ibi <ralot...@eng.ucsd.edu>
*Date: *Monday, 29 January 2018 at 6:48 AM
*To: *<hubail...@gmail.com>
*Cc: *<users@asterixdb.apache.org>, <d...@asterixdb.apache.org>
*Subject: *Re: Hyracks Job Requirement Configuration
*- Do you see all cores being fully utilized during the query e
to select count(*) instead of subject_id.
Cheers,
Murtadha
From: Rana Alotaibi <ralot...@eng.ucsd.edu>
Date: Monday, 29 January 2018 at 6:48 AM
To: <hubail...@gmail.com>
Cc: <users@asterixdb.apache.org>, <d...@asterixdb.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Hyracks Job Requirement
necessarily lead to a better
> performance. Have you tried changing these values to something smaller and
> seeing the effects?
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Murtadha
>
>
>
> *From: *Rana Alotaibi <ralot...@eng.ucsd.edu>
> *Date: *Monday, 29 January 2018 at 5:21 AM
> *T
<ralot...@eng.ucsd.edu>
Date: Monday, 29 January 2018 at 5:21 AM
To: <hubail...@gmail.com>
Cc: <users@asterixdb.apache.org>, <d...@asterixdb.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Hyracks Job Requirement Configuration
Thanks Murtadha! The problem solved. However, increasing the numb
Thanks Murtadha! The problem solved. However, increasing the number of
cores didn't help to improve the performance of that query.
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 5:05 PM, Murtadha Hubail
wrote:
> Hi Rana,
>
> The memory used for query processing is automatically calculated as
>
Hi Rana,
The memory used for query processing is automatically calculated as follows:
JVM Max Memory - storage.buffercache.size - storage.memorycomponent.globalbudget
The documentation defaults for these parameters are outdated. The default value
for storage.buffercache.size is (JVM Max Memory
+ dev
On 1/28/18 3:37 PM, Rana Alotaibi wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to make AsterixDB utilizes all available CPU cores (39)
that I have for the following query:
USE mimiciii;
SET `compiler.parallelism` "39";
SET `compiler.sortmemory` "128MB";
SET `compiler.joinmemory` "265MB";
SELECT