I am in the midst of a debug of DPDK for a different card type so I can't
say for sure and I am not expert but, the testpmd looks fine. And the
disappearing ports is to be expected and would be replaced during use
(testpmd is a driver test only). You need something riding on top of it
like in our c
Hi Darrell,
For ETH_RSS_IP | ETH_RSS_UDP | ETH_RSS_TCP
each expand out to a set of packet type bitmasks in dpdk
./lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h.
ETH_RSS_IP expands to:
ETH_RSS_IPV4 | \
ETH_RSS_FRAG_IPV4 | \
...
ETH_RSS_NONFRAG_IPV6_OTHER | \
ETH_RSS_IPV6_EX)
At least
We are working with 2 vendors (OS and hardware) and are stumped on an
issue. We have a server with 4 X710 cards installed. We have perhaps 500+
servers configured this way. Now, in installing Openstack with DPDK. we are
seeing a number of systems fail with cards in random slots failing
initializati
On 12/07/2017 17:07, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 15:50:58 +0200
"jonathan.ri...@fraudbuster.mobi" wrote:
Hi all,
We got a bunch of X710 NIC and cant use them with our custom app.
As the topic says, rte_eth_dev_count returns 0. And after a quick
investigation with testpmd, we
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of
> vuon...@viettel.com.vn
> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 3:04 AM
> Cc: users@dpdk.org; d...@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] Rx Can't receive anymore packet after received 1.5
> billion packet.
>
> Hi DPDK team,
> So
We're using receive side scaling with Intel NICs that use the net_ixgbe PMD.
Our application needs to be able to follow entire conversations in a
higher-level protocol, such as HTTP or SMTP, which requires us to set a hashing
key such that (a, b) hashes to the same value as (b, a) (i.e. client->
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Nidhia Varghese
> Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 10:44 AM
> To: d...@dpdk.org; users@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] Sharing of pipelines in IP_PIPELINE application
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to create a Mac-Learning pipe
Hello,
I am having a problem with packets loss and I hope you can help me out.
Below you find a description of the application and of the problem.
It is a little long, but I really hope somebody out there can help me,
because this is driving me crazy.
*Application*
I have a client-server applic
Hi Harold,
Sorry I don't have a direct answer on your request, but I have a bunch
of questions.
1. What is "packet_id" here? It's something inside of your udp payload?
2. How do you know you have the packet loss? How can you be sure it's
packet loss if you don't see it on your counters? How can y
Dear Pavel,
Thank you for your feedback; I really appreciate it. I reply to your
questions inline.
Regards,
Harold
2017-07-17 22:38 GMT+02:00 Pavel Shirshov :
> Hi Harold,
>
> Sorry I don't have a direct answer on your request, but I have a bunch
> of questions.
>
> 1. What is "packet_id" he
Hello again,
I tried to convert my statically defined buffers into buffers allocated
through rte_malloc (as discussed in the previous email, see quoted text).
Unfortunately, the problem is still there :(
Regards,
Harold
>
> 2. How do you know you have the packet loss?
>
>
> *I know it becaus
On 07/17/2017 05:31 PM, cristian.dumitre...@intel.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of
vuon...@viettel.com.vn
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 3:04 AM
Cc: users@dpdk.org; d...@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] Rx Can't receive anymore packet after r
As I understand the problem disappears with 1 RX queue on server. You can
reduce number of queues on server from 8 and arrive at an optimal value
without packet loss.
For intel 82599 NIC packet loss is experienced with more than 4 RX queues,
this was reported in dpdk dev or user mailing list, read
13 matches
Mail list logo
