18 10:45 AM
To: users@daffodil.apache.org
Subject: Re: Why is there an arbitrary limit that Daffodil imposes so that
arrays can't be bigger than 1024 elements?
So, a shape file that big may not be possible to parse right now.
If you just think about the enlargement due to expanding the
le
Tresys
From: Costello, Roger L.
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 10:18:07 AM
To: users@daffodil.apache.org
Subject: RE: Why is there an arbitrary limit that Daffodil imposes so that
arrays can't be bigger than 1024 elements?
Thanks for the explanation Mike!
*
e.org
Subject: Re: Why is there an arbitrary limit that Daffodil imposes so that
arrays can't be bigger than 1024 elements?
We certainly can enlarge these initial settings, as they do seem awfully small.
And we can probably have a "unlimited" setting, but the point of this &qu
We certainly can enlarge these initial settings, as they do seem awfully small.
And we can probably have a "unlimited" setting, but the point of this "limited"
behavior was in general to avoid the kinds of problems that come up with
unlimited - as in "did you really mean 8 trillion is ok?"
E.
