21, 2017 8:41
2017 at 11:29 AM, Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 with latest/stable.
>
>
>
>
> --
> *From:* moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 21, 2017 8:41:58 AM
> *To:* users@zeppelin.apache.org
yes,I think the Admin feature is necessary!
On 2017-03-20 12:03 (+0800), Jongyoul Lee wrote:
> Hi dev & users,
>
> Recently, community submits very new features for Apache Zeppelin. I think
> it's very positive signals to improve Apache Zeppelin and its community.
> But in
> Other projects have code freeze, RC (and longer RC iteration time) etc. -
> do we think those will help improve quality when the release is finally cut?
>
>
> _
> From: Jianfeng (Jeff) Zhang <jzh...@hortonworks.com>
> Sent: Monday, March
though.
Other projects have code freeze, RC (and longer RC iteration time) etc. - do we think those will help improve quality when the release is finally cut?
_
From: Jianfeng (Jeff) Zhang <jzh...@hortonworks.com>
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 6:13 PM
ng it unstable fits with the
> ASF release process though.
>
> Other projects have code freeze, RC (and longer RC iteration time) etc. -
> do we think those will help improve quality when the release is finally cut?
>
>
> _____
> From: Jianfeng (Jef
__
> From: Jianfeng (Jeff) Zhang <jzh...@hortonworks.com>
> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 6:13 PM
> Subject: Re: Roadmap for 0.8.0
> To: <users@zeppelin.apache.org>, dev <d...@zeppelin.apache.org>
>
>
>
> Strongly +1 for adding system test for different
?
_
From: Jianfeng (Jeff) Zhang
<jzh...@hortonworks.com<mailto:jzh...@hortonworks.com>>
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 6:13 PM
Subject: Re: Roadmap for 0.8.0
To: <users@zeppelin.apache.org<mailto:users@zeppelin.apache.org>>, dev
<d...@z
rg<mailto:users@zeppelin.apache.org>"
<users@zeppelin.apache.org<mailto:users@zeppelin.apache.org>>, dev
<d...@zeppelin.apache.org<mailto:d...@zeppelin.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: Roadmap for 0.8.0
Great to see discussion for 0.8.0.
List of features for 0.8.0 looks really go
m in as well.
>
>
> --
> *From:* Jongyoul Lee <jongy...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Sunday, March 19, 2017 9:03:24 PM
> *To:* dev; users@zeppelin.apache.org
> *Subject:* Roadmap for 0.8.0
>
> Hi dev & users,
>
> Recently, community submit
There are several pending visualization improvements/PRs that would be very
good to get them in as well.
From: Jongyoul Lee <jongy...@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2017 9:03:24 PM
To: dev; users@zeppelin.apache.org
Subject: Roadmap for 0.8.0
Hi dev &
Yeah, make sense.
Jongyoul Lee 于2017年3月20日周一 下午7:21写道:
> Thanks for letting me know. I agree almost things we should develop.
> Personally, concerning refactoring it, I'm doing a bit with several PRs but
> we need to restructure InterpreterFactory. At first, list up all
Thanks for letting me know. I agree almost things we should develop.
Personally, concerning refactoring it, I'm doing a bit with several PRs but
we need to restructure InterpreterFactory. At first, list up all issues and
make some groups and handle it. How do you think?
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at
Here's some candidates for 0.8 IMO
- Restructing InterpreterFacotry
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2056Although it is
refactoring ticket, I feel it is pretty important thing to do. As I see
many bugs are due to interpreter factory component, and I do feel it needs
Hi dev & users,
Recently, community submits very new features for Apache Zeppelin. I think
it's very positive signals to improve Apache Zeppelin and its community.
But in another aspect, we should focus on what the next release includes. I
think we need to summarize and prioritize them. Here is
19 matches
Mail list logo