Hi,
i'm a big fan of simple solutions (KISS).
Currently i have DLM, cLVM, GFS2 and OCFS2 managed by pacemaker.
They all are fundamental prerequisites for my resources (Virtual Domains).
To configure them i used clones and groups.
Why not having them managed by systemd to make the cluster setup
On Tue, 2019-10-15 at 21:35 +0200, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i'm a big fan of simple solutions (KISS).
> Currently i have DLM, cLVM, GFS2 and OCFS2 managed by pacemaker.
> They all are fundamental prerequisites for my resources (Virtual
> Domains).
> To configure them i used clones and
I'm happy to announce that we have a date and location for the next
ClusterLabs Summit: Wednesday, Feb. 5, and Thursday, Feb. 6, 2020, in
Brno, Czechia. This year's host is Red Hat.
Details will be given on this wiki page as they become available:
On Tue, 2019-10-15 at 08:42 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> > > > Ken Gaillot schrieb am 15.10.2019 um
> > > > 00:47 in
>
> Nachricht
> :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > With Pacemaker 2.0.2, we introduced a new experimental option for
> > XML
> > output from stonith_admin. This was the test case for a new
On 2019-10-15 5:42 p.m., Ken Gaillot wrote:
> I'm happy to announce that we have a date and location for the next
> ClusterLabs Summit: Wednesday, Feb. 5, and Thursday, Feb. 6, 2020, in
> Brno, Czechia. This year's host is Red Hat.
>
> Details will be given on this wiki page as they become
Hello Lentes,o
In the cluster environment, usually we need to fence(or dynamically add/delete)
node,
the full stacks provided by packmaker/corosync can help to complete it
automatically/integrally.
Thanks
Gang
From: Users on behalf of Lentes, Bernd
Sent:
On 10/15/19 4:26 PM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I was trying to do a "crm resource migrate" the first time in SLES 12 (the
> way I did in SLES11), but I got this message:
> # crm resource migrate prm_isr_mail1 PT10M
> ERROR: resource.move: No target node: Move requires either a target
>>> Ken Gaillot schrieb am 15.10.2019 um 00:47 in
Nachricht
:
> Hi all,
>
> With Pacemaker 2.0.2, we introduced a new experimental option for XML
> output from stonith_admin. This was the test case for a new output
> model for Pacemaker tools. I'm happy to say this has been extended to
> crm_mon
It still works and I keep using it... Even in SLES 15.
I think that the warning is a nice addition as it puts a negative constraint
which can cause issue with you don't use lifetime option.
Best Regards,
Strahil NikolovOn Oct 15, 2019 11:26, Ulrich Windl
wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I was trying to do
Hi Ulrich,
On 10/15/19 10:26 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I was trying to do a "crm resource migrate" the first time in SLES 12 (the
> way I did in SLES11), but I got this message:
> # crm resource migrate prm_isr_mail1 PT10M
> ERROR: resource.move: No target node: Move requires either a
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 11:58 AM Yan Gao wrote:
> >
> > Help for "move" still says:
> > resource# help move
> > Move a resource to another node
> >
> > Move a resource away from its current location.
> Looks like an issue in the version of crmsh.
>
> Xin, could you please take a look?
>
>
Hi!
I was trying to do a "crm resource migrate" the first time in SLES 12 (the way
I did in SLES11), but I got this message:
# crm resource migrate prm_isr_mail1 PT10M
ERROR: resource.move: No target node: Move requires either a target node or
'force'
I'm surprised: In the past the mommand
What about the constraint.
I think there is no 'crm resource unmove' to remmove the constraint.
Best Regards,
Strahil NikolovOn Oct 15, 2019 11:52, Yan Gao wrote:
>
> Hi Ulrich,
>
> On 10/15/19 10:26 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I was trying to do a "crm resource migrate" the
DaShi,
typedef void (*cpg_totem_confchg_fn_t) (
cpg_handle_t handle,
struct cpg_ring_id ring_id,
uint32_t member_list_entries,
const uint32_t *member_list);
Should "struct cpg_ring_id ring_id" be "struct cpg_ring_id *ring_id"?
Nope, ringid is really passed
On 10/15/19 11:32 AM, Gao,Yan wrote:
> On 10/15/19 11:10 AM, Strahil wrote:
>> What about the constraint.
>> I think there is no 'crm resource unmove' to remmove the constraint.
> "crm resource clear" does that.
And "unmove" is deprecated/hidden, but should still work.
Regards,
Yan
>
>
15 matches
Mail list logo