Re: [ClusterLabs] crmsh 3.0 availability for RHEL 7..4?

https://software.opensuse.org/download.html?project=network%3Aha-clustering%3AStable=crmsh S pozdravem Kristián Feldsam Tel.: +420 773 303 353, +421 944 137 535 E-mail.: supp...@feldhost.cz www.feldhost.cz - FeldHost™ – Hostingové služby prispôsobíme vám. Máte špecifické požiadavky? Poradíme si

[ClusterLabs] Pacemaker confirm that node was fenced successfully

Hi all, I have question: We have Corosync/Pacemaker cluster running for KVM virtualisation. VM Instances are managed by external software (Opennebula). To achieve automatic migration of running VMs from failed node, external sw need fence node and confirm that was fenced successfully. When

Re: [ClusterLabs] Pacemaker confirm that node was fenced successfully

Ken Gaillot wrote: > > On Sat, 2018-08-11 at 17:38 +0200, FeldHost™ Admin wrote: >> Hi all, I have question: >> >> We have Corosync/Pacemaker cluster running for KVM virtualisation. VM >> Instances are managed by external software (Opennebula). To achieve >>

Re: [ClusterLabs] 2 Node Active-Passive DRBD , fallback fencing issues.

Would you share your corosync.conf and pacemaker config (pcs cluster cib)? S pozdravem Kristián Feldsam Tel.: +420 773 303 353, +421 944 137 535 E-mail.: supp...@feldhost.cz www.feldhost.cz - FeldHost™ – Hostingové služby prispôsobíme vám. Máte špecifické požiadavky? Poradíme si s nimi.

Re: [ClusterLabs] SAN, pacemaker, KVM: live-migration with ext3 ?

hello, yes, you need ocfs2 or gfs2, but in your case (raw image) probably better to use lvm > On 5 Sep 2018, at 18:13, Lentes, Bernd > wrote: > > Hi guys, > > just to be sure. I thought (maybe i'm wrong) that having a VM on a shared > storage (FC SAN), e.g. in a raw file on an ext3 fs on

Re: [ClusterLabs] SAN, pacemaker, KVM: live-migration with ext3 ?

Why you use FS for raw image, when you can use directly LV as block device for your VM > On 5 Sep 2018, at 18:34, Lentes, Bernd > wrote: > > > > - On Sep 5, 2018, at 6:28 PM, FeldHost™ Admin ad...@feldhost.cz wrote: > >> hello, yes, you need ocfs2 or gfs2,

Re: [ClusterLabs] DLM connection channel switch take too long time (> 5mins)

Hello Gang He, which type of corosync rrp_mode you use? Passive or Active? Did you try test both? Also, what kernel version you use? I see some SCTP fixes in latest kernels. > On 8 Mar 2018, at 08:52, Gang He wrote: > > Hello list and David Teigland, > > I got a problem under

Re: [ClusterLabs] [Cluster-devel] DLM connection channel switch take too long time (> 5mins)

Hi, so try to use active mode. https://www.suse.com/documentation/sle_ha/book_sleha/data/sec_ha_installation_terms.html That fixes I saw in 4.14.* > On 8 Mar 2018, at 09:12, Gang He wrote: > > Hi Feldhost, > > >> Hello Gang He, >> >> which type of corosync rrp_mode you

Re: [ClusterLabs] GFS2 + KVM with qcow2 recommended IO mode

ice <anpr...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 28/02/18 14:03, FeldHost™ Admin wrote: >> Hello all, >> I have GFS2 cluster with KVM using qcow2 images. What is recommended IO >> mode? threads or native? I will be happy for recommendation and explanation. > > You'd l

Re: [ClusterLabs] Any CLVM/DLM users around?

Probably you need to enable_startup_fencing = 0 instead of enable_fencing = 0. S pozdravem Kristián Feldsam Tel.: +420 773 303 353, +421 944 137 535 E-mail.: supp...@feldhost.cz www.feldhost.cz - FeldHost™ – Hostingové služby přizpůsobíme Vám Máte specifické požadavky? Poradíme si s nimi.