the resource IDs would not necessarily be in the description of the event.
so can you select from event where type like 'VOLUME.*' and see if anything
is out there? "VOLUME.CREATE" is expected to be matched by "VOLUME.DELETE",
"VOLUME.ATTACH" by "VOLUME.DETACH", etc.
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 1:03 P
Hi Daan,
Am 18.05.2018 um 10:28 schrieb Daan Hoogland:
> It seems that only 5 of those volumes should have been
> reported between the 16th and the 16th, correct? Can you query for events
> for those volumes in the event table? By the order of events we might be
> able to draw some conclusions.
Melanie,
The usage server hasn't really changed for 4.11 but it has some old
behaviour that might be counter intuitive. The fact that an expunged volume
is shown doesn't seem strange to me though. Before it was expunged it has
existed. There has been usage for the volume so there should be a usage
Hi all,
I am just starting to have a first look on CloudStack Usage Service in 4.11.
Maybe I am getting something wrong, but to me it seems, that Usage
reports lists destroyed and expunged Volumes. Is that the intended
behaviour?
For an example project it lists the following records:
(rz-admin)
