Re: [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] Suggestions on how to customize the metadata fields of each packet

2018-02-23 Thread Ananyev, Konstantin
Hi Victor, > > Thanks for your quick answer, > > I have read so many documents and web pages on this issue that probably I > confounded the utility of the headroom. It is good to know that this 128 > bytes space is available to my disposal. The fact of being lost once the > NIC transmits the

Re: [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] IPSEC: No IPv6 SP Inbound rule specified

2020-09-22 Thread Ananyev, Konstantin
> Hi Anoob and DPDK Dev Team, > > -->While we are running the ipsec-secgw application. We are getting > > following error: > > > > IPSEC: No IPv6 SP Inbound rule specified > > IPSEC: No IPv6 SP Outbound rule specified Wonder what makes you think it is an error? It is just a message saying

RE: Does ACL support field size of 8 bytes?

2022-04-28 Thread Ananyev, Konstantin
Hi Ido, > I've lots of good experience with ACL but can't make it work with u64 values > I know it can be split to 2xu32 fields, but it makes it more complex to use > and a wastes double number of fields (we hit the > RTE_ACL_MAX_FIELDS 64 limit) Wow, that's a lot of fields... > According to