Wido
>
> Regards.
>
>
> From: Rohit Yadav
> Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2017 12:08:59 PM
> To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to embedded Jetty and fatjar CloudStack
>
> All
@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to embedded Jetty and fatjar CloudStack
All,
The PR has received enough reviews and (regression) testings to consider it for
merging. I'll keep the PR open for few days to receive further reviews and
additional testing. Thanks.
Re
55 PM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to embedded Jetty and fatjar CloudStack
All,
The fatjar PR that aims at migrating to embedded Jetty is ready for review now:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2226
New configuration file up
`
- Remove unmaintained distro packagings and config files
Regards.
From: Rohit Yadav
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 1:24:06 AM
To: Syed Ahmed; d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Cloudstack Users List
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to embedded Jetty and fatjar CloudStack
rg
Cc: Rohit Yadav; Cloudstack Users List
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to embedded Jetty and fatjar CloudStack
I have always been a big fan of fat, dependency-free binaries. Good work guys!
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
> Op 10 augustus 2017 om 14:09 schreef Rohit Yadav :
>
>
> All,
>
>
> Distro provided tomcat6/7/* has caused production issues for few users in the
> past. Due to this, the ACS deployments are inconsistent with the version/jars
> of tomcat in use. By allowing exploded war to be shipped, can
